Frank and Nancy met at a sorority sock hop. They agreed to meet for a date at a local bar the next week. Regrettably, they were so fraught with passion that they forgot to agree on which bar would be the site of their rendezvous. Luckily, the town has only two bars, Rizotti's and the Oasis. Having discussed their tastes in bars at the sock hop, both are aware that Frank prefers Rizotti's to the Oasis and Nancy prefer the Oasis to Rizotti's. In fact, the payoffs are as follows. If both go to the Oasis, Nancy's utility is 3 and Frank's utility is 2. If both go to Rizotti's, Frank's utility is 3 and Nancy's utility is 2. If they don't both go to the same bar, both have a utility of 0. There are two Nash equilibrium in pure strategies and a Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies where the probability that Frank and Nancy go to the same bar is 12/25. This game has two Nash equilibria in pure strategies and a Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies where each person has a probability of 1/2 of going to each bar. This game has a dominant strategy equilibrium. This game has no Nash equilibrium in pure strategies. This game has exactly one Nash equilibrium.

Frank and Nancy met at a sorority sock hop. They agreed to meet for a date at a local bar the next week. Regrettably, they were so fraught with passion that they forgot to agree on which bar would be the site of their rendezvous. Luckily, the town has only two bars, Rizotti's and the Oasis. Having discussed their tastes in bars at the sock hop, both are aware that Frank prefers Rizotti's to the Oasis and Nancy prefer the Oasis to Rizotti's. In fact, the payoffs are as follows. If both go to the Oasis, Nancy's utility is 3 and Frank's utility is 2. If both go to Rizotti's, Frank's utility is 3 and Nancy's utility is 2. If they don't both go to the same bar, both have a utility of 0. There are two Nash equilibrium in pure strategies and a Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies where the probability that Frank and Nancy go to the same bar is 12/25. This game has two Nash equilibria in pure strategies and a Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies where each person has a probability of 1/2 of going to each bar. This game has a dominant strategy equilibrium. This game has no Nash equilibrium in pure strategies. This game has exactly one Nash equilibrium.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In a two-player, one-shot, simultaneous-move game, each player can choose strategy A or strategy B. If both players choose strategy A, each earns a payoff of $400. If both players choose strategy B, each earns a payoff of $200. If player 1 chooses strategy A and player 2 chooses strategy B, then player 1 earns $100 and player 2 earns $600. If player 1 chooses strategy B and player 2 chooses strategy A, then player 1 earns $600 and player 2 earns $100. a. Write this game in normal form. b. Find each player’s dominant strategy, if it exists. c. Find the Nash equilibrium (or equilibria) of this game. d. Rank strategy pairs by aggregate payoff (highest to lowest). e. Can the outcome with the highest aggregate payoff be sustained in equilibrium? Why or why not?
LG and Samsung are both releasing a new smartphone at the same time. Each company is fairly well known, and they are both deciding between pursuing two advertising strategies. Each firm knows that its profits will be affected by its own decision and the decision of the competing firm. The payoff matrix contains the estimated profits for both companies for all possible strategies. Samsung's profits are in the lower (green) triangle of each cell and LG's profits are in the upper (blue) triangle of each cell. Profits (payoffs) are in millions of dollars. Samsung What is LG's dominant strategy? Strategy 2 Strategy 1 LG does not have a dominant strategy. What is the Nash equilibrium in this game? B There is not a Nash equilibrium. D A C Strategy 1 LG Strategy 2 A B $150 Strategy 1 $300 $150 $25 C D Strategy 2 $25 $75 $300 $75
Boeing and Airbus are the two primary producers of passenger aircraft. Both firms are preparing to announce their new long-distance jets. Each firm can design their plan to maximize comfort or the number of seats. If both firms choose to maximize the same characteristic they will sell 100 planes each and if they maximize different characteristics they will each sell 150 planes each. Both firms want to maximize sales. Draw a game tree and find the equilibrium strategies and payoffs. Show your work.
You have been texting with your friends trying to make plans for this evening. Your best friend Jocelyn is not sure if she will finish her homework in time to come out, but if she does, she wants to go to a new restaurant on the north end of town that you've both been wanting to try. Another group of friends is going to a restaurant on the south end of town, but you've already been to this restaurant and it was only okay. Overall, you would prefer to go to the restaurant with Jocelyn. But if Jocelyn isn't coming out, you would rather hang out with your friends than stay home. No one is returning your calls, but you need to get on the subway and head into town if you want to do anything this evening. You have to decide whether to head north or south. What can we say about a potential dominant strategy in this game? Instructions: In order to receive full credit, you must make a selection for each option. For correct answer(s), click the option once to place a check mark. For incorrect…
Two technology companies, Bapple and Hoogle, are interested in attracting more software engineers to work and are considering introducing a personal shopper for employees as a new perk. The following game depicts the strategic outcomes that result from the game. Increases in annual profits of the two growing technology companies are shown in the table below. Bapple Offer the new perk Do not offer the new perk A $80 million B $10 million C Hoogle $60 million D $30 million Offer the new perk Hoogle = $20 million Bapple = $30 million Hoogle = $60 million Bapple = $10 million Refer to the Table. If both companies follow a dominant strategy, Bapple's annual profit will grow by Use letters in alphabetical order to select options Do not offer the new perk Hoogle = $5 million Bapple = $80 million Hoogle = $40 million Bapple = $60 million
Aspen is in house arrest and is not allowed to buy stuff online. She wants a new iPhone and is willing to pay up to $5000 dollars for it. You and I both pay $1000 to buy an iPhone (Assume she only has the option to buy from one of us). Which one of the following statement is true about how much Aspen will pay for the iPhone? Competition between us will lead Aspen to pay 1200 dollars for the iPhone Competition between us will lead Aspen to pay $5000 dollars for the iPhone Aspen will pay exactly $1350 for the iPhone because her demand is inelastic Aspen will pay $5000 dollars for the iPhone, only if we can collude
After graduation from business school, Pete wanted to start a new business. In competition with another firm, he became involved in developing a new technology that would allow consumers to sample food over the Internet. Given the newness of this market, technological compatibility across firms is important. Pete’s firm, DigiOdor, is far advanced in developing its Sniff technology. His competitor, WebTaste, has been working on an incompatible technology, Smell. If they both adopt the same technology, Sniff or Smell, they each may gross $150 million from the developing industry. If they adopt different technologies, consumers will later decide to purchase neither product, leading to gross sales of $0 each. In addition to the above considerations, switching over to the other technology would cost WebTaste $100 million right away and DigiOdor $250 million. In other words, WebTaste would incur additional costs of $100 million if it switched to Sniff technology, and DigiOdor would incur…
Consider the two-round bargaining game. The minimum the seller will sell his home for 188,000 and the maximum the buyer is willing to pay is $200,000. Both players know these two amounts and are bargaining over the difference (M=$1200). Assume the disagreement values are zero for both players. Player 1 moves first by making a proposal and Player 2 can accept and reject. If player 2 rejects Player’s 1 proposal, then Player 2 gets to make a proposal, which Player 1 can reject and accept. The game is then over. Suppose the both players discount the future income at the rate d=0.2 per period. That is, $0.20 now is equivalent to $1,00 received next round. Find the equilibrium for this 2-round game. a) Draw the game tree b) What is the sale price of home? c)Which player gets the larger share of M?
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern play a game in which they simultaneously put down some number of coins with either a head or a tail showing on each coin. Rosencrantz puts down one coin and Guildenstern puts down two coins. Rosencrantz pays Guildenstern one dollar for each coin that shows the side that Rosencrantz played; for example, if Rosencrantz played a head and Guildenstern played a head and a tail, Rosencrantz would pay Guildenstern two dollars, since two heads were displayed among the three coins. a. Formulate a strategic game that represents this situation. b. Find all Nash equilibria of this game (including any mixed strategy equilibria). c. For each of the Nash equilibria in (b), give Guildenstern’s expected payoff.
You work for a marketing firm that has just landed a contract with Run-of-the-Mills to help them promote three of their products: splishy splashers, flopsicles, and cannies. All of these products have been on the market for some time, but, to entice better sales, Run-of-the-Mills wants to try a new advertisement that will market two of the products that consumers will likely consume together. As a former economics student, you know that complements are typically consumed together while substitutes can take the place of other goods. Run-of-the-Mills provides your marketing firm with the following data: When the price of splishy splashers increases by 10%, the quantity of flopsicles sold decreases by 26% and the quantity of cannies sold increases by 14%. Your job is to use the cross-price elasticity between splishy splashers and the other goods to determine which goods your marketing firm should advertise together. Complete the first column of the following table by computing the…
Suppose we have two ice cream sellers, Blue Cool Ice Cream and Red Mango Ice Cream, deciding where to locate along a 1 kilometer long linear beach. Beachgoers are uniformly spread out everywhere along the beach. They do not like walking, and they view the ice cream from the two sellers as homogenous goods. Because of this, they will always buy from the nearest seller. The sellers cannot choose their price, only the location. A strategy for a player in this game is a distance between 0m and 1000m, which represents where the player will locate. For example, a distance of 0m is a strategy. The payoffs are the percentages of the market that each seller captures (depending on their two strategies). For example, if Blue Cool chooses 0m and Red Mango chooses 1000m, their payoffs are 50% and 50%. If the two sellers locate at exactly the same spot, they share the market and get 50% each. Suppose each player can only choose from 5 locations: 0m, 250m, 500m, 750m, 1000m. Is playing 0m is a…
The dropdown options are "Cleans" or "Does not clean." thank you!