O The results aré štatithat the mean weight loss for the 52 participants on the exercise program is different than themean weight loss for the 48 participants on the diet.O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significantevidence to conclude that the population mean weight loss on the exercise program is equal tothe population mean weight loss on the diet.h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.O If the population mean weight loss on the exercise program is equal to the population meanweight loss on the diet and if another 52 and 48 participants on the exercise program and onthe diet are observed then there would be a 0.12000000000001% chance that the mean weightloss for the 52 participants on the exercise program would differ by at least 6 poundscompared to the mean weight loss for the 48 participants on the diet.O There is a 0.12000000000001% chance of a Type I error.O If the sample mean weight loss for the 52 participants on the exercise program is the same asthe sample mean weight loss for the 48 participants on the diet and if another 52 participantson the exercise program and 48 participants on the diet are weighed then there would be a0.12000000000001% chance of concluding that the mean weight loss for the 52 participants onthe exercise program differs by at least 6 pounds compared to the mean weight loss for the 48participants on the dietO There is a 0.12000000000001% chance that the mean weight loss for the 52 participants on theexercise program differs by at least 6 pounds compared to the mean weight loss for the 48participants on the diet.i. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.O If the population mean weight loss on the exercise program is equal to the population meanweight loss on the diet and if another 52 and 48 participants on the exercise program and onthe diet are observed then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falselyconcluding that the population mean weight loss on the exercise program is different than thepopulation mean weight loss on the dietO There is a 1% chance that there is a difference in the population mean weight loss betweenthose on the exercise program and those on the diet.O There is a 1% chance that you are such a beautiful person that you never have to worry aboutyour weight.O f the population mean weight loss on the exercise program is equal to the population meanweight loss on the diet and if another 52 and 48 participants on the exercise program and onthe diet are observed then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falselyconcluding that the sample mean weight loss for these 52 and 48 participants differ from eachother.P Type here to search Is a weight loss program based on exercise just as effective as a program based on diet? The 52 overweightpeople put on a strict one year exercise program lost an average of 27 pounds with a standard deviation of10 pounds. The 48 overweight people put on a strict one year diet lost an average of 21 pounds with astandard deviation of 8 pounds. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance?%3Da. For this study, we should use Select an answerb. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:Ho: Select an answer v Select an answer vSelect an answer v (please enter a decimal)H: Select an answer vSelect an answer vSelect an answer v (Please enter a decimal)c. The test statistic ? v =(please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)%3Dd. The p-value =(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)%3!e. The p-value is ? v af. Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis.g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence toconclude that the population mean weight loss on the exercise program is different than thepopulation mean weight loss on the diet.%3DO The results are statistically significant at = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to concludethat the population mean weight loss on the exercise program is different than the populationmean weight loss on the diet.O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to concludethat the mean weight loss for the 52 participants on the exercise program is different than themean weight loss for the 48 participants on the diet.O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significantevidence to conclude that the population mean weight loss on the exercise program is equal tothe population mean weight loss on the diet.h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.O If the population mean weight loss on the exercise program is equal to the population meanweight loss on the diet and if another 52 and 48 participants on the exercise program and onthe diet are observed then there would be a 0.12000000000001% chance that the mean weightloss for the 52 participants on the exercise program would differ by at least 6 poundscompared to the mean weight loss for the 48 participants on the diet.O There is a 0.12000000000001% chance of a Type I error.O If the sample mean weight loss for the 52 participants on the exercise program is the same asthe sample mean weight loss for the 48 participants on the diet and if another 52 participantsnn the exercise prooram and 48 narticinants.on the diet are weighed then there would be aP Type here to searchbp

The question is based on hypo. testing. Given : Avg. weight of people who put on strict one year…

