Answered: Larry, 17 years old, bought a moped… | bartleby

Related questions

Question

Larry, 17 years old, bought a moped from the RU-Ready-2-Drive Used Moped lot. The next day, he
accidentally ran the moped into a telephone pole and seriously damaged the vehicle. Larry transported
the damaged vehicle to RU-Ready-2-Drive and demanded a return on his money. Must RU-Ready-2-
Drive comply with his request? Explain

Expert Solution

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Blurred answer

Similar questions

Mary has lost her lamb. On Sunday, she ran an ad in the local paper offering $2000 to anyone who has information that would lead to the return of her lamb. On Monday, as he was leaving his village store on a four day business trip, Noah saw a lamb behind some barrels in the alley behind the store. Since he was late, he scribbled a note with the directionsBut Mary was not home. She wrote a note and stuck it under Mary's door. Mary was despondent about her lamb and spent Tuesday night commiserating with her. Mr Matilda's not returning home until Wednesday morning. Passing by the village store, however, she heard a little bleat and could hardly believe her eyes when she saw her beloved lamb standing in front of her. Nor did she notice that the lamb, hungrier than usual, ate Chili's note that was on the floor as they entered their house on Thursday. John remembered that he had seen a lamb at the village store earlier that week and hurried over to Mary's house, only to find the lamb already…
1. Happy Farms, Inc. ordered 1,000 gallons of a specialty pesticide, â€œBerry Good,â€ for its berry crop. The total price of the order was $15,000. Happy Farms paid $5,000 up front and promised to pay the balance upon delivery. JA changed the order to a newer product â€œVery Berry Goodâ€ without notice to or consents from Happy Farms. Upon delivery, the head farmer at Happy Farms, Allison Kagan, noted that the product was not the same as she ordered. Later that afternoon, Kagan notified JA that the pesticide was not what she had ordered and refused to pay the balance on the shipment. Happy Farms held the boxes of pesticide, but, to date, JA has not retrieved them. What are JAâ€™s legal options in this situation? 2. Martin Rupe worked as the manager of one of JAâ€™s retail outlets. A customer came in and offered to buy all remaining â€œBerry Goodâ€ pesticide for…
Nelson took her computer to ABC Computer for repairs. ABC repaired the computer at a cost of $350 and informed Nelson that her computer was ready. Before Nelson came to pick up her computer, ABC was burglarized and Nelson's computer was taken. ABC had a commonly-used alarm system that was operating properly on the night of the burglary, and all the doors and windows were properly secured. Nelson sued ABC for the cost of the computer. ABC denied any liability and counterclaimed for the $350 in repairs. Who will win? HINT: Address the Bailment Issue.Please use the IRAC format Issue: Call of the Question Rule: Rule of Law to be applied to properly answer the question Analysis: Applying the rule of law to the facts of the problem presented Conclusion: Answer to the Issue
Mary, a keen pottery collector, saw a notice in the Daily News for an auction at James Pottery Limited on September 30th 2022. She traveled 300 kilometers to attend the auction in order to bid for a particularly rare item the “Mozart Pottery”, specifically mentioned in the list of items to be auctioned. However, when she got to the auction site, she found a notice stating that the auction had been canceled. Mary thereafter proceeded to a nearby antique shop and saw on display in the window, the identical “Mozart Pottery” priced at $10,000. Mary told the shop owner, Anthony, that she was only willing to pay $8,000 for it. However, Anthony indicated that he is willing to sell the pottery for $9,500. Mary then indicated to him that she desires some time to think it over and after lunch she will advise him. Anthony subsequently, agreed not to sell the identified pottery, until she return after lunch. However, Anthony forgot his promised to Mary and sold it to John for $9,500 before…
Arvo Lake, a retired 71-year-old man, bought an air conditioner in May. The unit was installed and operated according to the manufacturer's specifications. Unbeknownst to Lake, the unit contained a hole in the refrigeration system that allowed Freon, the coolant, to escape from the unit. By August, the unit had ceased cooling, and Lake's residence reached a temperature of at least 96 degrees Fahrenheit. The heat caused Lake to suffer from hyperthermia, which caused circulatory failure and then death. The executor of Lake's estate sued the manufacturer of the air conditioner for damages resulting from breach of warranty.Was Lake's death a foreseeable consequence of the air conditioner's failure to operate properly?
A8
Explain the statutory interpretation tools in law for the following . " No parking allowed".
An individual who has liability, medical payments, uninsured motorist, other than collision, collision, crashed into a flower shop. Damage to the shop would be paid under which coverage? A- collision coverage B- uninsured motorist C- medical payments D- liability
The Case: Ben purchased a used Laptop from Smart store during the sales period. He asked the salesperson, Rodny, if the Laptop had ever been damaged. Rodny (the salesperson) had never seen the Laptop before that morning and knew nothing of its history but quickly answered Ben’s question by stating: ‘No. It has never been damaged’. In fact, the Laptop had been seriously damaged previously and, although repaired and bought during the sales, it was worth much less than the value Ben had paid. When Ben learned the truth, he wanted to return the Laptop. Smart store replied that he cannot do that because they have a legally binding agreement and as per the agreement the items purchased during the sales cannot be returned. Questions: A) Does the behavior of the salesperson, Rodny, constitute deception? If it constitutes deception please precise which type of deception and explain in detail all the elements of the type of deception selected. B) Decide, based on the analysis made under…
John Beck was injured at the Drive-Thru at Taco Bell when an impatient driver behind him fired his gun at John’s car. When would Taco Bell be liable for John’s injuries? a. Taco Bell would be liable if John was negligent. b. Taco Bell is always liable for John’s injuries because he is an invitee. c. Taco Bell could never be liable for John’s injuries. d. Taco Bell would be liable if the firing of the shot was foreseeable.
Sue was shopping at the dover mall. as she was walking to dicks sporting goods store, her watch fell off of her wrist. while trying on shoes, sue left her leather jacket in the store department. amy sfound sues watch. steve, a sales associate found her jacket. what kind of found property is sues watch? What kind of property is her jacket? What rights- if any- do amy and steve have regarding the property?
Should FedEx be liable for the alleged loss of valuable rare coins when FedEx did not know what the package contained. Rykard v. FedEx Ground Package System.

SEE MORE QUESTIONS