ng country service sector workers who would be glad to come to vely higher wages. This effectively means that highly paid professionals get to enjoy the benefits of cheaper imported goods, w ed salaries. This has exacerbated inequality in the U.S. due to the fact that manufacturing workers who have effectively had the mave to pay for expensive professional services that have not commensurately come down. This is not only economically ineffic to the fact that lawyers are the ones who actually author free trade agreements and corporate and special interest groups repr I service sector are usually at the negotiating table when they are being authored. s have some of the highest salaries in therworld as evidenced by the graph below that compares general practitioner pay amon untries: data is old due the fact that the American Medical Association (AMA) no longer collects earnings data for general practitione muneration of GPs in USD PPP, selected OECD countries, 2004 (or closest year available) United States (2003r 146 United Kingdom (2004)* 121 Netherlands (2004y 120 Germany (2004) kceland (2005) Austria 2003y* 112 109 108 Luxembourg (2003r 108 aitzedand 2003* 108

Microeconomics A Contemporary Intro
10th Edition
ISBN:9781285635101
Author:MCEACHERN
Publisher:MCEACHERN
Chapter21: Economic Development
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 13PAE
icon
Related questions
Question
Preface:
For years free trade agreements have put manufacturing workers in the U.S. in direct competition with their developing country counterparts with the
purpose of driving down wages in the U.S. and bringing in cheaper imported goods. All the while highly paid service sector workers such as lawyers,
doctors, CPAS, and the like are shielded from competition from developing country service sector workers who would be glad to come to the U.S. and
enjoy relatively higher wages. This effectively means that highly paid professionals get to enjoy the benefits of cheaper imported goods, while still having
their inflated salaries. This has exacerbated inequality in the U.S. due to the fact that manufacturing workers who have effectively had their wages driven
down still have to pay for expensive professional services that have not commensurately come down. This is not only economically inefficient it is ethically
wrong due to the fact that lawyers are the ones who actually author free trade agreements and corporate and special interest groups representing the
professional service sector are usually at the negotiating table when they are being authored.
U.S. doctors have some of the highest salaries in therworld as evidenced by the graph below that compares general practitioner pay amongst fellow OECD
member countries:
(Note: The data is old due the fact that the American Medical Association (AMA) no longer collects earnings data for general practitioners (GPs))
Figure 1. Remuneration of GPs in USD PPP, selected OECD countries, 2004 (or closest year available)
United States (2003)
146
United Kingdom (2004)
121
Netherlands (2004)
Germany (2004)
120
112
lceland (2005)
109
Austria (2003)*
108
Luxembourg (2003y
108
Switzerland (2003y**
108
Canada (2004)
106
France (2004)
84
Finland (2004)
56
ISelf-employed
Salaried
Czech Republic (2004)*
39
100
200
150
USD PPP, thousands
50
Transcribed Image Text:Preface: For years free trade agreements have put manufacturing workers in the U.S. in direct competition with their developing country counterparts with the purpose of driving down wages in the U.S. and bringing in cheaper imported goods. All the while highly paid service sector workers such as lawyers, doctors, CPAS, and the like are shielded from competition from developing country service sector workers who would be glad to come to the U.S. and enjoy relatively higher wages. This effectively means that highly paid professionals get to enjoy the benefits of cheaper imported goods, while still having their inflated salaries. This has exacerbated inequality in the U.S. due to the fact that manufacturing workers who have effectively had their wages driven down still have to pay for expensive professional services that have not commensurately come down. This is not only economically inefficient it is ethically wrong due to the fact that lawyers are the ones who actually author free trade agreements and corporate and special interest groups representing the professional service sector are usually at the negotiating table when they are being authored. U.S. doctors have some of the highest salaries in therworld as evidenced by the graph below that compares general practitioner pay amongst fellow OECD member countries: (Note: The data is old due the fact that the American Medical Association (AMA) no longer collects earnings data for general practitioners (GPs)) Figure 1. Remuneration of GPs in USD PPP, selected OECD countries, 2004 (or closest year available) United States (2003) 146 United Kingdom (2004) 121 Netherlands (2004) Germany (2004) 120 112 lceland (2005) 109 Austria (2003)* 108 Luxembourg (2003y 108 Switzerland (2003y** 108 Canada (2004) 106 France (2004) 84 Finland (2004) 56 ISelf-employed Salaried Czech Republic (2004)* 39 100 200 150 USD PPP, thousands 50
Read the following article on the issues surrounding the international medical graduate licensing process:
Path to United States Practice Is Long Slog to Foreign Doctors.pdf
Answer the following questions:
1. Do you think the licensing process for international medical graduates is an unnecessary hurdle meant to shield U.S. doctors from foreign competition?
If so explain why. If not explain why. Please reference the article in your response.
2. Suppose we increase the overall number of doctors in the U.S. in all fields and specialties of medical practice by equal percentages, which would shift
the supply curves in all the respective medical practice markets. Suppose we were to analyze two separate medical practice markets:
1. Plastic Surgery
2. Cardiology
Which markets' price would be most impacted by this increase in the supply of doctors? Which markets' quantity would be most impacted by this increase
in the supply of doctors?
Explain your reasoning using economic logic learned in chapter 6. You may use the formulas or graphs from chapter 6 to explain your position, however, it
is not required.
Transcribed Image Text:Read the following article on the issues surrounding the international medical graduate licensing process: Path to United States Practice Is Long Slog to Foreign Doctors.pdf Answer the following questions: 1. Do you think the licensing process for international medical graduates is an unnecessary hurdle meant to shield U.S. doctors from foreign competition? If so explain why. If not explain why. Please reference the article in your response. 2. Suppose we increase the overall number of doctors in the U.S. in all fields and specialties of medical practice by equal percentages, which would shift the supply curves in all the respective medical practice markets. Suppose we were to analyze two separate medical practice markets: 1. Plastic Surgery 2. Cardiology Which markets' price would be most impacted by this increase in the supply of doctors? Which markets' quantity would be most impacted by this increase in the supply of doctors? Explain your reasoning using economic logic learned in chapter 6. You may use the formulas or graphs from chapter 6 to explain your position, however, it is not required.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Depreciation
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Microeconomics A Contemporary Intro
Microeconomics A Contemporary Intro
Economics
ISBN:
9781285635101
Author:
MCEACHERN
Publisher:
Cengage
Principles of Economics 2e
Principles of Economics 2e
Economics
ISBN:
9781947172364
Author:
Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:
OpenStax
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506381
Author:
James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
MACROECONOMICS
MACROECONOMICS
Economics
ISBN:
9781337794985
Author:
Baumol
Publisher:
CENGAGE L
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa…
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506893
Author:
James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa…
Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506756
Author:
James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning