When filing an income tax return, one can claim a deduction for charitable contributions. Let's simplify the incometax system and assume that the tax is proportional to the level of taxable income (income after deductions).(a) Suppose we increase the marginal income tax rate. An economic adviser claims that the effect of this tax change onthe amount of charitable contributions is uncertain. Plot a simple graph that illustrates this situation (it involvesthe choice between charitable contributions and other spending), use it to explain why the effect is uncertain andexplain what it depends on.(b) Now suppose that we instead increase the marginal tax rate but also provide a transfer that makes the bundlethat used to be optimal before tax increased just affordable. According to the economic adviser this policy changewill make people contribute more to charity. Why?

Income Tax is defined as a tax that the government imposes on the income that is generated by the…

When filing an income tax return, one can claim a deduction for charitable contributions. Let's simplify the income tax system and assume that the tax is proportional to the level of taxable income (income after deductions).

When filing an income tax return, one can claim a deduction for charitable contributions. Let's simplify the income tax system and assume that the tax is proportional to the level of taxable income (income after deductions).

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter4: Utility Maximization And Choice

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4.2P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

2
T Suppose your classmate Gilberto offers you a wager: He will choose a playing card at random from a deck and pay you $1,000 if it is red, but you have to pay him $1,000 if it is black. Assume your wealth is currently $3,000. The graph shown below plots your utility as a function of wealth. Use the graph to answer the questions that follow. 100 ips ips 88888 UTILITY (Units of utility) + + 2 3 WEALTH (Thousands of dollars) + (? The shape of your utility function implies that you are a the difference in utility between C and A is individual, and, therefore, you rence between A and B. risk-friendly accept the wager because Which of the following sentences most appropriately des risk-averse pain of losing $1,000 is greater than the joy of winning $1,000 for individuals who are risk averse? Check all that apply. The more wealth that risk-averse people have, the more satisfaction they receive from an additional dollar. The more wealth that risk-averse people have, the less satisfaction they…
UTIITY (Units of utility) 10 Suppose your friend Deborah offers you the following bet: She will flip a coin and pay you $2,000 if it lands heads up and collect $2,000 from you if it lands tails up. Currently, your level of wealth is $6,000. The graph shows your utility function from wealth. Use the graph to answer the following questions. 100 90 80 B 70 A 60 50 40 30 20 10 WEALTH (Thousands of dollars)
Suppose that Timmy lives in a neighborhood where graffiti is common. People's cars and the sides of houses are often vandalized with graffiti In response to the vandalism, the people in the neighborhood have proposed a voluntary community fund to pay for extra police patrols. There are 1000 people in Timmy's neighborhood, and each is recommended to contribute $10 a month Timmy's car has recently been vandalized and he is concerned it may happen again. Although he believes that he will benefit from the extra police patrols, Timmy has decided to take a free-rider approach Given his thinking, how much will Timmy contribute to the fund? Timmy's contribution: $ Assume that the entire neighborhood has the same mentality as Timmy. What will occur? The rate of graffiti in the neighborhood will increase significantly Everyone will contribute money towards the community fund, yielding higher rates of police patrol and less graffiti No one will contribute to the community fund, resulting in no…
Hi, I need some help with the attached question. It is taken from an optimisation problem set in my intermediate maths for economists course.
On July 1, 1965, the federal ad valorem taxes on many goods and services were eliminated. Comparing prices before and after this change, we can determine how much the price fell in response to the tax's elimination. Given an ad valorem tax of v, the tax collected on a good that sold for p was vp. If the price fell by vp when the tax was eliminated, consumers must have been bearing the full incidence of the tax. Consequently, consumers got the full benefit of removing the tax from those goods. The entire amount of the tax cut was passed on to consumers for all commodities and services that were studied for which the taxes were collected at the retail level (except admissions and club dues) and for most commodities for which excise taxes were imposed at the manufacturer level, including face powder, sterling silverware, wristwatches, and handbags (Brownlee and Perry, 1967). List the conditions (in terms of the elasticities or shapes of supply or demand curves) that are consistent with…
can explain this question? tq A consumer decides not to buy a VCR when her income is $20,000. However, when her income rises to $30,000, she decides to buy one. In a single diagram, draw the budget lines and indifference curves to illustrate this situation (assume the VCR costs $300 in both time periods). Be sure to label your diagram completely.
GLASS-1: Short Individual Assessment 10 A B E D U. 1 2 4 cheeseburgers 1. Refer to the figure as you answer the following questions: Bundle E has one less cheeseburger than Bundle D. What assumption(s) would still allow you to say that Bundle E is preferred to Bundle D? Briefly explain. d. Consider the utility function of individual A given by UA (X,Y) = Xº.5y0.5 in answering the items below: 2. Calculate the marginal utility for each good (MU,x & MUy) of individual A and the marginal rate of substitution (MRSxY). Interpret your computed values If Px = 0.5, Py = 1, and I = 10, solve for X*, Y*, and U* using the Lagrange a. b. Multiplier Method. pearl shakes
Solve all this question......you will not solve all questions then I will give you down?? upvote.... Need some help, will leave like. Thank you!
Units of the Good 0 1 5678AWN2 3 4 Total Utility Total Utility of X of Y 0 0 620 1740 1120 3030 1500 3960 1820 4710 2080 5280 2300 5730 2460 6060 2580 6300 For the next 3 questions, assume that an individual consumes two goods X and Y. The total utility (assumed measurable) of each good is independent of the rate of consumption of other goods. The prices of X and Y are, respectively, $20 and $30. If the consumer buys the fourth unit of X the Marginal Utility per Dollar Spent on X is 16 I If the consumer has $210 to spend on X and Y, the utility-maximizing bundle is The minimum budget necessary to move to a higher equilibrium consumption of X and Y is $ unit(s) of X and unit(s) of Y.
Jien is just bored all the time; no amount of success makes him happy, it seems. Below is a list of his income for the last several years and the utility he experienced per dollar of income: Year Yearly Income Utility per Dollar Earned 2017 $60,000 2 utils 2018 $70,000 1.8 2019 $100,000 1.5 2020 $120,000 1 2021 $145,000 0.40 From the above, we can say that Jien most likely is different from most people economists study in terms of risk attitudes is "risk loving" will not take a fair bet has a utility of wealth curve that is a straight line
A common marketing tactic among many liquor stores is to offer their clientele quantity (or volume) discounts. For instance, the second-leading brand of wine exported from Chile sells in the United States for $15 per bottle if the consumer purchases up to eight bottles. The price of each additional bottle beyond this is only $8. (a) If a consumer has $200 to divide between purchasing this brand of wine and other goods, graph the consumer’s budge set when liquor stores use this marketing tactic and the price of other goods is $1.00. (b) Assuming a consumer has standard indifference curves, will a consumer ever purchase exactly eight bottles of this wine?