Natalie entered a raffle recently and never checked her tickets. She has recently learned the exact number of the other unchecked tickets. Based on this information she knows that there is a 30% chance that she has won the raffle prize of $1,600. If she does not win the raffle her wealth will be zero. Natalie has a von Neumann- Morgenstern utility such that she wants to maximize the expected value of cvc, where cc is total wealth. What is the minimum price for which Natalie would sell her raffle tickets? $

Natalie entered a raffle recently and never checked her tickets. She has recently learned the exact number of the other unchecked tickets. Based on this information she knows that there is a 30% chance that she has won the raffle prize of $1,600. If she does not win the raffle her wealth will be zero. Natalie has a von Neumann- Morgenstern utility such that she wants to maximize the expected value of cvc, where cc is total wealth. What is the minimum price for which Natalie would sell her raffle tickets? $

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

How do you solve this problem? (see attachment)
# 4 Consider an individual with a utility function of the form u(w) = √w. The individual has an initial wealth of $4. He has two investments options available to him. He can eitffer keep his wealth in an interest-free account or he can take part in a particularly generous lottery that provides $12 with probability of 1/2 and $0 with probability 1/2. Assume that this person does not have to incur a cost if he decides to take part in the lottery. (a) Will this individual participate in the lottery? (b) Calculate this individual's certainty equivalent associated with the lottery. What is his risk premium?
Veer
Lucy and Henry each have $1652. Each knows that with 0.1 probability, they will lose 85% of their wealth. They both have the option of buying a units of insurance, with each unit costing $0.1. Each unit of insurance pays out $1 in the event the loss occurs. The cost of the insurance policy is paid regardless of whether the loss is incurred. Lucy's utility is given by u²(x) = x, Henry's utility is given by u¹(x) = √√x. Answer the following: (If rounding is needed, only round at the end and write your answer to three decimal places.) a) Without insurance, what is the expected value of the loss? b) c) d). e) ( For Henry, facing the "lottery " above without any insurance is as bad as losing how many dollars for sure? Find Lucy's utility maximising choice of a. If more than 1 exist, enter the largest a. Now suppose insurance costs $0.2. Find Lucy's utility maximising choice of a. If more than 1 exist, enter the largest a. What is Henry's utility maximising choice of a with the new price of…
Setup from Question 1) An expected utility maximiser owns a car worth £60 000 and has a bank account with £20 000. The money in the bank is safe, but there is a 50% probability that the car will be stolen. The utility of wealth for the agent is u(y) = In(y) and they have no other assets. Question 2)
Suppose you have an exponential utility function given by U(x) =1- exp(-x/R) where, for you, R = 1000. Further, suppose you have an investment with a 50/50 chance of returning either 0 or 2000 dollars. Note U(0) = 0 and U(2000) = 0.865, so the utility of the lottery is 0.432. What is the certain equivalent of that investment?
David is an expected-utility maximizer that likes to drive fast (and reckless at times), so his probability of an accident is 2/3. David's preferences over wealth are u(w) = vw. Suppose that David's initial wealth is $100. If David has an accident, he incurs a $51 loss. How much is the risk premium David willing to pay to be as well off in case of accident or not?
Use the utility function u = E (r,) – 0.5 A o, where A is the risk aversion parameter and A = 3.5. Use the average annual return on the S&P 500 as E(r,). Use the average annual interest rate on the US Government 10-year treasury bond over the past decade as r Solve for the investor's optimal allocation between the risky and the risk-free asset.
An investor has preferences represented by a utility function u(c) and initial wealth w > 0. Consider an asset that pays G with probability \pi and B with probability 1-\pi. 1.1 Suppose the investor owns this asset. What is the minimum price he would sell it for? (It is sufficient to formulate the condition that this price must satisfy). 1.2 Suppose he does not own it. What is the maximum price he would be willing to pay to buy it? (It is sufficient to formulate the condition that this price must satisfy). 1.3 Explain why (or under which conditions) the buy and sell prices you have found are or are not the same. 1.4 Suppose w = 10, G = 10, B = 5 and u(c) = √c. Compute the buy and sell prices.
1 Q1. Jerry has wealth of $60 and derives utility from this according to the utility function U(w) = 1 - Where w is his wealth. Jerry now finds a lottery ticket (the drawing takes place the next day) that offers a 50% chance of winning $5. W a) What is the expected value of Jerry if he takes the lottery ticket? (pay attention, it's not jerry's wealth) b) What is the minimum amount for which Jerry would be willing-to-sell the ticket? (Hint: sets a price of p, and at the minimum amount, the expected utility of selling and not selling should be the same) c) Which is bigger, your answer to (a) or (b), and suggest whether Jerry is a risk averse person based on the previous conclusion? d) If he does not sell the ticket, what is Jerry's cost of risk? (The cost of risk is the difference between the expected wealth and the certainty equivalence)
Priyanka has an income of £90,000 and is a von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximiser with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility index . There is a 1 % probability that there is flooding damage at her house. The repair of the damage would cost £80,000 which would reduce the income to £10,000. a) Would Priyanka be willing to spend £500 to purchase an insurance policy that would fully insure her against this loss? Explain. b) What would be the highest price (premium) that she would be willing to pay for an insurance policy that fully insures her against the flooding damage?