Let's assume that the planet was originally orbiting around something with the mass of our Sun (and thus the mass of the planet is negligible). Now we will examine the case where the planet orbits a star with 8 times the mass of our Sun, but we will say that the dates listed in the diagram above are still accurate for indicating the planet's position as it orbits the new star. What does this imply must be true about about the size
Let's assume that the planet was originally orbiting around something with the mass of our Sun (and thus the mass of the planet is negligible). Now we will examine the case where the planet orbits a star with 8 times the mass of our Sun, but we will say that the dates listed in the diagram above are still accurate for indicating the planet's position as it orbits the new star. What does this imply must be true about about the size
Related questions
Question
Transcribed Image Text:►
D
C
E
B
June 11th
A
November 11th
Let's assume that the planet was originally orbiting
around something with the mass of our Sun (and thus
the mass of the planet is negligible). Now we will
examine the case where the planet orbits a star with 8
times the mass of our Sun, but we will say that the dates
listed in the diagram above are still accurate for
indicating the planet's position as it orbits the new star.
What does this imply must be true about about the size
of the semimajor axis of the planet in this case
compared to the original (aka what is the ratio between
the new semimajor axis and the old one)?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 2 images
