Microsoft and a smaller rival often have to select from one of two competing technologies, A and B. The rival always prefers to select the same technology as Microsoft (because compatibility is important), while Microsoft always wants to select a different technology from its rival. If the two companies select different technologies, Microsoft's payoff is 4 units of utility, while the small rival suffers a loss of utility of 2. If the two companies select the same technology, Microsoft suffers a loss of utility of 2 while the rival gains 2 units of utility. Using the given information, fill in the payoffs for each cell in the matrix, assuming that each company chooses its technology simultaneously. Rival Technology A Rival: Technology B Rival: Technology A Microsoft Microsoft Microsoft Rival: Rival: Technology B Microsoft Microsoft

Microsoft and a smaller rival often have to select from one of two competing technologies, A and B. The rival always prefers to select the same technology as Microsoft (because compatibility is important), while Microsoft always wants to select a different technology from its rival. If the two companies select different technologies, Microsoft's payoff is 4 units of utility, while the small rival suffers a loss of utility of 2. If the two companies select the same technology, Microsoft suffers a loss of utility of 2 while the rival gains 2 units of utility. Using the given information, fill in the payoffs for each cell in the matrix, assuming that each company chooses its technology simultaneously. Rival Technology A Rival: Technology B Rival: Technology A Microsoft Microsoft Microsoft Rival: Rival: Technology B Microsoft Microsoft

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

John and Daniel greatly enjoy each other's company but have different tastes regarding the best form of entertainment. John prefers the lowbrow entertainment of professional wrestling that disgusts Daniel. Meanwhile, Daniel likes highbrow opera, which bores John. However, each finds it preferable to spend the evening together rather than disagree about what to do and end up staying home angry. This interaction is modeled in the normal-form game below: Evening Entertainment John Wrestling Opera 1st attempt Daniel Wrestling 36.00, 12.00 0,0 Opera 0,0 6.00, 18.00 Identify any pure strategy equilibria of this game. Choose one or more: OA. (wrestling, wrestling) B. (wrestling, opera) OC. (opera, wrestling) OD. (opera, opera) O E. There are no pure strategy equilibria. See Hint
Suppose that two clothing manufacturers, Lands’ End and L.L. Bean, are deciding what price to charge for very similar field coats. The cost of producing these coats is $100. The coats are very close substitutes, so customers flock to the seller that offers the lowest price. If both firms offer identical prices, each receives half the customers. For simplicity, assume that the two firms have the choice of pricing at prices of $103, $102, or $101. The profit each firm would earn at various prices (Lands’ Ends Profit, LL Bean’s Profit) is attached in the payoff matrix below: a.) What is the Nash equilibrium and expected profits to LL Bean and Lands’ End of this game? b.) Suppose this is a mixed strategy game in which LL Bean has a 25% percent chance of choosing a priceof $101, a 25% chance of choosing price of $102, and a 50% chance of choosing $103, while Lands End has a1/3 chance of choosing each strategy. What’s the expected payoff to LL Bean? c.) Suppose that in hopes of raising…
There are two firms in the market. Denote the price and the quantity of firm j by p; and q; , respectively. Those two products are differentiated and the demand system is given by 91 = 100 – 2p1 + P2 92 = 100 + pi – 2p2 For simplicity, assume zero production costs, meaning that profit is equal to revenue. Consider the two-stage game in which firm 1 decides the price first and then firm 2 choose its price after observing firm 1's price. If firm 1's price is 24, what is the best response price of firm 2? Report only the value . Answer:
Consider two firms choosing quantities sequentially in a duopoly setting (i.e. the Stackelberg game). The two firms have identical products. Each firm has no fixed costs, and faces marginal costs equal to 5 plus the quantity it produces (i.e. MC = 5 + q). Market demand is given by Q = 46 - P, where Q is market quantity and P is market price. In equilibrium, how much will the firm that moves first produce?
Brian and Matt own the only two bicycle repair shops in town. Each must choose between a low price for repair work and a high price. The yearly economic profits from each strategy are indicated in Figure bellow. The upper right side of each rectangle shows Brian's profits; the lower left side shows Matt's profits. Matt's Actions Low Price High Price Low Price Brian's Actions $1,500 $1,500 $200 $3,000 High Price $5,000 $200 $4,000 $4,000 Which of the following statements is correct for a one-trial game? The market equilibrium price is the low price. A market equilibrium price cannot be established unless Brian and Matt collude. A market equilibrium price cannot be established unless Brian or Matt engages in tit-for-tat strategy. A market equilibrium price cannot be established without repeated trials. The market equilibrium price is the high price.
On a duopolistic market, two tobacco firms are considering separately whether or not to engage in a marketing campaign. The market share gained from advertising will depend on whether the other competitor also advertises. The payoffs in millions of pounds for the firms are displayed in the following payoffs table where the first figure in the bracket denotes the payoff to A, and the second figure the payoff to B. Firm B\Firm A Firm A advertises Firm A no advertising Firm B advertises (60,75) (20,150) Firm B no advertising (120, 25) (100,120) a. Is there a dominant strategy? If so, what is the dominant strategy? Explain the meaning of a dominant strategy. b. Is there a Nash equilibrium? If so, what is it? Explain briefly what this implies. Explain the concept of Nash equilibrium. c. Does this advertising game pose a prisoners' dilemma? Justify your answer and explain what this means for the case of making advertising in cigarettes illegal.
Two firms A and B produce a product jointly. The total value to the two firms from the joint venture is given by V = √iA + √iB where iA and iB are the firms’ respective investment levels. After the investment levels have been chosen, the firms divide V equally. a) Find the Nash equilibrium investment levels, and the payoffs for each firm. b) Suppose that A and B merge. Find the optimal investment levels and the payoffs for the merged firm. Do the firms benefit from the merger? Why?
Olivia is thinking about opening a new bakery (the entrant). There is already a bakery open in her neighborhood (the incumbent), and the owner of the incumbent bakery makes it clear that if Olivia enters the market, they will cut their prices in an attempt to drive the new bakery out of business. Based on the payoff matrix below, is the incumbent’s threat credible? That is, if Olivia opens a new bakery, will the incumbent actually lower their prices? Note: the entrant chooses the row, the incumbent chooses the column High price Low price Enter 1, 2 -1, 1 Don’t enter 0, 10 0, 1 a. Yes, the threat is credible b. No, the threat is not credible
Synergy and Dynaco are the only two firms in a specific high-tech industry. They face the following payoff matrix as they decide upon the size of their research budget: Dynaco's Decision Synergy's Decision Large Budget Large Budget $30 million, $20 million Small Budget $0, $30 million If Synergy believes Dynaco will go with a large budget, it will choose a budget. If Synergy believes Dynaco will go with a small budget, it will choose a budget. Therefore, Synergy a dominant strategy. O True Small Budget $70 million, $0 $50 million, $40 million If Dynaco believes Synergy will go with a large budget, it will choose a budget. If Dynaco believes Synergy will go with a small budget, it will choose a budget. Therefore, Dynaco a dominant strategy. O False True or False: There is a Nash equilibrium for this scenario. (Hint: Look closely at the definition of Nash equilibrium.)
A secluded off-ramp on a highway through the Prairie of Prax has two gas stations, the only gas stations for miles, Northgoings and Southgoings. Suppose Northgoings and Southgoings must simultaneously display their prices, choosing between a high price and low price gas. The payoff matrix for this game, showing potential daily profit, is displayed below. Assume both stations know all of the information in the matrix, and that this is a one-time payoff. Northgoings Decisions High Price Low Price N: $500 N: $800 High Price S: $400 S: $50 Southgoings Decisions N: $100 N: $250 Low Price S: $700 S: $200 (a) According to our model of game theory, Northgoings has a dominant strategy to [Select] (b) According to our model of game theory, Southlgoings has a dominant strategy to [ Select] V (c) According to our model of game theory, the competitive outcome, or Nash Equilibrium, Northgoings will earn [ Select] and Southgoings will earn [ Select] (d) On the other hand, if these two companies…
Alcoa and Kaiser, duopolists in the market for primary aluminum ingot, choose prices of their 500 foot rolls of sheet aluminum on the first day of the month. The following payoff table shows their monthly payoffs resulting from the pricing decisions they can make. Suppose Alcoa and Kaiser repeat their pricing decision on the first day of every month. Suppose they have been cooperating for the past few months, but now the manager at Kaiser is trying to decide whether to cheat or to continue cooperating. Kaiser’s manager believes Kaiser can get away with cheating for two months, but he also believes that Kaiser would be punished for the next two months after cheating. After punishment, Kaiser’s manager expects the two firms would return to cooperation. Kaiser’s manager ignores the time-value of money and does not discount future benefits or costs. 4. Suppose you were asked to manage a golf course that was currently charging a uniform price. Would you suggest that the course continue…
A country’s market for new motor vehicles is dominated completely by two firms, Fastcars Ltd and Slowcars Ltd. Market revenue is fixed at $10 billion. Each firm can choose whether to advertise. Advertising costs $1 billion for each firm that advertises. If one firm advertises and the other does not, then the firm that advertises receives 100% of market revenue and pays for its advertising. If both firms advertise, they split the market revenue 50:50 and pay for their respective advertising. If neither advertises, they split the market revenue 50:50 but without the expense of advertising. a) What strategy would you advise that Fastcars Ltd should follow? b) What would you predict will be the strategy chosen by each firm? c) Is there an outcome that would make both firms better off? In case you find that there is such an outcome, is it achievable?