Dune Ltd is considering a project that will require the use of a crane that cost £600,000 when it wasacquired four years ago and which has a current carrying amount (statement of financial position value)of £370,000. If the project is not undertaken, the crane could be sold for £180,000 or it could be used foranother project. If it is used for the other project, the business will not have to purchase another cranefor £250,000. The business uses the net present value (NPV) method to appraise investment projects.What is the relevant cost of the machine when calculating the NPV of the project?O a. £180,000O b. £370,000O c. £780,000O d. £250,000e. £600,000

Introduction:- NPV is Calculated by deducting present values of expected/projected cash outflows…

Dune Ltd is considering a project that will require the use of a crane that cost £600,000 when it was acquired four years ago and which has a current carrying amount (statement of financial position value) of £370,000. If the project is not undertaken, the crane could be sold for £180,000 or it could be used fo another project. If it is used for the other project, the business will not have to purchase another crane for £250,000. The business uses the net present value (NPV) method to appraise investment projects. What is the relevant cost of the machine when calculating the NPV of the project? O a. £180,000 O b. £370,000 O c. £780,000 O d. £250,000

Dune Ltd is considering a project that will require the use of a crane that cost £600,000 when it was acquired four years ago and which has a current carrying amount (statement of financial position value) of £370,000. If the project is not undertaken, the crane could be sold for £180,000 or it could be used fo another project. If it is used for the other project, the business will not have to purchase another crane for £250,000. The business uses the net present value (NPV) method to appraise investment projects. What is the relevant cost of the machine when calculating the NPV of the project? O a. £180,000 O b. £370,000 O c. £780,000 O d. £250,000

