Long-Term Performance Report Nabors Company had actual quality costs for the year ended June 30, 20x5, as given below. Prevention costs: Prototype inspection $ 380,000 Vendor certification 760,000 Total prevention costs $ 1,140,000 Appraisal costs: Process acceptance $ 395,000 Test labor 440,000 Total Appraisal costs $ 835,000 Internal failure costs: Retesting $ 227,500 Rework 455,000 Total internal failure costs $ 682,500 External failure costs: Recalls $ 293,750 Product liability 536,250 Total external failure costs $ 830,000 Total quality costs $3,487,500 At the zero-defect state, Nabors expects to spend $475,000 on prototype inspection, $95,000 on vendor certification, and $60,000 on process acceptance. Assume sales to be $3,000,000. Required: Question Content Area 1. Prepare a long-range performance report for 20x5. Enter all answers as positive amounts. If the budget variance amount is unfavorable select "Unfavorable" in the last column of the table. Select "Favorable" if it is favorable. Round percentage answers to two decimal places, if rounding is required. For example, 5.789% would be entered as "5.79". Enter "0" as the target cost amount if there would be no cost at the zero-defect state. Nabors CompanyLong-Range Performance ReportFor the Year Ended June 30, 20x5 blank Actual Costs Target Costs Budget Variance Favorable; or Unfavorable Prevention costs: blank blank blank blank $- Select - $- Select - $- Select - - Select - - Select - - Select - Total prevention costs $- Select - $- Select - $- Select - Appraisal costs: blank blank blank blank $- Select - $- Select - $- Select - - Select - - Select - - Select - Total appraisal costs $- Select - $- Select - $- Select - Internal failure costs: blank blank blank blank $- Select - - Select - $- Select - - Select - - Select - - Select - Total internal failure costs $- Select - - Select - $- Select - External failure costs: blank blank blank blank $- Select - - Select - $- Select - - Select - - Select - - Select - Total external failure costs $- Select - - Select - $- Select - Total quality costs $- Select - $- Select - $- Select - Percentage of sales - Select -% - Select -% - Select -% Question Content Area 2. Why are quality costs still present for the zero-defect state?
Long-Term Performance Report Nabors Company had actual quality costs for the year ended June 30, 20x5, as given below. Prevention costs: Prototype inspection $ 380,000 Vendor certification 760,000 Total prevention costs $ 1,140,000 Appraisal costs: Process acceptance $ 395,000 Test labor 440,000 Total Appraisal costs $ 835,000 Internal failure costs: Retesting $ 227,500 Rework 455,000 Total internal failure costs $ 682,500 External failure costs: Recalls $ 293,750 Product liability 536,250 Total external failure costs $ 830,000 Total quality costs $3,487,500 At the zero-defect state, Nabors expects to spend $475,000 on prototype inspection, $95,000 on vendor certification, and $60,000 on process acceptance. Assume sales to be $3,000,000. Required: Question Content Area 1. Prepare a long-range performance report for 20x5. Enter all answers as positive amounts. If the budget variance amount is unfavorable select "Unfavorable" in the last column of the table. Select "Favorable" if it is favorable. Round percentage answers to two decimal places, if rounding is required. For example, 5.789% would be entered as "5.79". Enter "0" as the target cost amount if there would be no cost at the zero-defect state. Nabors CompanyLong-Range Performance ReportFor the Year Ended June 30, 20x5 blank Actual Costs Target Costs Budget Variance Favorable; or Unfavorable Prevention costs: blank blank blank blank $- Select - $- Select - $- Select - - Select - - Select - - Select - Total prevention costs $- Select - $- Select - $- Select - Appraisal costs: blank blank blank blank $- Select - $- Select - $- Select - - Select - - Select - - Select - Total appraisal costs $- Select - $- Select - $- Select - Internal failure costs: blank blank blank blank $- Select - - Select - $- Select - - Select - - Select - - Select - Total internal failure costs $- Select - - Select - $- Select - External failure costs: blank blank blank blank $- Select - - Select - $- Select - - Select - - Select - - Select - Total external failure costs $- Select - - Select - $- Select - Total quality costs $- Select - $- Select - $- Select - Percentage of sales - Select -% - Select -% - Select -% Question Content Area 2. Why are quality costs still present for the zero-defect state?
