Answered: Question 16. In A Strict Liability… | bartleby

Related questions

Question

Corporate Law Interview Questions
Question 16. In A Strict Liability Tort, It Is
Necessary To Prove That:

Expert Solution

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Blurred answer

Similar questions

Question 5 With reference to the English Legal System: a) Explain, identify and illustrate three rules of statutory interpretation. b) Explain mediation and arbitration as alternative methods of resolving civil disputes and the advantages of these alternatives compared to taking action through the civil courts. c) Identify and explain the key differences between Civil & Criminal Law.
Facts: Mr. Johnson owns a 600-acre woodlot in Ohio. The trees in his woodlot are old-growth hardwood and much in demand by woodcarvers. When he gets an order for wood, he cuts down the appropriate trees and trims them to the woodcarver's specifications. The woodcarver requesting the wood will make the arrangements for picking up the wood. Recently Mr. Johnson took on an apprentice, who after a year of learning the craft will leave and may or may not go into the same business. The apprentice is a computer geek desirous of a change of pace and lifestyle and works for free since he had made a substantial amount in the stock market. Recently Mr. Johnson's friend came to visit and suggested that he is subject to OSHA. Question to be Answered: Is Mr. Johnson's business subject to OSHA law and regulations concerning the apprentice?
There does not need to be any exchange of words for there to be an implied contract. Question 24 options: True False When an illegal contract is executed upon, the court normally will leave the parties where it finds them even if partial performance has occurred. Question 25 options: True False A person who has injested drugs or alcohol will automatically have the choice to make void any contract entered into while under the influence. Question 6 options: True False
QUESTION 3: INTERPRETING STATUTES (1,200 WORDS)(a) Section 5 of the (hypothetical) Civic Spaces Act 2009 (WA) provides, â€œIt is an offence to deface any public space in Western Australiaâ€. The maximum penalty is $500.In the course of his second reading speech the responsible Minister told Parliament that: â€œThe reason why we need this legislation is because we are sick of idiots defacing our public places, especially our trains and buildings, with their foul pictures and meaningless graffiti. We want families to be able to come to the city and not be confronted by this rubbishâ€.The Long Title of the Act is: â€œAn Act to Promote Clean Public Placesâ€.On 20 July 2010, Rosie, an artist with a social conscience, draws a large picture, using chalk, on the pavement outside Parliament depicting a homeless person under a bridge. She does the same drawing, using paint, on the toilet door of a public…
Which of the following remedies may be provided for in a contract? Question 6Answer a. liquidated damages, deposits, down payments b. rescission, specific performance, injunction c. all of the above d. none of the above
QUESTION 1 Which of the following is a FALSE statement? A. The E-Sign Act completely prevents the use of electronic signatures for contracting on the Internet. B. If an employer wants to preserve the at-will employment status of his or her employees, the employer should insert disclaimers in its codes and handbooks that nothing therein can be construed to create an express or implied employment contract. C. A basic principle of the National Labor Relations Act is that employers cannot terminate employees in order to discourage or encourage union membership. D. “Going public” by a company offering to sell shares of stock to the public typically results in access to broader financial markets from which to obtain capital. QUESTION 2 1. The tort of assault and the tort of battery are: A. Two names for the exact same tort. B. Strict liability torts. C. Independent torts which can occur separately from one another. D. Require proof of each of the separate elements of negligence.…
Pls help ASAP
Sara has a cute cuddly black bear cub. While letting the cub sit in the neighbor kid's lap, the playful cub accidentally scratches the kid's face requiring stitches. Sara is probably: Question 10 options: A) not liable, assumption of the risk. B) liable, strict liability. C) liable, she was clearly negligent. D) not liable, the kid consented to hold the cub.
Business Scenarios and Case Problems 18-1. Conditions of Performance. The Caplans contract with Faithful Construction, Inc., to build a house for them for $360,000. The specifications state "all plumbing bowls and fixtures... to be Crane brand." The Caplans leave on vacation, and during their absence, Faithful is unable to buy and install Crane plumbing fixtures. Instead, Faithful installs Kohler brand fixtures, an equivalent in the industry. On completion of the building contract, the Caplans inspect the work, discover the substitution, and refuse to accept the house, claiming Faithful has breached the conditions set forth in the specifications. Discuss fully the Caplans' claim. (See Conditions.)
Question 2 a) Identify and explain the common law factors that help distinguish employees and contractors. b) Discuss the differences between wrongful and unfair dismissal and the remedies that are available.