molecule proposed Lewis structure BH 3 XeO4 BF 3 HB H 1 H .. :0: : F - 8 :0−Xe=0: I :0: .. :F: B <-F: Is this a reasonable structure? If not, why not? Yes, it's a reasonable structure. No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: 0 Yes, it's a reasonable structure. No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: 0 Yes, it's a reasonable structure. No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: 0 * If two or more atoms have the wrong number of valence electrons around them, just enter the chemical symbol for the atom as many times as necessary. For example, if two oxygen atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them, enter the symbol O twice.

molecule proposed Lewis structure BH 3 XeO4 BF 3 HB H 1 H .. :0: : F - 8 :0−Xe=0: I :0: .. :F: B <-F: Is this a reasonable structure? If not, why not? Yes, it's a reasonable structure. No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: 0 Yes, it's a reasonable structure. No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: 0 Yes, it's a reasonable structure. No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: 0 * If two or more atoms have the wrong number of valence electrons around them, just enter the chemical symbol for the atom as many times as necessary. For example, if two oxygen atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them, enter the symbol O twice.

Chemistry

10th Edition

ISBN:9781305957404

Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste

Publisher:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste

Chapter1: Chemical Foundations

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1RQ: Define and explain the differences between the following terms. a. law and theory b. theory and...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

P ed Lewis structure Cl =0. :0 :Z: C=N :C=0: Is the proposed Lewis structure reasonable? Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:*
The Lewis structure of the CO3²- ion is OA) O B) O a OD) OE 10: .. 30% :0: C D: +0: 10 10: 10: 6:
From the Lewis structures of the species given, pick all of those in which the central atom obeys the octet rule. F.. H-C-H 1 H Br-Be-Br: :Ö-Se-F: F: None of the Above
u have good explanations
Recognizing exceptions to the octet rule Jacqueline Decide whether the Lewis structure proposed for each molecule is reasonable or not. Is this a reasonable structure? If not, why not? molecule proposed Lewis structure O Yes, it's a reasonable structure. O No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. IBr2 - I- Br: The correct number is:| O No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are:U O Yes, it's a reasonable structure. O No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. F- P - F: PF. The correct number is: :F: :F : O No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: O Yes, it's a reasonable structure. O No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. H-N-H NH, The correct number is:|| No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are:I * If two or more atoms have the wrong number of valence electrons around them, just…
4. Consider the following Lewis structures. •. :CI: Al F: H 0: :C- -Br Cl: .. .. Find the formal charge on each atom of each structure.
Give detailed Solution with explanation needed
A student is using the Lewis model of bonding to determine ways to predict bond types from Lewis structures. A Na: Ci : :NE N: B Which of the following parts of the model are best suited for predicting bond types shown above? O Part A and C, because it is showing charged particles from transferring electrons and therefore ionic. Part B and D, because it is describing a triple bond exist and therefore forming an ionic compound. Part A and C, because it is showing a sharing of the electrons by making an anion and cation. へ 58°F Clear K 99+ ト fs & 2$4 R Y. 00
Writing Lewis Structures Many Lewis structures can be drawn by inspection but a system helps to draw the more complex ones. One approach is too : 1. Draw a skeleton of the major (non-hydrogen) atoms with single bonds ( lines) between each one. Several general considerations will help produce a valid skeletal diagram. normal covalency number or number of bonds that each atom forms. Consider the For the major atoms these are : Element Bond(s) HYDROGEN 1 BORON 3 ALUMINUM 3 CARBON | 4 NITROGEN 3 OXYGEN 2 HALOGENS 1 Also note that hydrogen, boron, aluminum and the halogens seldom form multiple bond.
None
i need the answer quickly
None