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The Wellington Construction Company is considering acquiring a new earthmover. The mover’sbasic price is $90,000, and it will cost another$18,000 to modify it for special use by the company.This earthmover falls into the MACRS five-yearclass. It will be sold after four years for $30,000. Thepurchase of the earthmover will have no effect onrevenues, but it is expected to save the firm $35,000per year in before-tax operating costs, mainly labor.The firm’s marginal tax rate (federal plus state) is40%, and its MARR is 10%.(a) Is this project acceptable, based on the mostlikely estimates given?(b) Suppose that the project will require an increasein net working capital (spare-parts inventory) of$5,000, which will be recovered at the end ofyear 4. Taking this new requirement into account,would the project still be acceptable?(c) If the firm’s MARR is increased to 18% and withthe working capital requirement from (b) not ineffect, what would be the required savings inlabor so that the project…
1. Compute the expected net present value and comment on the acceptability of the project considering the associated risk.
Chadron Sports is considering adding a miniature golf course to its facility. The course would cost $138,000, would be depreciated on a straight-line basis over its five-year life, and would have a zero salvage value. The estimated income from the golfing fees would be $72,000 a year with $24,000 of that amount being variable cost. The fixed cost would be $11,600. In addition, the firm anticipates an additional $14,000 in revenue from its existing facilities if the golf course is added. The project will require $7,000 of net working capital, which is recoverable at the end of the project. What is the net present value of this project at a discount rate of 12 percent and a tax rate of 34 percent? O $14,438.78 $12,708.48 O $11,757.49 O $10,631.16 O $14,900.41
You are provided with the following details of a proposed investment in a new machine: The factory will cost £500,000 to acquire and install and will have a useful life of 20 years. At the end of the useful life of the machine, it is forecast that it can be sold for spare parts and scrap metal for £20,000. Depreciation is to be charged on a straight-line basis. If the machine is acquired, its production activity is forecast to generate revenue of £830,000 per year. The other annual costs, apart from depreciation, resulting from use of the machine are forecast to be You are provided with the following details of a proposed investment in a new machine: The factory will cost £500,000 to acquire and install and will have a useful life of 20 years. At the end of the useful life of the machine, it is forecast that it can be sold for spare parts and scrap metal for £20,000. Depreciation is to be charged on a straight-line basis. If the machine is acquired, its production activity is forecast…
You must evaluate a proposal to buy a new milling machine. The purchase price of the milling machine, including shipping and installation costs, is $162,000, and the equipment will be fully depreciated at the time of purchase. The machine would be sold after 3 years for $111,000. The machine would require a $9,000 increase in net operating working capital (increased Inventory less increased accounts payable). There would be no effect on revenues, but pretax labor costs would decline by $42,000 per year. The marginal tax rate is 25%, and the WACC is 11%. Also, the firm spent $4,500 last year investigating the feasibility of using the machine. a. How should the $4,500 spent last year be handled? 1. Last year's expenditure should be treated as a terminal cash flow and dealt with at the end of the project's life. Hence, it should not be included in the initial investment outlay. II. Last year's expenditure is considered an opportunity cost and does not represent an incremental cash flow.…
A firm is considering purchasing equipment that will reduce annual costs by P 40,000. The equipment costs P 300,000 and has a salvage value of P 50,000 and a life of 7 yrs. The annual maintenance cost is P 6,000. While not in use by the firm, the equipment can be rented to others to generate an income of P 10,000 per year. If money can be invested for an 8% return, is the firm justified in buying the equipment? Use annual cost method.
XYZ operates indoor tracks. The firm is evaluating the Santa Fe project, which would involve opening a new indoor track in Santa Fe. During year 1, XYZ would have total revenue of $168,000 and total $78,000 if it pursues the Santa Fe project, and the firm would have total revenue of $156,000 and total costs of $71,400 if it does not pursue the Santa Fe project. Depreciation firm would $76,400 if the firm pursues the project and $39,100 if the firm does not pursue the project. The tax rate is 44.70%. What is the relevant operating cash flow (OCF) for year 1 of the Santa Fe project that should use in its NPV analysis of the Santa Fe project? taken by the O $29,640.70 (plus or minus $1) O $43,900.00 (plus or minus $1) O $24,240.70 (plus or minus $1) O $19,659.30 (plus or minus $1) O None of the above is within $1 of the correct answer costs of be XYZ
GRIP Industries is considering a new assembly line costing RM1,600,000. The instaliation will ncur a cost of RM350,000 and after-tax training cost of RM105,000. The assembly line will be fuly depreciated using the simplified straight-ine method over its 3- year depreciable life. Net working capital is expected to increase by RM420,000 at start and the full amount ill be recovered at the end of up year 3. First year sales are estimated to be RM1,800,00, and illincrease by RM200,000 each year throughout the 3-year period. Variable cost is 55% from sales, while fixed cost takes up RM225,000 per year. At terminal, the assembly line can be sold at RM700,000. GRIP is in the 35 percent tax bracket and has a required rate of returm of 12% A) Calculate the total initial outlay of the project. B) Determine the annual cash flow for the project from year 1 to year 3. C) Calculate the terminal cash flow at year 3. D) Calculate the net present value (NPV) and intermal required rate of return (IRR)…
A construction company is deciding to undertake a project. The project is quite profitable as it will generate net cash inflows of $20 million per year for 5 years. However, it will cause pollution to the nearby residents. The company can mitigate this pollution by investing additional 10 million at Year 0 but legally it is not compulsory for it to do so. Undertaking this project would cost $60 million without mitigation. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual cash inflows would be $22 million. The risk adjusted WACC is 12%. Calulate the Payback with and without mitgationwhat is the discounted payback with and without mitigation?Should the project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do mitigation? (hint: discuss all the criterias you have calculated in earlier parts)How should the environmental effects be dealt with when this project is evaluated
A Builder company is deciding to undertake a project. The project is quite profitable as it will generate net cash inflows of $20 million per year for 5 years. However, it will cause pollution to the nearby residents. The company can mitigate this pollution by investing additional 10 million at Year 0 but legally it is not compulsory for it to do so. Undertaking this project would cost $60 million without mitigation. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual cash inflows would be $22 million. The risk adjusted weighted average cost of capital is 12%. Calculate the Net Present Value and IRR with and without mitigation. Should the project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do mitigation?
Normally, JC Corporation pursue a project only if the payback period is not more than 50% of the project's useful life. However the accounting manager suggested that investment decision should not be based only on payback period. Currently, the company is considering to purchase a new machine that will provide annual cash flow of P1,500,000 in the first year of use, P1,200,000 in its second year of use, P1,000,000 in the third year, and P740,000 in each year of the remaining of 8 years life of the project. The machine cost P5,600,000 and could be sold for P2,500,000 after its useful life. The company's cost of capital is 12%. As the investment analyst of the company which of the Payback Method and the Present Value Method would you recommend to become the basis for pursuing the project? Explain your answers. Support your recommendation with computed values.
Rader Railway is determining whether to purchase a new rail setter, which has a base price of $425,000 and would cost another $44,000 to install. The setter will be depreciated according to the MACRS 3-year class of assets, and it would be sold after three years for $210,000. Using the setter requires a $29,000 increase in net working capital. Although it would have no effect on revenues, the setter should save the firm $161,000 per year in before-tax operating costs (excluding depreciation). Rader's marginal tax rate is 40 percent, and its required rate of return is 12 percent. Should the setter be purchased? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to the nearest cent. Use a minus sign to enter a negative value, if any. The setter_____ be purchased because the net present value________, that is $ , is zero.