Reduced heart rate variability (HRV) is known to be a predictor of mortality after a heart attack. One measure of HRV is the average normal-to-normal beat interval (in milliseconds) for a 24-hr time period. Twenty-two heart attack patients who were dog owners and 80 heart attack patients who did not own a dog participated in a study of the effect of pet ownership on HRV, resulting in the summary statistics shown in the accompanying table.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question

Reduced heart rate variability (HRV) is known to be a predictor of mortality after a heart attack. One measure of HRV is the average normal-to-normal beat interval (in milliseconds) for a 24-hr time period. Twenty-two heart attack patients who were dog owners and 80 heart attack patients who did not own a dog participated in a study of the effect of pet ownership on HRV, resulting in the summary statistics shown in the accompanying table.

The authors of this paper used a two-sample t test to test H0: ?1 − ?2 = 0 versus Ha: ?1 − ?2 ≠ 0.

What conditions must be met in order for this to be an appropriate method of analysis? (Select all that apply.)

Find the test statistic and P-value. 

Reduced heart rate variability (HRV) is known to be a predictor of mortality after a heart attack. One measure of HRV is the average normal-to-normal beat interval (in milliseconds) for a 24-hr time
period. Twenty-two heart attack patients who were dog owners and 80 heart attack patients who did not own a dog participated in a study of the effect of pet ownership on HRV, resulting in the
summary statistics shown in the accompanying table.
Measure of HRV
(Average Normal-to-Normal Beat Interval)
Standard
Mean
Deviation
Owns Dog
875
134
Does Not Own Dog
800
133
In USE SALT
(a) The authors of this paper used a two-sample t test to test Ho: µ, - H2
= 0 versus H,: H, - H, + 0. What conditions must be met in order for this to be an appropriate method of analysis?
(Select all that apply.)
The samples must be randomly selected from or representative of their populations of interest.
The samples must be paired.
The population distributions must be approximately normal.
The samples must be independently selected.
Both sample sizes must be at least 30.
Both sample sizes must be at least 30 or the population distributions must be approximately normal.
None of the above
Transcribed Image Text:Reduced heart rate variability (HRV) is known to be a predictor of mortality after a heart attack. One measure of HRV is the average normal-to-normal beat interval (in milliseconds) for a 24-hr time period. Twenty-two heart attack patients who were dog owners and 80 heart attack patients who did not own a dog participated in a study of the effect of pet ownership on HRV, resulting in the summary statistics shown in the accompanying table. Measure of HRV (Average Normal-to-Normal Beat Interval) Standard Mean Deviation Owns Dog 875 134 Does Not Own Dog 800 133 In USE SALT (a) The authors of this paper used a two-sample t test to test Ho: µ, - H2 = 0 versus H,: H, - H, + 0. What conditions must be met in order for this to be an appropriate method of analysis? (Select all that apply.) The samples must be randomly selected from or representative of their populations of interest. The samples must be paired. The population distributions must be approximately normal. The samples must be independently selected. Both sample sizes must be at least 30. Both sample sizes must be at least 30 or the population distributions must be approximately normal. None of the above
(b) The paper indicates that the null hypothesis in part (a) was rejected and reported that the P-value was less than 0.05. Carry out a two-sample t test. (Use a = 0.05. Use
for heart attack
patients who are dog owners and u, for heart attack patients who do not own a dog.)
Find the test statistic and P-value. (Use SALT. Round your test statistic to one decimal place and your P-value to three decimal places.)
t =
2.417
P-value =
0.000
State the conclusion in the problem context. Is your conclusion consistent with the one given in the paper?
We reject Ho: We do not have convincing evidence that heart attack patients who are dog owners have a different average measure of HRV than heart attack patients who do not own a
dog. The conclusion is consistent with the one given in the paper.
We reject Ho. We have convincing evidence that heart attack patients who are dog owners have a different average measure of HRV than heart attack patients who do not own a dog. The
conclusion is consistent with the one given in the paper.
We fail to reject Ho. We do not have convincing evidence that heart attack patients who are dog owners have a different average measure of HRV than heart attack patients who do not own
a dog. The conclusion is not consistent with the one given in the paper.
We fail to reject Ho. We have convincing evidence that heart attack patients who are dog owners have a different average measure of HRV than heart attack patients who do not own a dog.
The conclusion is not consistent with the one given in the paper.
Transcribed Image Text:(b) The paper indicates that the null hypothesis in part (a) was rejected and reported that the P-value was less than 0.05. Carry out a two-sample t test. (Use a = 0.05. Use for heart attack patients who are dog owners and u, for heart attack patients who do not own a dog.) Find the test statistic and P-value. (Use SALT. Round your test statistic to one decimal place and your P-value to three decimal places.) t = 2.417 P-value = 0.000 State the conclusion in the problem context. Is your conclusion consistent with the one given in the paper? We reject Ho: We do not have convincing evidence that heart attack patients who are dog owners have a different average measure of HRV than heart attack patients who do not own a dog. The conclusion is consistent with the one given in the paper. We reject Ho. We have convincing evidence that heart attack patients who are dog owners have a different average measure of HRV than heart attack patients who do not own a dog. The conclusion is consistent with the one given in the paper. We fail to reject Ho. We do not have convincing evidence that heart attack patients who are dog owners have a different average measure of HRV than heart attack patients who do not own a dog. The conclusion is not consistent with the one given in the paper. We fail to reject Ho. We have convincing evidence that heart attack patients who are dog owners have a different average measure of HRV than heart attack patients who do not own a dog. The conclusion is not consistent with the one given in the paper.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman