Is memory ability before a meal worse than after a meal? Ten people were given memory tests before their meal and then again after their meal. The data is shown below. A higher score indicates a better memory ability. Score on the Memory Test Before 61 72 63 58 78 77 58 67 77 67 a Meal After 60 62 68 71 78 71 71 74 75 69 a Meal Assume a Normal distribution. What can be concluded at the the a 0.05 level of significance? For this study, we should use Select an answer

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
**Interpret the p-value in the context of the study:**

- If the sample mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is the same as the sample mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal, and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal, then there would be a 20.1% chance of concluding that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is at least 2.1 points lower than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal.

- If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal, and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal, then there would be a 20.1% chance that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal would be at least 2.1 points lower than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal.

- There is a 20.1% chance that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is at least 2.1 points lower than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal.

- There is a 20.1% chance of a Type I error.

**Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study:**

- If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal, and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal, then there would be a 5% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the sample mean memory scores before and after a meal for these 10 people who were part of the study differ from each other.

- There is a 5% chance that the population mean memory score is the same before and after a meal.

- If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal, and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal, then there would be a 5% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the population mean memory score before a meal is lower than the population mean memory score after a meal.

- There is a 5% chance that
Transcribed Image Text:**Interpret the p-value in the context of the study:** - If the sample mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is the same as the sample mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal, and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal, then there would be a 20.1% chance of concluding that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is at least 2.1 points lower than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal. - If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal, and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal, then there would be a 20.1% chance that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal would be at least 2.1 points lower than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal. - There is a 20.1% chance that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is at least 2.1 points lower than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal. - There is a 20.1% chance of a Type I error. **Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study:** - If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal, and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal, then there would be a 5% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the sample mean memory scores before and after a meal for these 10 people who were part of the study differ from each other. - There is a 5% chance that the population mean memory score is the same before and after a meal. - If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal, and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal, then there would be a 5% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the population mean memory score before a meal is lower than the population mean memory score after a meal. - There is a 5% chance that
**Memory Ability Before and After a Meal**

**Research Question:**  
Is memory ability before a meal worse than after a meal? Ten participants were administered memory tests before their meal and again after their meal. A higher score indicates better memory ability.

**Data:**

| Score on the Memory Test | Before a Meal | After a Meal  |
|--------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| Person 1                 | 61            | 60            |
| Person 2                 | 72            | 62            |
| Person 3                 | 63            | 68            |
| Person 4                 | 58            | 71            |
| Person 5                 | 78            | 78            |
| Person 6                 | 77            | 71            |
| Person 7                 | 58            | 71            |
| Person 8                 | 67            | 74            |
| Person 9                 | 77            | 75            |
| Person 10                | 67            | 69            |

**Assumptions:**  
Assume a normal distribution. The significance level is \(\alpha = 0.05\).

**Statistical Analysis:**

- **a. Hypotheses:**  
  - Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)): \[ \text{Select an answer} \]
  - Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_1\)): \[ \text{Select an answer} \]

- **b. Test Statistic:**  
  \(\text{Test statistic } = \_\_\_ \) (use 3 decimal places)

- **c. P-value:**  
  \(\text{P-value } = \_ \_ \_ \_ \) (use 4 decimal places)

- **d. Comparison:**
  - \(\text{P-value } \text{ is } \ \text{__} \ \alpha\)

- **e. Decision:**  
  Based on this, we should \[ \text{Select an answer} \] the null hypothesis.

- **f. Conclusion:**  
  - \(\circ\) The results are statistically insignificant at \(\alpha = 0.05\), so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is lower than the population mean memory score after a meal.
  - \(\circ\) The results are statistically significant at
Transcribed Image Text:**Memory Ability Before and After a Meal** **Research Question:** Is memory ability before a meal worse than after a meal? Ten participants were administered memory tests before their meal and again after their meal. A higher score indicates better memory ability. **Data:** | Score on the Memory Test | Before a Meal | After a Meal | |--------------------------|---------------|---------------| | Person 1 | 61 | 60 | | Person 2 | 72 | 62 | | Person 3 | 63 | 68 | | Person 4 | 58 | 71 | | Person 5 | 78 | 78 | | Person 6 | 77 | 71 | | Person 7 | 58 | 71 | | Person 8 | 67 | 74 | | Person 9 | 77 | 75 | | Person 10 | 67 | 69 | **Assumptions:** Assume a normal distribution. The significance level is \(\alpha = 0.05\). **Statistical Analysis:** - **a. Hypotheses:** - Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)): \[ \text{Select an answer} \] - Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_1\)): \[ \text{Select an answer} \] - **b. Test Statistic:** \(\text{Test statistic } = \_\_\_ \) (use 3 decimal places) - **c. P-value:** \(\text{P-value } = \_ \_ \_ \_ \) (use 4 decimal places) - **d. Comparison:** - \(\text{P-value } \text{ is } \ \text{__} \ \alpha\) - **e. Decision:** Based on this, we should \[ \text{Select an answer} \] the null hypothesis. - **f. Conclusion:** - \(\circ\) The results are statistically insignificant at \(\alpha = 0.05\), so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is lower than the population mean memory score after a meal. - \(\circ\) The results are statistically significant at
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 3 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman