In period t, a parental household (indexed by 2) equipped with human capi earns a labour income of whi, where w > 0 represents a constant wage rate_ household derives utility out of own consumption , the number of childr and their level of human capital h+1 Education is provided by teachers w equipped with the economy's average level of human capital h. Human capit child evolves from one period to another according to ht+1=(e+e)" (hi)* (h²)¹, 0 <1,7 <1 where e > 0 is a constant parameter and e represents the level of educatio
In period t, a parental household (indexed by 2) equipped with human capi earns a labour income of whi, where w > 0 represents a constant wage rate_ household derives utility out of own consumption , the number of childr and their level of human capital h+1 Education is provided by teachers w equipped with the economy's average level of human capital h. Human capit child evolves from one period to another according to ht+1=(e+e)" (hi)* (h²)¹, 0 <1,7 <1 where e > 0 is a constant parameter and e represents the level of educatio
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
Related questions
Question
Please explain to me what every different variable means in this question
![1) In period t, a parental household (indexed by i) equipped with human capital h
earns a labour income of whi, where w > 0 represents a constant wage rate. This
household derives utility out of own consumption , the number of children n
and their level of human capital h+1 Education is provided by teachers who are
equipped with the economy's average level of human capital hf. Human capital per
child evolves from one period to another according to
h₁+1 = (e+ē)" (hi)*(h?) ¹—7,
0<n, T <1
(1)
where ē> 0 is a constant parameter and e represents the level of education per
child.
The households' utility function is specified as
U₂ = In(c) + [In(ni) + 3 ln(hi+1)]
with 7,3 > 0.
Raising one child to adulthood requires a share of 0 << 1 units of time. Moreover,
education is subsidised at a rate 0 ≤ se < 1, such that education costs per child
amount to whe(1 - se).
a. Solve household i's optimisation problem and explain the economic rationale of
your results.
b. Let's define a variable a capturing the households' relative human capital en-
dowment with respect to the economy's average, such that
hi
Show that relative human capital of household i, evolves according to
ĐỀ+= = 8)² )" . (²) ²
zat (1-se)ē)
2- - (1 - se)ē
(3)
(4)
c. Suppose the +1-locus (4) intercepts from above at z = 1 with the 45-degree
line. What does this information imply for the evolution of inequality? Explain
the impact of the education subsidy on the +1-locus with an appropriate
diagram.
Remark: No derivations are required here. Just provide a decent rationale
and do as asked!](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2F1fd16735-8754-414f-abc5-79108431741b%2Ff01dc304-6c2b-4925-8c9e-be94112abc1a%2Fx3i4q2e_processed.png&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:1) In period t, a parental household (indexed by i) equipped with human capital h
earns a labour income of whi, where w > 0 represents a constant wage rate. This
household derives utility out of own consumption , the number of children n
and their level of human capital h+1 Education is provided by teachers who are
equipped with the economy's average level of human capital hf. Human capital per
child evolves from one period to another according to
h₁+1 = (e+ē)" (hi)*(h?) ¹—7,
0<n, T <1
(1)
where ē> 0 is a constant parameter and e represents the level of education per
child.
The households' utility function is specified as
U₂ = In(c) + [In(ni) + 3 ln(hi+1)]
with 7,3 > 0.
Raising one child to adulthood requires a share of 0 << 1 units of time. Moreover,
education is subsidised at a rate 0 ≤ se < 1, such that education costs per child
amount to whe(1 - se).
a. Solve household i's optimisation problem and explain the economic rationale of
your results.
b. Let's define a variable a capturing the households' relative human capital en-
dowment with respect to the economy's average, such that
hi
Show that relative human capital of household i, evolves according to
ĐỀ+= = 8)² )" . (²) ²
zat (1-se)ē)
2- - (1 - se)ē
(3)
(4)
c. Suppose the +1-locus (4) intercepts from above at z = 1 with the 45-degree
line. What does this information imply for the evolution of inequality? Explain
the impact of the education subsidy on the +1-locus with an appropriate
diagram.
Remark: No derivations are required here. Just provide a decent rationale
and do as asked!
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps with 9 images

Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you


Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON


Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON

Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education