Answered: Is a weight loss program based on…

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In a test of the effectiveness of garlic for lowering cholesterol, 36 subjects were treated with raw garlic. Cholesterol levels were measured before and after the treatment. The changes (before minus after) in their levels of LDL cholesterol (in mg/dL) have a mean of 0.7 and a standard deviation of 23.1. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that with garlic treatment, the mean change in LDL cholesterol is greater than 0. What do the results suggest about the effectiveness of the garlic treatment? Assume that a simple random sample has been selected. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value, and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.
Traffic Highway planners investigated the relationshipbetween traffic Density (number of automobiles per mile)and the average Speed of the traffic on a moderately largecity thoroughfare. The data were collected at the samelocation at 10 different times over a span of 3 months.They found a mean traffic Density of 68.6 cars per mile(cpm) with standard deviation of 27.07 cpm. Overall, the cars’ average Speed was 26.38 mph, with standard devia-tion of 9.68 mph. These researchers found the regression line for these data to be Speed = 50.55 - 0.352 Density.a) What is the value of the correlation coefficientbetween Speed and Density?b) What percent of the variation in average Speed isexplained by traffic Density? c) Predict the average Speed of traffic on the thorough-fare when the traffic Density is 50 cpm. d) What is the value of the residual for a traffic Densityof 56 cpm with an observed Speed of 32.5 mph?e) The data set initially included the point Density =125 cpm, Speed = 55 mph. This…
Low-fat or low-carb? Are low-fat diets or low-carb diets more effective for weight loss? A sample of 77 subjects went on a low-carbohydrate diet for six months. At the end of that time, the sample mean weight loss was 4.7 kilograms with a sample standard deviation of 7.16 kilograms. A second sample of 79 subjects went on a low-fat diet. Their sample mean weight loss was 2.6 kilograms with a standard deviation of 5.90 kilograms. Can you conclude that the mean weight loss differs between the two diets? Let 4, denote the mean weight lost on the low-carb diet and u, denote the mean weight lost on the low-fat diet. Use the a = 0.01 level and the TI-84 Plus calculator. Compute the -value. Round the answer to four decimal places. Determine whether to reject H0 State a conclusion
In a test of the effectiveness of garlic for lowering cholesterol, 81 subjects were treated with raw garlic. Cholesterol levels were measured before and after the treatment. The changes (before minus after) in their levels of LDL cholesterol (in mg/dL) have a mean of 0.9 and a standard deviation of 16.7. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that with garlic treatment, the mean change in LDL cholesterol is greater than 0. What do the results suggest about the effectiveness of the garlic treatment? Assume that a simple random sample has been selected. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value, and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. What are the null and alternative hypotheses?
In a test of the effectiveness of garlic for lowering cholesterol, 36 subjects were treated with raw garlic. Cholesterol levels were measured before and after the treatment. The changes (before minus after) in their levels of LDL cholesterol (in mg/dL) have a mean of 0.7 and a standard deviation of 2.33. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that with garlic treatment, the mean change in LDL cholesterol is greater than 0. What do the results suggest about the effectiveness of the garlic treatment? Assume that a simple random sample has been selected. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value, and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.
In a test of the effectiveness of garlic for lowering cholesterol, 49 subjects were treated with raw garlic. Cholesterol levels were measured before and after the treatment. The changes (before minus after) in their levels of LDL cholesterol (in mg/dL) have a mean of 0.9 and a standard deviation of 2.33 . Use a 0.10 significance level to test the claim that with garlic treatment, the mean change in LDL cholesterol is greater than 0 . What do the results suggest about the effectiveness of the garlic treatment? Assume that a simple random sample has been selected. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value, and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. What are the null and alternative hypotheses? A. Upper H 0 : mu greater than0 mg/dL Upper H 1 : mu less than0 mg/dL B. Upper H 0 : mu equals0 mg/dL Upper H 1 : mu less than0 mg/dL C. Upper H 0 : mu…
In a test of the effectiveness of garlic for lowering cholesterol, 81 subjects were treated with raw garlic. Cholesterol levels were measured before and after the treatment. The changes (before minus after) in their levels of LDL cholesterol (in mg/dL) have a mean of 0.9 and a standard deviation of 20.8. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that with garlic treatment, the mean change in LDL cholesterol is greater than 0. What do the results suggest about the effectiveness of the garlic treatment? Assume that a simple random sample has been selected. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value, and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. What are the null and alternative hypotheses? O B. H,: H=0 mg/dL Ο Α. Η μ=0 mgldL H1: µ0 mg/dL O D. H,: µ> 0 mg/dL H: µ<0 mg/dL Determine the test statistic. (Round to two decimal places as needed.)
