Problem 3: Labor Contracts. Suppose that Lionel Messi is negotiating a contract with FC Barcelona. Messi has an offer from Real Madrid for $20 million a year. If he signs with FC Barcelona, they will earn $90 million in revenue from the signing. FC Barcelona's next best option is to sign Cristiano Ronaldo. They would earn $70 million from signing Ronaldo and would pay him a contract of $10 million. Messi's bargaining power is w= a) What is the negotiated salary between Messi and FC Barcelona under Nash Bargain- ing? What is Messi's surplus and what is FC Barcelona's surplus? b) Due to an injury, FC Barcelona would only earn $50 million from signing Ronaldo but everything else remains the same. What is the negotiated salary between Messi and FC Barcelona under Nash Bargaining? What is Messi's surplus and what is FC Barcelona's surplus?

Problem 3: Labor Contracts. Suppose that Lionel Messi is negotiating a contract with FC Barcelona. Messi has an offer from Real Madrid for $20 million a year. If he signs with FC Barcelona, they will earn $90 million in revenue from the signing. FC Barcelona's next best option is to sign Cristiano Ronaldo. They would earn $70 million from signing Ronaldo and would pay him a contract of $10 million. Messi's bargaining power is w= a) What is the negotiated salary between Messi and FC Barcelona under Nash Bargain- ing? What is Messi's surplus and what is FC Barcelona's surplus? b) Due to an injury, FC Barcelona would only earn $50 million from signing Ronaldo but everything else remains the same. What is the negotiated salary between Messi and FC Barcelona under Nash Bargaining? What is Messi's surplus and what is FC Barcelona's surplus?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

9. In an infinitely repeated Prisoner's Dilemma, a version of what is known as a "tit for tat" strategy of a player 2 is described as follows: ⚫ There are two "statuses" that player i might be in during any period: "normal" and "revenge"; • In a normal status player i cooperates; ⚫ In a revenge status player i defects; • From a normal status, player i switches to the revenge status in the next period only if the other player defects in this period; • From a revenge status player i automatically switches back to the normal status in the next period regardless of the other player's action in this period. Consider an infinitely repeated game so that with probability p that the game continues to the next period and with probability (1-p) it ends. Cooperate (C) Defect (D) Cooperate (C) 4,4 5,0 Defect (D) 0,5 1,1 What is the threshold p* such that when p≥ p* always cooperating by player 2 is a best response to player 1 playing tit for tat and starting in a normal status, but when p < p*…
Consider the following story: Charlie finds two fifty-pence pieces on the floor. His friend Dylan is standing next to him when he finds them. Chris can offer Dylan nothing at all, one of the fifty-pence pieces, or both. Dylan observes the offer made by Charlie, and can either accept the offer (in which case they each receive the split specified by Charlie) or reject the offer.If he rejects the offer, each player gets nothing at all (because Charlie is embarassed and throws the moneyaway).(a) Formulate this interaction as an extensive-form game. To keep things simple, players’ payoff is equal to their monetary gain.(b) List all histories of the game. Split these into terminal and non-terminal histories.(c) What are the strategies available to Charlie? What are the strategies available to Dylan? Draw the strategic-form game.(d) Find the pure-strategy Nash equilibria of this game.(e) What do you think will happen?
The following represents the potential outcomes of your first salary negotiation after graduation: Assuming this is a sequential move game with the employer moving first, indicate the most likely outcome. Does the ability to move first give the employer an advantage? If so, how? As the employee, is there anything you could do to realize a higher payoff?
The Gulf Cartel and Sinaloa Cartel are the two major cartels in illegal drug trade in Mexico. Although, each of these cartels are better off sharing the market, they have an incentive to try to take the entire market. In which of the following ways is cheating among these cartel members dealt with in this region?
Present an example of a prisoner’s dilemma in your own life. Describe the “cooperative” action for each player that involves trusting the other in some sense. Explain why mutual cooperation will lead to an outcome that is preferred to mutual defection. Describe why there is an incentive for each to defect, or not cooperate, or not be trustworthy. Discuss what might be done to promote mutual cooperation, or what is done.
5. Devin and Giannis consume books and videos. Devin has the endowment (30, 8) while Giannis has (50, 12). Each has the utility function u(b, v) = 4vb + 4vv. (i) Sketch the Edgeworth Box. (ii) Find the equation for the contract curve. (iii) If pv = 1, what is the equilibrium value of pB? (iv) Now suppose that Devin and Giannis both have the utility function u(b, v) = min{½b, v} instead. If pv = 1, what is the equilibrium value of pB?
Topic B Problem: Imagine you have two competing athletes who have the option to use an illegal and/or dangerous drug to enhance their performance (i.e., dope). If neither athlete dopes, then neither gains an advantage. If only one dopes, then that athlete gains a massive advantage over their competitor, reduced by the medical and legal risks of doping. However, if both athletes dope, the advantages cancel out, and only the risks remain, putting them both in a worse position than if neither had been doping. What class concept best describes this situation? Using this class concept, what outcome do we expect from these two athletes? Are there any factors that could change the outcome predicted by this course concept?
Explain how the number of bidders in a common value auction affects the outcome of the auction. Relate this to the effect on price in different market structures based on the number of producers.
Gerald Scully estimated the difference between player pay and player revenue production. Briefly explain why and how he did this and describe his results.
In labor-management relations, both labor and management can adopt either a friendly or hostile attitude. The results are shown in the following payoff matrix. The numbers give the wage gains made by an average worker. Is this game strictly determined? Management Labor Friendly Hostile Friendly 500 400 Hostile 700 1300 Select the correct choice below and, if necessary, fill in the answer box to complete your choice. O A. Yes, this game is strictly determined. The saddle point is attitude. B. Yes, this game is strictly determined. The saddle point is attitude. C. Yes, this game is strictly determined. The saddle point is attitude. D. Yes, this game is strictly determined. The saddle point is attitude. O E. No, this game is not strictly determined. . The optimum strategy for labor is to adopt a friendly attitude. The optimum strategy for management is to adopt a friendly The optimum strategy for labor is to adopt a hostile attitude. The optimum strategy for management is to adopt a…
We will loosely model the petrol crisis the UK has recently experienced as a game. Start with a two-player case. Assume that there are two people living on an island and each person has two actions: keep buying petrol as normal or rush to the petrol station and fill up the tank. When both players buy as normal, the petrol supply would be enough for the two, and hence no single player has any incentives to rush. In fact, when all players keep buying as normal, rushing unilaterally will incur a small cost (e.g. one has to give up their normal routine, go to the gas station with half full tanks etc.). If one player rushes, however, the other has incentives to do so too, for waiting when the other player rushes results in the worst outcome for the player who waits. Create a game using this scenario assuming that players decide simultaneously. Assign payoffs for all possible strategy combinations, carefully arguing and justifying why you assigned a particular payoff to a particular strategy…
Refer to the images 'Facebook versus Google Plus'. And answer the question below Why did Google Plus fail as a social networking site?