Consider the following strategic interaction between two players, Player 1 (P1) and Player 2 (P2). NOTE: The first number in each payoff pair noted below is P1's payoff and the second number is P2's payoff. P1 moves first and chooses between A and B. If P1 chooses B, the game ends, the payoffs are (3, 3). If P1 chooses A, then they play the following simultaneous move game: P2 D 1,4 1, 1 P1 G 2, 1 2, 4 Answer the following questions considering the whole game (starting with P1's choice between A and B as described above). i. This game has * subgames including the whole game itself. ii. Player 1 has • information sets and Player 2 has + information sets. ii. The Nash equilibrium of the last subgame is (are) O(F, C) O(F, D) O(G, C) OG, D) iv. The subgame perfect equilibrium of the whole game is(are) D(A/G, D) D(A/F, C) (B/G, D) O(B/G, C) O(B/F, C)

Consider the following strategic interaction between two players, Player 1 (P1) and Player 2 (P2). NOTE: The first number in each payoff pair noted below is P1's payoff and the second number is P2's payoff. P1 moves first and chooses between A and B. If P1 chooses B, the game ends, the payoffs are (3, 3). If P1 chooses A, then they play the following simultaneous move game: P2 D 1,4 1, 1 P1 G 2, 1 2, 4 Answer the following questions considering the whole game (starting with P1's choice between A and B as described above). i. This game has * subgames including the whole game itself. ii. Player 1 has • information sets and Player 2 has + information sets. ii. The Nash equilibrium of the last subgame is (are) O(F, C) O(F, D) O(G, C) OG, D) iv. The subgame perfect equilibrium of the whole game is(are) D(A/G, D) D(A/F, C) (B/G, D) O(B/G, C) O(B/F, C)

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A small community has 10 people, each of whom has a wealth of $3,000. Each individual must choose whether to contribute $300 or $0 to the support of public entertainment for their community. The money value of the benefit that a person gets from this public entertainment is one half of the total amount of money contributed by all individuals in the community. This game has a Nash equilibrium in which 5 people contribute $300 and for public entertainment and 5 people contribute nothing. This game has a dominant strategy equilibrium in which nobody contributes anything for public entertainment. This game has no Nash equilibrium in pure strategies, but has a Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies. This game has a dominant strategy equilibrium in which all 10 citizens contribute $300 to support public entertainment. This game has two Nash equilibria, one in which everybody contributes $300 and one in which no- body contributes $300.
Alice and Julia want to spend time together but have different preferences for their activities. They can choose between two options: going to a soccer game or watching a football game. Alice prefers football and Julia prefers the football game, but they both prefer being together over being apart. If they both choose to attend a soccer game then Julia receives a payoff of 2 and Alice a payoff of 1. If they both choose to attend a football game, then Julia receive a payoff of 1 and Alice a payoff of 2. If one chooses a football game and the other a soccer game then they both receive a payoff of O. The payout matrix below illustrates these payoffs. Which of the following statements are true: I. There is a dominant strategy II. A nash equilibrium exists where Alice attends a football game and Julia attends a soccer game III. A nash equilibrium exists where both friends attend a soccer game IV. Both attending a football game is a stable outcome. Alice Soccer Football Julia Soccer Football…
In the game shown below, Player 1 can move Up or Down, and Player 2 can move Left or Right. The players must move at the same time without knowledge of the other player’s move. The first payoff is for the row player (Player 1) and the second payoff is for the column player (Player 2). Solve each game using game theoretic logic. Player 2 Player 1 Left Right Up 7, 7 2, 9 Down 9, 2 1, 3
Cameron and Luke are playing a game called ”Race to 10”. Cameron goes first, and the players take turns choosing either 1 or 2. In each turn, they add the new number to a running total. The player who brings the total to exactly 10 wins the game. a) If both Cameron and Luke play optimally, who will win the game? Does the game have a first-mover advantage or a second-mover advantage? b) Suppose the game is modified to ”Race to 11” (i.e, the player who reaches 11 first wins). Who will win the game if both players play their optimal strategies? What if the game is ”Race to 12”? Does the result change? c) Consider the general version of the game called ”Race to n,” where n is a positive integer greater than 0. What are the conditions on n such that the game has a first mover advantage? What are the conditions on n such that the game has a second mover advantage?
