Pulmonary Disease. Suppose a 1980 study was conducted whose purpose was to compare the indoor air quality in offices where smoking was permitted with that in offices where smoking was not permitted. Measurements were made of carbon monoxide (CO) at 1:20 p.m. in 40 work areas where smoking was permitted and in 40 work areas where smoking was not permitted. Where smoking was permitted, the mean CO level was 11,7 parts per million (ppm) and the standard deviation CO was 7.4 ppm. Where smoking was not permitted, the mean CO was 6.6 ppm and the standard deviation CO was 2.8 ppm. (Let population 1 be smoking was permitted and population 2 be smoking was not permitted.) (a) Test for whether the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments. (Use a 0.05.) State the null and alternative hypotheses (in ppm). (Enter 1- for as needed.) Ho Find the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) Find the p-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) p-value= State your conclusion. Fail to reject Ho There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments, O Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments. Fail to reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments. Reject He. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments.
Pulmonary Disease. Suppose a 1980 study was conducted whose purpose was to compare the indoor air quality in offices where smoking was permitted with that in offices where smoking was not permitted. Measurements were made of carbon monoxide (CO) at 1:20 p.m. in 40 work areas where smoking was permitted and in 40 work areas where smoking was not permitted. Where smoking was permitted, the mean CO level was 11,7 parts per million (ppm) and the standard deviation CO was 7.4 ppm. Where smoking was not permitted, the mean CO was 6.6 ppm and the standard deviation CO was 2.8 ppm. (Let population 1 be smoking was permitted and population 2 be smoking was not permitted.) (a) Test for whether the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments. (Use a 0.05.) State the null and alternative hypotheses (in ppm). (Enter 1- for as needed.) Ho Find the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) Find the p-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) p-value= State your conclusion. Fail to reject Ho There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments, O Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments. Fail to reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments. Reject He. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments.
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter4: Equations Of Linear Functions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 8SGR
Related questions
Question
![Pulmonary Disease.
Suppose a 1980 study was conducted whose purpose was to compare the indoor air quality in offices where smoking was permitted with that in offices where
smoking was not permitted. Measurements were made of carbon monoxide (CO) at 1:20 p.m. in 40 work areas where smoking was permitted and in 40 work
areas where smoking was not permitted. Where smoking was permitted, the mean CO level was 11.7 parts per million (ppm) and the standard deviation CO was
7.4 ppm. Where smoking was not permitted, the mean CO was 6.6 ppm and the standard deviation CO was 2.8 ppm. (Let population 1 be smoking was permitted
and population 2 be smoking was not permitted.).
(a) Test for whether the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments. (Use a 0.05.)
State the null and alternative hypotheses (in ppm). (Enter 1- for as needed.)
Find the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)
Find the p-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
p-value=
State your conclusion.
O Fail to reject H. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments.
O Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments.
O Fail to reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments.
Reject Ho. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments.](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2Fa958086a-512a-4f04-bd60-3025fca1576f%2F2e75faa5-fff6-450f-baf3-05f72b297fdf%2Ffp9cixf_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:Pulmonary Disease.
Suppose a 1980 study was conducted whose purpose was to compare the indoor air quality in offices where smoking was permitted with that in offices where
smoking was not permitted. Measurements were made of carbon monoxide (CO) at 1:20 p.m. in 40 work areas where smoking was permitted and in 40 work
areas where smoking was not permitted. Where smoking was permitted, the mean CO level was 11.7 parts per million (ppm) and the standard deviation CO was
7.4 ppm. Where smoking was not permitted, the mean CO was 6.6 ppm and the standard deviation CO was 2.8 ppm. (Let population 1 be smoking was permitted
and population 2 be smoking was not permitted.).
(a) Test for whether the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments. (Use a 0.05.)
State the null and alternative hypotheses (in ppm). (Enter 1- for as needed.)
Find the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)
Find the p-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
p-value=
State your conclusion.
O Fail to reject H. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments.
O Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments.
O Fail to reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments.
Reject Ho. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments.
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 6 steps with 12 images
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
Recommended textbooks for you
![Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780079039897/9780079039897_smallCoverImage.jpg)
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
![Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780079039897/9780079039897_smallCoverImage.jpg)
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill