use this Literature value FeSCN2+ = 8.9X10^2and solve for part C-2. Please type the answers. Table 2: Determination of K; based on Absorbance valuesAbsorbanceEquilibriumEquilibriumatEquilibriumConcentrationConcentrationTestAmax fromConcentrationof Fe3+of SCN-KETubeData Table 3.of FESCN2+ (M)(M)(M)10.3694.80X 10-55.52 X 10 *-4-43.52 X 102.47 X 10 220.574-59.10 X 105.09 X 10 -ª5. 09X 10 -43.51 X 10 2-41.26 X 10-44.74 X 10 ~3.53 X 1020.742-47.52 X 1040.8521.49 X 10~44.51 X 10 -48.51 X 10-43.88 X 102Report an average K (with temperature in Kelvin)3.35 X 10 2at 295.6 KInsert sample calculation on the next page. Type your values into the table. Part C-2. Conclusion and Comparison to literature valueReport an average Kf and compare to the literature value. Find the Kt for theformation of FESCN2+ and cite your reference. The error is likely to be high.Explain any sources of error.Please type your response here.

Average Kf value =3.35×102Literature value of Kf=8.9×102 Thus, % error in the determination of Kf: =Average Kf-Literature KfLiterature Kf×100%=(3.35×102)-(8.9×102)8.9×102×100%=62.4 % Thus, there's an error of 62.4% in the determined value of Kf. Possible sources of errors: 1. Concentrations of supplied Fe(NO3)3 and KSCN stock reagents 2. Error in the calibrated volume of micropipettes used for measuring the volumes of reagents 3. Error in the calibration of spectrophotometer (might give wrong absorbance values of solutions prepared)