QUESTION 4. Consider the following game. Player 1's payoffs are listed first, in bold: P2 W X Y A 200, 300 100, 500 300 3 1 " " B P1 0, 300 0 400 0 500 0, 3 C 20, 300 10, 300 310, 400 50 2 I a. Does either player have any weakly dominant strategies? List it/them or explain why not. b. Does either player have any strictly dominated strategies? If yes, list it/them. C. If the game were played sequentially with Player 1 going first, what is the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium? Z 500

QUESTION 4. Consider the following game. Player 1's payoffs are listed first, in bold: P2 W X Y A 200, 300 100, 500 300 3 1 " " B P1 0, 300 0 400 0 500 0, 3 C 20, 300 10, 300 310, 400 50 2 I a. Does either player have any weakly dominant strategies? List it/them or explain why not. b. Does either player have any strictly dominated strategies? If yes, list it/them. C. If the game were played sequentially with Player 1 going first, what is the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium? Z 500

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Refer to the following payoff table: Firm A's Advertising Budget Multiple Choice Low O Medium High Firm A High Firm A High A Firm B Medium D G Low $900, $900 $1,000 $800 Firm B's Advertising Budget Medium B E H $820, $1,220 $950, $1,025 $875, $920 $800, $875 After the first round of elimination, are there any dominant strategies? If so, which one(s)? C Neither firm has a dominant strategy after the first round. F High $1,060, $1,100 $1,040, $1,000 $1,025, $1,175
12. An important characteristic of a dominant strategy is that: Select one: a. it is the best strategy to dominate your opponents b. it always leads to a Nash equilibrium where all players equally well off c. it can prevent the game reaching a Nash equilibrium d. it is the best strategy for a player, regardless of whatever strategy the opponent chooses
3. Consider the following payoff matrix for a complementary investment game: WCG a. Do Not Invest C. Invest b. What is the Nash equilibrium? Do Not Invest What is the maximin solution? 0 Does either firm have a dominant strategy? -100 BB 0 0 Invest 0 20 d. How do your answers change if BB loses 5 if it invests and WCG doesn't invest? 110 10
1. Consider the following game matrix. Player A Answer: Top Bottom Left a, b e, f Player B Right c, d g, h (a) If top and left are strictly dominant strategies, then what do we know the relationship of the parameters? (b) If (top, left) is a Nash equilibrium, then what do we know the relationship of the parameters? Answer: (c) If top and left are strictly dominant strategies, will (top, left) be a Nash equilibrium? Why? Answer: (d) If (top, left) is a Nash equilibrium, must the strategies be strictly dominant strategies? Why? Answer:
1. The table below shows a prisoner's dilemma in normal form. Players 1 and 2 each choose between D and C. D C D 2,2 1,10 10, 1 5,5 Answer the following questions. Remember to explain your reasoning. (a) If the game is played only once, what is the equilibrium in dominant strategies? (b) If the game is played three times in a row, what action does each player choose in every round? Suppose that the game is repeated indefinitely. The players do not discount the future. How- ever, the game ends with probability p € (0, 1) after each round. Assume that each player uses the following grim-trigger strategy. Each player chooses C in the first round. Each player chooses C in the current round if both players chose C in every previous round. Each player chooses D in the current round if either player chose D in some previous round. (c) If p = 1, is it optimal for each player to use the grim-trigger strategy above given that the other player uses the grim-trigger strategy above? [Hint: compare…
2
A 201.
The hand written is not allowed.
No written by hand solution
12. What is the subgame-perfect outcome from a finitely repeated game? a. Iterated Elimination Outcome played in each stage b. Backwards Induction Outcome played in each stage Nash Equilibrium played in each stage d. Nash Equilibrium in stage 1 only