ppose that we would like to select between two prediction models, M₁ and M₂. We have performed rounds of 10-fold cross validation on each model, where the same data partitioning in round i is ed for both M₁ and M₂. The error rates obtained for M₁ are 30.5, 32.2, 20.7, 20.6, 31.0, 41.0, 27.7, 0, 21.5, 26.0. The error rates for M₂ are 22.4, 14.5, 22.4, 19.6, 20.7, 20.4, 22.1, 19.4, 16.2, 35.0. omment on whether one model is significantly better than the other considering a significance level 1%.

ppose that we would like to select between two prediction models, M₁ and M₂. We have performed rounds of 10-fold cross validation on each model, where the same data partitioning in round i is ed for both M₁ and M₂. The error rates obtained for M₁ are 30.5, 32.2, 20.7, 20.6, 31.0, 41.0, 27.7, 0, 21.5, 26.0. The error rates for M₂ are 22.4, 14.5, 22.4, 19.6, 20.7, 20.4, 22.1, 19.4, 16.2, 35.0. omment on whether one model is significantly better than the other considering a significance level 1%.

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Given the following accuracy rates for k-fold cross-validation with k = 4, which model will we choose to mal accuracy rate for that model? Observations in the Validation Set 301-400 201-300 101-200 1-100 Multiple Choice Model 1; 69.7% Model 2; 70.5% Model 1 69.5% 70.2% 71.8% 67.3% Model 2 72.2% 68.9% 71.5% 69.4% Nathanie
Consider a dataset with 1000 observations, each observation consisting of 4 predictors (x1, x2, x3, x4), and a response variable (y), which is one of 2 possible labels ("Yellow, or 'Red'). If k-Nearest Neighbours (using squared Euclidean distance) withk 5 were used to make a prediction for a new observation, how many times would the squared euclidean distance formula be used? 1000
Investigate each of the forty delivery time observations. Delete at random ten percent (4) of the observations. Calculate R2 and make a prediction based on the four values that were deleted. Recalculate 100 times. Estimate R2's value. What kind of impact does this have on the model's prediction? How does the mean of the 100R2 prediction values compare to the R2 that is derived from the PRESS for each of the 40 observations?
A dataset consists of 1,000 elements. Using cross-validation, the sample error rate of hypothesis h1 is found to be 0.07 and that of hypothesis h2 is 0.11. Give the confidence intervals of the two errors and comment how that relates to the statistical difference between the results. ZN =1.96 for a confidence level of 95%.
We created some models for a dataset and, for each model we computed its R2 score. The results are presented in the table below: Model m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 R2 0.85 0.76 0.87 0.68 0.79 What model should we use from the ones presented in the table? Justify your answer. Answer:
Consider each of the 40 delivery time observations. Delete 10% (4) of the observations at random. Predict the four values removed and calculate R2. Recalculate 100 times. Forecast R2. What effect does this have on model prediction? How does the mean of 100R2 prediction values compare to the R2 derived from PRESS for all 40 observations?
Considering the threshold as 0.5, Calculate the F1 measure for attached predictions of a classification model. Group of choice: A. 1 B. 0.45 C. 0.67 D.0.53
Consider all 40 observations on the delivery time data. Delete 10% (4) of the observations at random. Fit a model to the remaining 36 observations, predict the four deleted values, and calculate R^2 for prediction. Repeat these calculations 100 times. Calculate the-average R^2 for prediction. What information does this convey about the predictive capability of the model? How does the average of the 100R^2 for prediction values compare to R^2 for prediction based on PRESS for all 40 observations?
Which statement about k-fold cross-validation is FALSE? Group of answer choices is typically used to tune and select the best hyper-parameters for the model On each step, one fold is used as the training data and the remaining k − 1 folds are used as testing data partitions the data into k non-overlapping folds The last step of the k-fold cross-validation is to compute the average performance estimate All observations are used for both training and validation
A centered dataset with n = 80 observations and p = 5 variables was analysed to reduce its dimensionality. As part of Principal Component Analysis, the following variance-covariance matrix was generated 993.944 194.202 26.336 15.803 41.983 194.202 228.703 -32.782 26.336 -32.782 241.454 15.803 −1.11 3.163 41.983 36.289 -7.056 19.991 250.303 −1.11 36.289 3.163 -7.056 239.633 19.991 A) Compute and write the numerical value of the eigenvalue 14 of Σ. This eigenvalue is located in the position (4, 4) of the matrix ▲ and is simultaneously the sample variance of the score PC4: B) Compute and write the percentage of total variability explained by the Principal component PC4. The number you write should be between 0 and 100 and you should include decimals in your answer.
Suppose, you have trained a k-NN model and now you want to get the prediction on test data. Before getting the prediction suppose you want to calculate the time taken by k-NN for predicting the class for test data.Note: Calculating the distance between 2 observation will take D time. What would be the relation between the time taken by 1-NN,2-NN,3-NN?
A high bias model has a high unpredictable error, while a high variance model has a high systematic error. Select: True or False?