Mr. Smith can cause an accident, which entails a monetary loss of $1000 to Ms. Adams. The likelihood of the accident depends on the precaution decisions by both individuals. Specifically, each individual can choose either “low" or "high" precaution, with the low precaution requiring no cost and the high precaution requiring the effort cost of $200 to the individual who chooses the high precaution. The following table describes the probability of an accident for each combination of the precaution choices by the two individuals. Adams chooses high precaution Adams chooses low precaution Smith chooses low precaution 0.8 0.5 Smith chooses high 0.7 0.1 precaution Question: For each of the following tort rules, (i) construct a table describing the individuals' payoffs under different precaution pairs and (ii) find the equilibrium precaution choices by the individuals. a) No liability b) Strict liability (with full compensation) c) Negligence rule (with efficient legal standard of care) d) Negligence with a defense of contributory negligence (with efficient legal standard of care)

Mr. Smith can cause an accident, which entails a monetary loss of $1000 to Ms. Adams. The likelihood of the accident depends on the precaution decisions by both individuals. Specifically, each individual can choose either “low" or "high" precaution, with the low precaution requiring no cost and the high precaution requiring the effort cost of $200 to the individual who chooses the high precaution. The following table describes the probability of an accident for each combination of the precaution choices by the two individuals. Adams chooses high precaution Adams chooses low precaution Smith chooses low precaution 0.8 0.5 Smith chooses high 0.7 0.1 precaution Question: For each of the following tort rules, (i) construct a table describing the individuals' payoffs under different precaution pairs and (ii) find the equilibrium precaution choices by the individuals. a) No liability b) Strict liability (with full compensation) c) Negligence rule (with efficient legal standard of care) d) Negligence with a defense of contributory negligence (with efficient legal standard of care)

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

please only do: if you can teach explain each part
Suppose that there is asymmetric information in the market for used cars. Sellers know the quality of the car that they are selling, but buyers do not. Buyers know that there is a 30% chance of getting a "lemon", a low quality used car. A high quality used car is worth $30,000, and a low quality used car is worth $15,000. Based on this probability, the most that a buyer would be willing to pay for a used car is $ 25500. (Enter your response rounded to the nearest dollar.) Which of the following would best "solve" the asymmetric information problem in this market? O A. Prohibiting the sale of low-quality cars. O B. High-quality sellers could offer warranties or product guarantees. OC. Low-quality sellers could establish industry standards. O D. It is not possible to solve the asymmetric information problem in this market.
The following table shows cost payoffs for four decision variables and four states of nature. S₁ S2 di 20 20 S S3 54 8 19 4 d2 12 12 40 d3 10 10 16 16 16 d4 30 30 25 20 20 9 110 14 14 Suppose the decision maker assigns the probability for S₁ = 0.10; S2 = 0.40; S3 = 0.20; and S4 = 0.30, what is the expected value of best decision? 21.2 21.8 20 19.2
Thelma is indifferent between $100 and a bet with a 0.6 chance of no return and a 0.4 chance of $200. If U(0) = 20 and U(200) = 220, then U(100) = :
Reactors `R’ Us operates a nuclear power plant in Potsdam.In the event of reactor failure, there would be major damages to the North Country. The company can reduce the probability of failure through proper maintenance of the facility. The marginal cost of maintenance is increasing in the amount of maintenance done (and thus decreasing in the probability of an accident). We can write this marginal cost curve as MAC=2-10p (where 0<p<1, and represents the probability of a failure over a 50 year period). The marginal expected damages are an increasing function of the probability of an accident so that MD=2.2+10p. Provide a graph or graphs to illustrate your analysis/answers to the following questions. A. What is the efficient probability of reactor failure? B. If “Reactors ‘R’ Us” thinks that, in the event of reactor failure, they will NOT be found liable for damages, what probability of failure will they choose? C. If “Reactors ‘R’ Us” thinks that, in the…
A driver's wealth $100,000 includes a car of $20,000. To install a car alarm costs the driver $1,750. The probability that the car is stolen is 0.2 when the car does not have an alarm and 0.1 when the car does have an alarm. Assume the driver's von Neumann- Morgenstern utility function is U(W) = In(W). Suppose the driver is deciding between the following three options: (a) purchase no car insurance, do not install car alarm; (b) purchase fair insurance to replace the car, do not install car alarm; and (c) purchase no car insurance, install car alarm. Of these three options, the driver prefers: A. option (a). B. option (b). C.option (c). D.options (a) and (b). E. options (a) and (c). F. options (b) and (c). G.all options equally. H.none of these options.
answer this properly, remember (0.35x50)+(0.65x10)=£24 here
Faris Co. and Fahad Co. are rivalry in Bahrain's market. Suppose the payoff to each of four strategic interactions are as follows: Faris Co. Response Action Reduce Price Don't Reduce Price Gain = BD 30,000 Reduce Price Loss = BD 1,000 Don't Reduce Price Loss = BD 5,000 No loss or gain The probability of Faris Co. to reduce price is 95 % (otherwise, probability of Faris Co. for not reducing price is 5 %), assume that Fahad Co. choose "reduce price" strategy a. What is size of loss from "reduce price" for Fahad Co.? b. What is size of gain from "don't reduce price" for Fahad Co? c. What is the expected payoff of a "reduce price" for Fahad Co.? and give an example (application) of d. Explain the concept of 'game theory' game theory Fahad Co. Response
Soft selling occurs when a buyer is skeptical of the usefulness of a product and the seller offers to set a price that depends on realized value. For example, suppose a sales representative is trying to sell a company a new accounting system that will, with certainty, reduce costs by 10%. However, the customer has heard this claim before and believes there is only a 20% chance of actually realizing that cost reduction and a 80% chance of realizing no cost reduction. Assume the customer has an initial total cost of $200. According to the customer's beliefs, the expected value of the accounting system, or the expected reduction in cost, is $____ . Suppose the sales representative initially offers the accounting system to the customer for a price of $12.00. The information asymmetry stems from the fact that the ______(sales rep or buyer) has less information about the efficacy of the accounting system than does the ______(sales rep or buyer) . At this price, the…
please send handwritten solution for Q3
1. Mr. Smith can cause an accident, which entails a monetary loss of $1000 to Ms. Adams. The likelihood of the accident depends on the precaution decisions by both individuals. Specifically, each individual can choose either "low" or "high" precaution, with the low precaution requiring no cost and the high precaution requiring the effort cost of $200 to the individual who chooses the high precaution. The following table describes the probability of an accident for each combination of the precaution choices by the two individuals. Adams chooses low precaution Adams chooses high precaution Smith chooses low precaution Smith chooses high precaution 0.8 0.5 0.7 0.1 1) What is the socially efficient outcome? For each of the following tort rules, (i) construct a table describing the individuals' payoffs under different precaution pairs and (ii) find the equilibrium precaution choices by the individuals. 2) a) No liability b) Strict liability (with full compensation) c) Negligence rule (with…
Max Pentridge is thinking of starting a pinball palace near a large Melbourne university. His utility is given by u(W) = 1 - (5,000/W), where W is his wealth. Max's total wealth is $15,000. With probability p = 0.9 the palace will succeed and Max's wealth will grow from $15,000 to $x. With probability 1 - p the palace will be a failure and he’ll lose $10,000, so that his wealth will be just $5,000. What is the smallest value of x that would be sufficient to make Max want to invest in the pinball palace rather than have a wealth of $15,000 with certainty? (Please round your final answer to the whole dollar, if necessary)