1. Consider the following game matrix.Player AAnswer:TopBottomLefta, be, fPlayer BRightc, dg, h(a) If top and left are strictly dominant strategies, then what do we know the relationship of theparameters?(b) If (top, left) is a Nash equilibrium, then what do we know the relationship of the parameters?Answer:(c) If top and left are strictly dominant strategies, will (top, left) be a Nash equilibrium? Why?Answer:(d) If (top, left) is a Nash equilibrium, must the strategies be strictly dominant strategies? Why?Answer:

Dominant strategy: In game theory, a dominant strategy is a strategy that provides a player with…

1. Consider the following game matrix. Player A Top Bottom Left a, b e, f Player B Right c, d g, h (a) If top and left are strictly dominant strategies, then what do we know the relationship of the parameters?

1. Consider the following game matrix. Player A Top Bottom Left a, b e, f Player B Right c, d g, h (a) If top and left are strictly dominant strategies, then what do we know the relationship of the parameters?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In the game theory diagram. Is it firstly okay that I use decimals? And what is the Nash equilibrium and dominant strategies of each player. Where high = high price and low = low price. For the two companies
12) What is a Nash equilibrium? Why do we generally think that Nash equilibria will be likely outcomes of games?
Problem 1 Consider the following two-person game: 1 2 C ea Prsover's D U 4, 7 6,0 10, 4 11, 5 M 5, 4 7,5 0, 3 6, 3 D 3, 12 5, 10 12, 5 8, 16 Use successive elimination of dominated strategies to find the optimal strategies.
3. The following is an interpretation of the rivalry between the United States (USA) and the Soviet Ünion (USSR) during the cold war. Each side has the choice of two strategies: Aggressive and Restrained. The payoff table is given as follows: USSR Restrained Aggressiveness Restrained 4,3 1,4 USA Aggressiveness 3,1 2,2 a) Consider this game when the two countries move simultaneously. Find all pure strategy Nash equilibria. b) Next consider three alternative ways in which the game could be played with sequential moves: (i) The USA moves first and the USSR moves second. (i) the USSR moves first and the USA moves second. (i) The USSR moves first, and the USA moves second, but the USSR has a further move after the USA moves. For each case, draw the game tree and find the subgame-perfect Nash equilibrium. c) What are the key strategic issues (commitment, credibility and so on) for the two countries. (Note: Be concise. Your answer should not exceed 300 words].
7) What is a repeated game? Why are repeated games useful to consider? What is the difference between finitely repeated games and infinitely repeated games? Provide an example of a political situation that would be usefully modeled with a repeated game.
2. Consider the game matrix given here: a. If (T, L) is a dominant strategy equilibrium, then what inequalities must hold among a,…,h? b. If (T, L) is a Nash equilibrium, then which of the above inequalities must be satisfied?
one two X, 14 three four Firm B Low Firm A Sell High 6, Y Buy Low Let X = 9, Y = 15 and Z=10. This game has 10, Z Firm B High 8,8 Nash equilibrium.
1. Consider the zero-sum game given by 3 1 2 A = 4 0 2 1 2 -2 3 1 (a) Calculate the gain floor and loss ceiling for A. (b) Without using dominance, use the Equilibrium Theorem to determine whether it is possible for A to have a mixed Nash Equilibrium where player two's strategy is of the form (a, b, c, 0) with a, b, c > 0.
Refer to the following payoff table: Firm A's Advertising Budget Multiple Choice Low O Medium High Firm A High Firm A High A Firm B Medium D G Low $900, $900 $1,000 $800 Firm B's Advertising Budget Medium B E H $820, $1,220 $950, $1,025 $875, $920 $800, $875 After the first round of elimination, are there any dominant strategies? If so, which one(s)? C Neither firm has a dominant strategy after the first round. F High $1,060, $1,100 $1,040, $1,000 $1,025, $1,175
Please solve all
Use the following game table to answer the question: Player 2 Y A 10, 5 6, 3 0,0 Player 1 B 2,6 1, 3 0,0 3,5 3, 4 3, 3 One of these players has a strictly dominant strategy. Which player, and what strategy is it? Player 2; Y Player 1; A Player 2; X O Player 1; B O Player 1; X
4) Consider the following payoff matrix: Player 1 Strategy A Strategy B c) Is the payoff matrix symmetric? Player 2 Strategy A Strategy B (0,0) (7,4) (2,2) (3,3) a) Does either player have a dominant strategy? b) Is there one or more Nash Equilibrium? 1