Question 1 Consider the following game. Player 1 has 3 actions (Top, middle,Bottom) and player 2 has three actions (Left, Middle, Right). Each player chooses their action simultaneously. The game is played only once. The first element of the payoff vector is player 1’s payoff. Note that one of the payoffs to player 2 has been omitted (denoted by x). A) Suppose that the value of x is such that player 2 has a strictly dominant strategy. Find the solution to the game. What solution concept did you use to solve the game? B) Suppose that the value of x is such the player 2 does NOT have a strictly dominant strategy. Find the solution to the game. What solution concept did you use to solve the game?
Two hunters are on a stag hunt. They split up in the forest and each have two strategies: hunt for a stag (S), or give up the stag hunt and instead hunt for rabbit (R). If they both hunt for a stag, they will succeed and each earn a payoff of 9. If one hunts for stag and the other gives up and hunts for rabbit, the stag hunter receives 0 and the rabbit hunter 8. If both hunt for rabbit then each receives 7. Compute all Nash equilibria for this game, called 'The Stag Hunt', depicted below. Which of these equilibria do you think is most likely to be played? Why? S R S 9,9 8,0 R 0,8 7,7
Consider the following game matrix with two players- Player 1 and Player 2 with their respective strategies. Which of the following statements is correct such as x>y>b>a Players Player2 Player 1 A B C D (Y, Y) (b, x) (x, a) (AE) is the one of many Nash equilibria (C) is the unique Nash equilibria (C. D) is the unique Nash equilibria (A. E) and (B. F) are two Nash equilibria E (a, b) (x, y) (y, a) F (a,x) (a, b) (b, b)
Alice and Betsy are playing a game in which each can play either of two strategies, leave or stay. If both play the strategy leave, then each gets a payoff of $400. If both play the strategy stay, then each gets a payoff of $800. If one plays stay and the other plays leave, then the one who plays stay gets a payoff of $C and the one who plays leave gets a payoff of $D. When is the outcome where both play leave a Nash equilibrium? a) never, since 800 > 400 b) when 400 > C and D > 800 but not when 800 > D c) whenever 400 > C d) when D > C and C > 400 e) whenever d < 800
Consider the following sequential-move game: This game involves three players, each making sequential decisions. The game proceeds as follows: • Player 1 initiates the game by choosing between two actions: Left and Right. • Depending on Player 1's choice, Player 2 then decides, choosing between two actions, left (I) and right (`r`). • Finally, Player 3 makes the last move in the sequence, choosing between actions `a` and `b`. The payoffs are determined by the sequence of choices made by all three players. Each payoff is represented by the triplet (x,y,z), where x, y, and z denote the payoffs for Player 1, Player 2, and Player 3, respectively. For example, if Player 1 chooses 'Left', Player 2 chooses 'I', and Player 3 chooses `a` the resulting payoff would be (3,1,2). This indicates that Player 1 receives a payoff of $3, Player 2 receives a payoff of $1, and Player 3 receives a payoff of $2 for this particular sequence of actions. Left Player 2 Player 1 Right Player 2 Player 3 Player 3…
This is a connected question that requires the first answer to get the second. Thank you for your time.
Consider the two-round bargaining game. The minimum the seller will sell his home for 188,000 and the maximum the buyer is willing to pay is $200,000. Both players know these two amounts and are bargaining over the difference (M=$1200). Assume the disagreement values are zero for both players. Player 1 moves first by making a proposal and Player 2 can accept and reject. If player 2 rejects Player’s 1 proposal, then Player 2 gets to make a proposal, which Player 1 can reject and accept. The game is then over. Suppose the both players discount the future income at the rate d=0.2 per period. That is, $0.20 now is equivalent to $1,00 received next round. Find the equilibrium for this 2-round game. a) Draw the game tree b) What is the sale price of home? c)Which player gets the larger share of M?
The “research and development” game is best analyzed as a simultaneous move game, because the parties lack information about each other’s investment decisions. Which game (in the attachment) describes the “research and development game” properly? Remember that investment costs $6, and that this should be reflected, whenever appropriate, in the correct game matrix. (Note: Firm A chooses the row and Firm B chooses the column.)