Long-Term Performance Report Nabors Company had actual quality costs for the year ended June 30, 20x5, as given below. Prevention costs: Prototype inspection $ 380,000 Vendor certification 760,000 Total prevention costs $ 1,140,000 Appraisal costs: Process acceptance $ 395,000 Test labor 440,000 Total Appraisal costs $ 835,000 Internal failure costs: Retesting $ 227,500 Rework 455,000 Total internal failure costs $ 682,500 External failure costs: Recalls $ 293,750 Product liability 536,250 Total external failure costs $ 830,000 Total quality costs $3,487,500 At the zero-defect state, Nabors expects to spend $475,000 on prototype inspection, $95,000 on vendor certification, and $60,000 on process acceptance. Assume sales to be $3,000,000. Required: Question Content Area 1. Prepare a long-range performance report for 20x5. Enter all answers as positive amounts. If the budget variance amount is unfavorable select "Unfavorable" in the last column of the table. Select "Favorable" if it is favorable. Round percentage answers to two decimal places, if rounding is required. For example, 5.789% would be entered as "5.79". Enter "0" as the target cost amount if there would be no cost at the zero-defect state. Nabors CompanyLong-Range Performance ReportFor the Year Ended June 30, 20x5 blank Actual Costs Target Costs Budget Variance Favorable; or Unfavorable Prevention costs: blank blank blank blank $- Select - $- Select - $- Select - - Select - - Select - - Select - Total prevention costs $- Select - $- Select - $- Select - Appraisal costs: blank blank blank blank $- Select - $- Select - $- Select - - Select - - Select - - Select - Total appraisal costs $- Select - $- Select - $- Select - Internal failure costs: blank blank blank blank $- Select - - Select - $- Select - - Select - - Select - - Select - Total internal failure costs $- Select - - Select - $- Select - External failure costs: blank blank blank blank $- Select - - Select - $- Select - - Select - - Select - - Select - Total external failure costs $- Select - - Select - $- Select - Total quality costs $- Select - $- Select - $- Select - Percentage of sales - Select -% - Select -% - Select -% Question Content Area 2. Why are quality costs still present for the zero-defect state?
Nabors Company had actual quality costs for the year ended June 30, 20x5, as given below.
Prevention costs:
Prototype inspection
$ 380,000
Vendor certification
760,000
Total prevention costs
$ 1,140,000
Appraisal costs:
Process acceptance
$ 395,000
Test labor
440,000
Total Appraisal costs
$ 835,000
Internal failure costs:
Retesting
$ 227,500
Rework
455,000
Total internal failure costs
$ 682,500
External failure costs:
Recalls
$ 293,750
Product liability
536,250
Total external failure costs
$ 830,000
Total quality costs
$3,487,500
At the zero-defect state, Nabors expects to spend $475,000 on prototype inspection, $95,000 on vendor certification, and $60,000 on process acceptance. Assume sales to be $3,000,000.
Required:
Question Content Area
1. Prepare a long-range performance report for 20x5. Enter all answers as positive amounts. If the budget variance amount is unfavorable select "Unfavorable" in the last column of the table. Select "Favorable" if it is favorable. Round percentage answers to two decimal places, if rounding is required. For example, 5.789% would be entered as "5.79". Enter "0" as the target cost amount if there would be no cost at the zero-defect state.
Nabors CompanyLong-Range Performance ReportFor the Year Ended June 30, 20x5
blank
Actual Costs
Target Costs
Budget Variance
Favorable; or Unfavorable
Prevention costs:
blank
blank
blank
blank
$- Select -
$- Select -
$- Select -
- Select -
- Select -
- Select -
Total prevention costs
$- Select -
$- Select -
$- Select -
Appraisal costs:
blank
blank
blank
blank
$- Select -
$- Select -
$- Select -
- Select -
- Select -
- Select -
Total appraisal costs
$- Select -
$- Select -
$- Select -
Internal failure costs:
blank
blank
blank
blank
$- Select -
- Select -
$- Select -
- Select -
- Select -
- Select -
Total internal failure costs
$- Select -
- Select -
$- Select -
External failure costs:
blank
blank
blank
blank
$- Select -
- Select -
$- Select -
- Select -
- Select -
- Select -
Total external failure costs
$- Select -
- Select -
$- Select -
Total quality costs
$- Select -
$- Select -
$- Select -
Percentage of sales
- Select -%
- Select -%
- Select -%
Question Content Area
2. Why are quality costs still present for the zero-defect state?
Definition Definition Measure used to estimate the difference between the budgeted and annual proportion for a specific accounting year. A favorable budget variance refers to positive variances or gains, while unfavorable or negative variances refer to a shortfall in the budget. A budget variance is indicative of the instances where the actual costs incurred are higher or lower than the estimated costs.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.