In a test of the effectiveness of garlic for lowering cholesterol, 64 subjects were treated with raw garlic. Cholesterol levels were measured before and after the treatment. The changes (before minus after) in their levels of LDL cholesterol (in mg/dL) have a mean of 0.2 and a standard deviation of 1.81. Use a 0.10 significance level to test the claim that with garlic treatment, the mean change in LDL cholesterol is greater than 0. What do the results suggest about the effectiveness of the garlic treatment? Assume that a simple random sample has been selected. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value, and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. What are the null and alternative hypotheses? O A. Ho: H>0 mg/dL O B. Ho: H=0 mg/dL H:H0 mg/dL Determine the test statistic. (Round to two decimal places as needed.)
In a test of the effectiveness of garlic for lowering cholesterol, 49 subjects were treated with raw garlic. Cholesterol levels were measured before and after the treatment. The changes (before minus after) in their levels of LDL cholesterol (in mg/dL) have a mean of 0.8 and a standard deviation of 2.04. Use a 0.10 significance level to test the claim that with garlic treatment, the mean change in LDL cholesterol is greater than 0. What do the results suggest about the effectiveness of the garlic treatment? Assume that a simple random sample has been selected. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value, and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.
In a test of the effectiveness of garlic for lowering cholesterol, 49 subjects were treated with raw garlic. Cholesterol levels were measured before and after the treatment. The changes (before minus after) in their levels of LDL cholesterol (in mg/dL) have a mean of 0.6 and a standard deviation of 20.7. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that with garlic treatment, the mean change in LDL cholesterol is greater than 0. What do the results suggest about the effectiveness of the garlic treatment? Assume that a simple random sample has been selected. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value, and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. What are the null and alternative hypotheses? A. Ho: μ = 0 mg/dL H₁: μ> 0 mg/dL C. Ho: μ = 0 mg/dL H₁: μ#0 mg/dL Determine the test statistic. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Determine the P-value. (Round to three decimal places as needed.) State the final conclusion that addresses the…
In a test of the effectiveness of garlic for lowering cholesterol, 81 subjects were treated with raw garlic. Cholesterol levels were measured before and after the treatment. The changes (before minus after) in their levels of LDL cholesterol (in mg/dL) have a mean of 0.2 and a standard deviation of 17.2. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that with garlic treatment, the mean change in LDL cholesterol is greater than 0. What do the results suggest about the effectiveness of the garlic treatment? Assume that a simple random sample has been selected. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value, and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. What are the null and alternative hypotheses? Ο Α. Hρ: μ=0 mg/dL O B. Ho: µ=0 mg/dL H;: u#0 mg/dL H,: µ>0 mg/dL O C . H: μ=0 mg/dL O D. Ho: µ>0 mg/dL H;: µ<0 mg/dL H,:µ<0 mg/dL Determine the test statistic. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Determine the P-value, (Round to three decimal…
In a test of the effectiveness of garlic for lowering cholesterol, 64 subjects were treated with raw garlic. Cholesterol levels were measured before and after the treatment. The changes (before minus after) in their levels of LDL cholesterol (in mg/dL) have a mean of 0.6 and a standard deviation of 1.92. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that with garlic treatment, the mean change in LDL cholesterol is greater than 0. What do the results suggest about the effectiveness of the garlic treatment? Assume that a simple random sample has been selected. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value, and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. What are the null and alternative hypotheses?

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

Statistics

ISBN:

9781119256830

Author:

Amos Gilat

Publisher:

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…

Statistics

ISBN:

9781305251809

Author:

Jay L. Devore

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…

Statistics

ISBN:

9781305504912

Author:

Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

Statistics

ISBN:

9781119256830

Author:

Amos Gilat

Publisher:

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…

Statistics

ISBN:

9781305251809

Author:

Jay L. Devore

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…

Statistics

ISBN:

9781305504912

Author:

Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…

Statistics

ISBN:

9780134683416

Author:

Ron Larson, Betsy Farber

Publisher:

PEARSON

The Basic Practice of Statistics

Statistics

ISBN:

9781319042578

Author:

David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner

Publisher:

W. H. Freeman

Introduction to the Practice of Statistics

Statistics

ISBN:

9781319013387

Author:

David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig

Publisher:

W. H. Freeman

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS