In the context of energy supply, describe how the existence of a negative production externality may lead to a socially inefficient outcome. Critically analyse a Pigovian solution aimed at internalising this type of externality. Answer within 500 words and use economic figures wherever applicable (there is no minimum requirement on the number of words as long as all the questions are clearly answered).

In the context of energy supply, describe how the existence of a negative production externality may lead to a socially inefficient outcome. Critically analyse a Pigovian solution aimed at internalising this type of externality. Answer within 500 words and use economic figures wherever applicable (there is no minimum requirement on the number of words as long as all the questions are clearly answered).

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

At first glance, the research reported in the Washington Post article Why We've Been Hugely Underestimating the Overfishing of the Oceans may appear to be only bad news for the world's stock of fish. However, researchers believe that their discovery of how much overfishing has been underestimated could also be good news. Determine whether each statement should be considered good news or bad news based on the information in the article. Show Transcribed Text Good news Fisheries may be able to feed more people than previously thought. Answer Bank Policy made using FAO data could be poorly made because FAO data does not match reality. Severe declines in catches since the 1990s may be due to unsustainable fishing. Declines in catches have been even greater than FAO data suggests. Sustainable food production may be more at risk than scientists thought due to the fishing industry catching far more fish than previously believed. Bad news When catches peaked, fisheries were actually much more…
Natural resources like land, water, air, energy, etc. are the main inputs of any business process. The rapid development in industries is causing more environmental issues like pollution, carbon emission, greenhouse effects, water and air contamination, land and soil contamination, loss of biodiversity etc. So, accountability towards the environment has become one of the most essential areas of social responsibility. Our traditional accounting system is limited to record and reporting financial information of the business process for internal and external stakeholders. This limitation can be removed by implementing Environmental Accounting and Reporting over the traditional accounting system but requires good knowledge, training and standard guideline. Based on the explanation above, please give your arguments supported by some theoretical framework related to EAR from different scholars/researchers. How it’s an implementation in Indonesia? Why?
The government would like to introduce a subsidy to help citizens who need their car for work and cannot afford to buy a ULEZ-compliant car. It also wants to ensure that only citizens who need to drive their car regularly use the subsidy. Instead of the two groups of citizens discussed above, we focus on one particular citizen who does not drive very often, only once a year. As a result, this citizen does not emit excessive pollution even with a car that is not ULEZ-compliant. The government would therefore prefer citizens like her not to buy a new car to avoid having to pay the subsidy unnecessarily. Once a year, the citizen derives a benefit of driving through the ULEZ area of B = 20. She can choose to either buy a new ULEZ-compliant car at a cost of C = 10, 000, denoted x = new, or stick with her old car at no cost, denoted x = old.If she sticks with her old car, she has to pay a ULEZ fee of t = 12.50 on the day that she drives. Her net benefit of driving on that day is therefore…
Discuss three (3) of the cultural dimensions presented in Phase 1 of the Globe Project.
The climate policy toolkit has, to-date, mostly focused on demand side policies (i.e. policies that affect the pollution demand curve), some of which are ‘command-andcontrol’ and others are market based (e.g. cap-and-trade schemes, carbon taxes). (a) Explain what is meant by command-and-control in terms of a demand side climate change policy. What are the pros and cons of this as a policy option? (b) Using a diagram, explain how a carbon tax could help reduce pollution.
