so possesses a technology that allows him to costlessly convert any quantity of grapes into e same number of units of wine. This technology is not reversible: there is no quantity wine that he can convert to grapes. Thus, for example, if he purchases 4 units of grapes d 3 units of wine, he could consume any bundle (4-8,3+s) with s € [0, 4]. Armando's ility from consuming a units of grapes and y units of wine is u(x, y) = x²y. For each of the lowing questions, you may use, without proof, any results from the lectures for this course.

Microeconomic Theory
12th Edition
ISBN:9781337517942
Author:NICHOLSON
Publisher:NICHOLSON
Chapter4: Utility Maximization And Choice
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 4.12P
icon
Related questions
Question

please  only do: if you can teach explain steps of how to solve each part b

Armando consumes two goods: grapes and wine. He can purchase both at the market and
also possesses a technology that allows him to costlessly convert any quantity of grapes into
the same number of units of wine. This technology is not reversible: there is no quantity
of wine that he can convert to grapes. Thus, for example, if he purchases 4 units of grapes
and 3 units of wine, he could consume any bundle (4-8,3+s) with s = [0,4]. Armando's
utility from consuming a units of grapes and y units of wine is u(x, y) = x²y. For each of the
following questions, you may use, without proof, any results from the lectures for this course.
(a) Find Armando's Marshallian demand expressed in terms of the bundle he consumes (i.e.,
after any conversion of grapes into wine).
Solution: Let på denote the price of grapes and p2 the price of wine. If P₁ <p2, he can
produce wine at lower cost than he can buy it, so will only buy grapes. In this case, it
is as if both goods are priced at p₁, which gives demand (2w/3p1, w/3p1). If p₁ ≥ p2, he
has no need to convert grapes to wine and will demand (2w/3p1, w/3p2). Therefore, his
demand is
x(p, w) =
(2w/3p1, w/3p1) if P₁ < P2,
(2w/3p1, w/3p2) if p₁ ≥ p2.
(b) Suppose a researcher who is not aware of Armando's technology for converting goods
observes, for each price vector, the bundle that Armando consumes (but not the bundle
he purchases). If this researcher assumes that Armando always spends all of his wealth,
will she think that his choices satisfy the Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference?
Solution: Yes. Armando's choices look the same as those of someone who has utility
x²y for bundles with x ≤ 2y and receives no benefit from additional units of x beyond 2y
(that is, utility 4y³ for bundles with x > 2y).
Transcribed Image Text:Armando consumes two goods: grapes and wine. He can purchase both at the market and also possesses a technology that allows him to costlessly convert any quantity of grapes into the same number of units of wine. This technology is not reversible: there is no quantity of wine that he can convert to grapes. Thus, for example, if he purchases 4 units of grapes and 3 units of wine, he could consume any bundle (4-8,3+s) with s = [0,4]. Armando's utility from consuming a units of grapes and y units of wine is u(x, y) = x²y. For each of the following questions, you may use, without proof, any results from the lectures for this course. (a) Find Armando's Marshallian demand expressed in terms of the bundle he consumes (i.e., after any conversion of grapes into wine). Solution: Let på denote the price of grapes and p2 the price of wine. If P₁ <p2, he can produce wine at lower cost than he can buy it, so will only buy grapes. In this case, it is as if both goods are priced at p₁, which gives demand (2w/3p1, w/3p1). If p₁ ≥ p2, he has no need to convert grapes to wine and will demand (2w/3p1, w/3p2). Therefore, his demand is x(p, w) = (2w/3p1, w/3p1) if P₁ < P2, (2w/3p1, w/3p2) if p₁ ≥ p2. (b) Suppose a researcher who is not aware of Armando's technology for converting goods observes, for each price vector, the bundle that Armando consumes (but not the bundle he purchases). If this researcher assumes that Armando always spends all of his wealth, will she think that his choices satisfy the Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference? Solution: Yes. Armando's choices look the same as those of someone who has utility x²y for bundles with x ≤ 2y and receives no benefit from additional units of x beyond 2y (that is, utility 4y³ for bundles with x > 2y).
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Utility Function
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Microeconomic Theory
Microeconomic Theory
Economics
ISBN:
9781337517942
Author:
NICHOLSON
Publisher:
Cengage
Exploring Economics
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:
9781544336329
Author:
Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:
SAGE Publications, Inc
Micro Economics For Today
Micro Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:
9781337613064
Author:
Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou…
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou…
Economics
ISBN:
9781285165875
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning