Questions: 2-9. As a compensation professional, what would you do? 2-10. What factor(s) in this ethical dilemma might influence a person to make a less-than-ethical decision?

Management, Loose-Leaf Version
13th Edition
ISBN:9781305969308
Author:Richard L. Daft
Publisher:Richard L. Daft
Chapter12: Managing Human Talent
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1ED
icon
Related questions
Question
Case 2: Ethics Dilemma: Perpetuating the Gender Pay Gap
at Safe Security Alarm Systems
Roberto Jiminez, compensation manager for Safe-Security Systems, is scheduled to meet Sally Brown,
director of customer satisfaction, at 3 pm today. The purpose for meeting is to discuss the terms of job
offers for two candidates who they hope will fill vacancies in the customer service department. One will
oversee customer service based on purchasing experience, and the other will oversee post-service (for
example, after a routine service check or repair) customer satisfaction. Other than these differences, the
required skills, knowledge, abilities, education, and relevant work experience are the same. Roberto and
Sally hope that candidate Jill Johnson will oversee post-sales activities and Sean Miller will oversee
post-service activities.
In preparation for the meeting, Roberto reviewed annual salary survey information for customer
service manager jobs in the local area, revealing a range of $50,000 to $75,000. He also compared Safe-
Security's job descriptions and the competitors' job descriptions. Roberto concluded that the job descrip-
tions are comparable and that salary offers of $60,000 were competitive.
Roberto explained his findings and recommendations to Sally who expressed that the market salary
information was no longer useful. She already told each candidate that they would receive a salary offer
that is 10 percent higher than their current pay. Jill earned $45,000, resulting in a salary offer equaling
$49,500 and Sean earned $60,000, resulting in a salary offer of $66,000. Neither Jill nor Sean knew the
other's starting pay rate, and both were satisfied with the 10 percent increase.
In an angry tone, Roberto asked Sally whether she considered the fact that both candidates pos-
sessed equally impressive credentials or the fact that both would be performing the same job. Sally
acknowledged their equal credentials and agreed that the jobs were equal, save for difference in cus-
tomer satisfaction focus. She added that she had asked Sean and Jill their previous salaries, which led to
her decision to offer each a 10 percent higher starting salary. Sally ignored Roberto's anger and stated
that the salary offers fit well within the departmental budget and she could not afford to pay anything
more. She also went on to say that Jill expressed joy about her offer because she is desperate to leave her
current position.
Questions:
2-9. As a compensation professional, what would you do?
2-10. What factor(s) in this ethical dilemma might influence a person to make a less-than-ethical
decision?
Transcribed Image Text:Case 2: Ethics Dilemma: Perpetuating the Gender Pay Gap at Safe Security Alarm Systems Roberto Jiminez, compensation manager for Safe-Security Systems, is scheduled to meet Sally Brown, director of customer satisfaction, at 3 pm today. The purpose for meeting is to discuss the terms of job offers for two candidates who they hope will fill vacancies in the customer service department. One will oversee customer service based on purchasing experience, and the other will oversee post-service (for example, after a routine service check or repair) customer satisfaction. Other than these differences, the required skills, knowledge, abilities, education, and relevant work experience are the same. Roberto and Sally hope that candidate Jill Johnson will oversee post-sales activities and Sean Miller will oversee post-service activities. In preparation for the meeting, Roberto reviewed annual salary survey information for customer service manager jobs in the local area, revealing a range of $50,000 to $75,000. He also compared Safe- Security's job descriptions and the competitors' job descriptions. Roberto concluded that the job descrip- tions are comparable and that salary offers of $60,000 were competitive. Roberto explained his findings and recommendations to Sally who expressed that the market salary information was no longer useful. She already told each candidate that they would receive a salary offer that is 10 percent higher than their current pay. Jill earned $45,000, resulting in a salary offer equaling $49,500 and Sean earned $60,000, resulting in a salary offer of $66,000. Neither Jill nor Sean knew the other's starting pay rate, and both were satisfied with the 10 percent increase. In an angry tone, Roberto asked Sally whether she considered the fact that both candidates pos- sessed equally impressive credentials or the fact that both would be performing the same job. Sally acknowledged their equal credentials and agreed that the jobs were equal, save for difference in cus- tomer satisfaction focus. She added that she had asked Sean and Jill their previous salaries, which led to her decision to offer each a 10 percent higher starting salary. Sally ignored Roberto's anger and stated that the salary offers fit well within the departmental budget and she could not afford to pay anything more. She also went on to say that Jill expressed joy about her offer because she is desperate to leave her current position. Questions: 2-9. As a compensation professional, what would you do? 2-10. What factor(s) in this ethical dilemma might influence a person to make a less-than-ethical decision?
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Management, Loose-Leaf Version
Management, Loose-Leaf Version
Management
ISBN:
9781305969308
Author:
Richard L. Daft
Publisher:
South-Western College Pub