The following problem consist of two parts. First, a short description of a certain mi- croeconomic situation with assumptions and considerations is presented. Second, two statements are made about the situation. You have to identify whether each statement is true or false and elaborate why you assess each statement the way you do. A factory is situated next to a dormitory for nurses who work night shifts. The factory produces 120 units of humanoid robots a day. The production process is rather noisy, and the nurses often complain that their sleep is disturbed. The following graph depicts the marginal private costs (MPC) and marginal social costs (MSC) of the robot factory production. The robot market is competitive and the market price is £340. Based on this information, which of the following statements are correct? Which are false? Statement 1: At Q = 120, both the factory and the nurses would benefit from the nurses paying a fee less than 120 to the factory to reduce output.…
The government would like to introduce a subsidy to help citizens who need their car for work and cannot afford to buy a ULEZ-compliant car. It also wants to ensure that only citizens who need to drive their car regularly use the subsidy. Instead of the two groups of citizens discussed above, we focus on one particular citizen who does not drive very often, only once a year. As a result, this citizen does not emit excessive pollution even with a car that is not ULEZ-compliant. The government would therefore prefer citizens like her not to buy a new car to avoid having to pay the subsidy unnecessarily. Once a year, the citizen derives a benefit of driving through the ULEZ area of B = 20. She can choose to either buy a new ULEZ-compliant car at a cost of C = 10, 000, denoted x = new, or stick with her old car at no cost, denoted x = old.If she sticks with her old car, she has to pay a ULEZ fee of τ = 12.50 on the day that she drives. Her net benefit of driving on that day is therefore…
The city council hired three college interns to measure public support for a large parks and recreation initiative in their city. The interns mailed surveys to 500 randomly selected participants in the current public recreation program. They received 150 responses. In this case, which of the following is the population of interest? A.O The participants who support the initiative B.O All members of the community C.O All participants in the city's recreation program D.O The 150 people who responded E. The 500 people who got the survey
The climate policy toolkit has, to-date, mostly focused on demand side policies (i.e. policies that affect the pollution demand curve), some of which are ‘command-and control’ and others are market based (e.g. cap-and-trade schemes, carbon taxes). (a) Using a diagram or diagrams, explain how a cap-and-trade scheme could result in pollution reduction. (b) What is the Emissions Reduction Fund and what are its pros and cons? 1(c) Of the following four policy options, which one do you favour as a demandside policy and why? i. command-and-control in terms of a demand side climatechange ii. carbon tax iii. Emissions Reduction Fund iv. cap-and-trade scheme
List two methods that can be used to address theissue of Multicollinearity
Consider two groups of citizens, each group can either choose to drive x = d or to take public transport x = p. The first group, group 1, enjoys driving and has the following 3 benefit from using their car within the ULEZ area: B1(x1 = d) = 18. The second group, group 2, does not enjoy driving and has a benefit of B2(x2 = d) = 0 from driving their car. If they don’t drive, citizens can use public transport to get around. The benefit of doing so is the same for both groups: B1(x1 = p) = B2(x2 = p) = 10. Both groups drive cars that do not meet the ULEZ requirements and therefore create excessive pollution. For simplicity, we consider that pollution, and the health problems it induces, are the main cost of driving. This cost is imposed on both groups and is equal to Ci(x1 = d, x2 = d) = 10 if both groups drive, Ci(x1 = p, x2 = d) = Ci(x1 = d, x2 = p) = 5 if only one group drives and Ci(x1 = p, x2 = p) = 0 if neither group drives, where i represents either group 1 or group 2. The…
Consider two groups of citizens, each group can either choose to drive x = d or to take public transport x = p. The first group, group 1, enjoys driving and has the following 3 benefit from using their car within the ULEZ area: B1(x1 = d) = 18. The second group, group 2, does not enjoy driving and has a benefit of B2(x2 = d) = 0 from driving their car. If they don’t drive, citizens can use public transport to get around. The benefit of doing so is the same for both groups: B1(x1 = p) = B2(x2 = p) = 10. Both groups drive cars that do not meet the ULEZ requirements and therefore create excessive pollution. For simplicity, we consider that pollution, and the health problems it induces, are the main cost of driving. This cost is imposed on both groups and is equal to Ci(x1 = d, x2 = d) = 10 if both groups drive, Ci(x1 = p, x2 = d) = Ci(x1 = d, x2 = p) = 5 if only one group drives and Ci(x1 = p, x2 = p) = 0 if neither group drives, where i represents either group 1 or group 2. The…