Mo Salah, owner of Liverpool Limited, was approached by a local dealer in air conditioning units. The dealer proposed replacing the old cooling system of the company with a modern, more efficient system. The cost of the new system was quoted at R140 000, but it would save R30 000 per year in energy costa. The estimated life of the new system is 10 years, with no salvage value expected. All capital projects are required to earn at least the firms cost of capital at 10%. Required: Calculate the projects Internal Rate of Return (IRR).

Mo Salah, owner of Liverpool Limited, was approached by a local dealer in air conditioning units. The dealer proposed replacing the old cooling system of the company with a modern, more efficient system. The cost of the new system was quoted at R140 000, but it would save R30 000 per year in energy costa. The estimated life of the new system is 10 years, with no salvage value expected. All capital projects are required to earn at least the firms cost of capital at 10%. Required: Calculate the projects Internal Rate of Return (IRR).

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Salvage Co. is considering the purchase of a new ocean-going vessel that could potentially reduce labor costs of its operation by a considerable margin. The new ship would cost P500,000 and would be fully depreciated by the straight-line method over 10 years. At the end of 10 years, the ship will have no value and will be sunk in some already polluted harbor. The Salvage Co.'s cost of capital is 12 percent, and its marginal tax rate is 40 percent. The ship produces equal annual labor cost savings over its 10-year life. What is the present value of the depreciation tax benefit of the new ship? (Round to the nearest peso.) P200,000 P169,506 P282,510 P113,004
The ABC Ltd is analysing the costs and benefits of setting up an extra fast-food outlet in Adelaide. The predicted costs and income flows are provided below: $2 million site acquisition and development costs. The capital depreciation expense is $50,000 per year. Investment in plant and equipment of $600,000. The plant and equipment have an estimated useful life of 5 years and the residual value would be zero. The plant and equipment will be depreciated on a straight-line basis for tax purposes. The forecasted sales in year 1 is $600,000 and $800,000 per year thereafter. Labour and material costs are equivalent to 50 per cent of incremental sales. The policy (objective) is to sell the outlet at the end of year 3. The estimated selling price is $3.5 million. Sales in a similar outlet of ABC Ltd will decline by $80,000 per year due to loss of customers and experienced staff to the new venture. Other operating costs are about $150,000 per year (fixed) The net working capital requirement at…
A firm is considering purchasing equipment that will reduce annual costs by P 40,000. The equipment costs P 300,000 and has a salvage value of P 50,000 and a life of 7 yrs. The annual maintenance cost is P 6,000. While not in use by the firm, the equipment can be rented to others to generate an income of P 10,000 per year. If money can be invested for an 8% return, is the firm justified in buying the equipment? Use annual cost method.
A construction company is deciding to undertake a project. The project is quite profitable as it will generate net cash inflows of $20 million per year for 5 years. However, it will cause pollution to the nearby residents. The company can mitigate this pollution by investing additional 10 million at Year 0 but legally it is not compulsory for it to do so. Undertaking this project would cost $60 million without mitigation. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual cash inflows would be $22 million. The risk adjusted WACC is 12%. Calulate the Payback with and without mitgationwhat is the discounted payback with and without mitigation?Should the project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do mitigation? (hint: discuss all the criterias you have calculated in earlier parts)How should the environmental effects be dealt with when this project is evaluated
A Builder company is deciding to undertake a project. The project is quite profitable as it will generate net cash inflows of $20 million per year for 5 years. However, it will cause pollution to the nearby residents. The company can mitigate this pollution by investing additional 10 million at Year 0 but legally it is not compulsory for it to do so. Undertaking this project would cost $60 million without mitigation. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual cash inflows would be $22 million. The risk adjusted weighted average cost of capital is 12%. Calculate the Net Present Value and IRR with and without mitigation. Should the project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do mitigation?
A company is investing in a solar panel system to reduce its electricity costs. The system requires a cash payment of $125,374.60 today. The system is expected to generate net cash flows of $13,000 per year for the next 35 years. The investment has zero salvage value. The company requires an 8% return on its investments. Compute the net present value of this investment.
Carousel Company is considering a new capital investment. The following information is available on the investment. The cost of the machine will be $300,000. The annual cost savings if the new machine is acquired will be $80,000. The machine will have a 5-year life, at which time the terminal disposal value is expected to be $40,000. Carousel Company is assuming no tax consequences. Required: If Carousel Company has a required rate of return of 10%, which of the following is closest to the present value of the project? a. $3,264 b. $300,000 c. $24,836 d. $28,120
NUBD Co. has an opportunity to acquire a new machine to replace one of its present machines. The new machine would cost P90,000, have a five year life, and no estimated salvage value. Variable operating costs would be P100,000 per year. The present machine has a book value of P50,000 and a remaining life of five years. Its disposal value now is P5,000, but it would be zero after five years. Variable operating costs would be P125,000 per year. Ignore present value calculations and income taxes. Considering the five years in total, what would be the difference in profit before income taxes by acquiring the new machine as opposed to retaining the present one?
A construction company is deciding to undertake a project. The project is quite profitable as it will generate net cash inflows of $20 million per year for 5 years. However, it will cause pollution to the nearby residents. The company can mitigate this pollution by investing an additional 10 million at Year 0 but legally it is not compulsory for it to do so. Undertaking this project would cost $60 million without mitigation. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual cash inflows would be $22 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 12%. a) Calculate the NPV and IRR with and without mitigation.b) Should the project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do mitigation?
XXXX Contractors are preparing to replace critical earthmoving plants and equipment so that they can consolidate future bids. The anticipated cost of the digger with a maximum-sized bucket is £85,000. It needs to be bought in 4 years’ time. However, the industrial development fund is willing to loan XXXX contractors at a rate of 12% per annum if they can purchase the digger today. The accountant thinks there is a possibility of outright purchase of the digger in 4 years’ time if the company can create a sinking fund at a rate of 6% per annum Task: Explain how the financial health of XXXX contractors is able to influence the decision of outright purchase using a loan today or the creation of a sinking fund for the next 4 years
A firm is considering an investment in a new machine with a price of $15.9 million to replace its existing machine. The current machine has a book value of $5.7 million and a market value of $4.4 million. The new machine is expected to have a 4-year life, and the old machine has four years left in which it can be used. If the firm replaces the old machine with the new machine, it expects to save $6.45 million in operating costs each year over the next four years. Both machines will have no salvage value in four years. If the firm purchases the new machine, it will also need an investment of $280,000 in net working capital. The required return on the investment is 11 percent and the tax rate is 23 percent. The company uses straight-line depreciation. a)- What is the NPV of the decision to purchase the new machine? b) What is the IRR of the decision to purchase the new machine? c) WHat is the NPV of the decison to keep using the old machine? d) What is the IRR of the decison to keep…
Dog Up! Franks is looking at a new sausage system with an installed cost of $500,000. This cost will be depreciated straight-line to zero over the project's five-year life, at the end of which the sausage system can be scrapped for $74,000. The sausage system will save the firm $180,000 per year in pretax operating costs and the system requires an initial investment in net working capital of $33,000. If the tax rate is 24 percent and the discount rate is 9 percent, what is the NPV of this project? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16. Answer is complete but not entirely correct. S 119,822.41 NPV