In lab, you will be participating in a study we have performed in previous semesters, analyzing beer. Samples of beer were measured for residual iron contamination. A calibration curve was made up using solutions of Fe(NO3)2 that were carefully made to accurate yield Fe concentrations given in the attached excel spreadsheet. Note that concentratiens are given in units of micrograms/Liter (* parts-per-billion by mass). Using the given calibration curve data, determine the concentration of Fe in each of indicated beers. Since there are three replicates of each calibration point and of each sample, you should use the average value of the three measurements for each sample. You do not need to be concerned about error analysis or experimental uncertainty in this particular problem.
In lab, you will be participating in a study we have performed in previous semesters, analyzing beer. Samples of beer were measured for residual iron contamination. A calibration curve was made up using solutions of Fe(NO3)2 that were carefully made to accurate yield Fe concentrations given in the attached excel spreadsheet. Note that concentratiens are given in units of micrograms/Liter (* parts-per-billion by mass). Using the given calibration curve data, determine the concentration of Fe in each of indicated beers. Since there are three replicates of each calibration point and of each sample, you should use the average value of the three measurements for each sample. You do not need to be concerned about error analysis or experimental uncertainty in this particular problem.
Chemistry
10th Edition
ISBN:9781305957404
Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Publisher:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Chapter1: Chemical Foundations
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ: Define and explain the differences between the following terms. a. law and theory b. theory and...
Related questions
Question
Am i doing right on this?? Or wrong?
(Determining conc of unknown using calibration curve)
![9 Merge & Center v
$ v % 9
Conditional Form
Formatting as Ta
16
fx
C
F
H
J
K
M
Sample Name Iron
Replicate 1 Replicate 2
Replicate 3 average
absorbance
cocentration
(micrograms
Aiter)
1
2 Blank
3 10 ug/L Fe
4 100 ug/L Fe
5 500 ug/L Fe
6 1000 ug/L Fe
7 Bud Light
8 Juicy Haze
9 Landshark Sh to be determined
10 Leinenkugel to be determined
0.0
158.8591
307.6801
156.8378
309.6222
895.1578
159.3128
308.7295
158.3365667
10.0
308.6772667
894.8291667
0.289923422
.0
893.4536
100
500.0
1000.0
to be determined
to be determined
895.8761
0.752158908
2984,987
5962.917
2931.439
2971.704
2962.71
1.27210792
5925,558
6029.956
1.5765975
1.283142283
5972.810333
3054.931
3038.327
3023,591
3038.949667
112.7512
113.222
113.1685
113.0472333
-0.146321285
226.8524
226.6448
212.4527
226.6448
226.714
0.155897116
213.4358
212.1578
212.6821
0.128149716
11
12
13
14
15
Chart Title
16
2
17
18
y= 0.0014x + 0.3275
R =0,8415
18
19
1.6
20
1.4
21
12
22
1
23
24
0.8
25
0.6
26
0.4
0.4
27
02
28
29
30
0.0
200.0
400.0
600.0
800.0
1000.0
1200.0
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2Fe7ec106d-cdb6-462d-82f1-cffdbc407fec%2F9cd9354b-0ad8-4cbd-bcc2-f134f7577ee6%2Fexwbgt_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:9 Merge & Center v
$ v % 9
Conditional Form
Formatting as Ta
16
fx
C
F
H
J
K
M
Sample Name Iron
Replicate 1 Replicate 2
Replicate 3 average
absorbance
cocentration
(micrograms
Aiter)
1
2 Blank
3 10 ug/L Fe
4 100 ug/L Fe
5 500 ug/L Fe
6 1000 ug/L Fe
7 Bud Light
8 Juicy Haze
9 Landshark Sh to be determined
10 Leinenkugel to be determined
0.0
158.8591
307.6801
156.8378
309.6222
895.1578
159.3128
308.7295
158.3365667
10.0
308.6772667
894.8291667
0.289923422
.0
893.4536
100
500.0
1000.0
to be determined
to be determined
895.8761
0.752158908
2984,987
5962.917
2931.439
2971.704
2962.71
1.27210792
5925,558
6029.956
1.5765975
1.283142283
5972.810333
3054.931
3038.327
3023,591
3038.949667
112.7512
113.222
113.1685
113.0472333
-0.146321285
226.8524
226.6448
212.4527
226.6448
226.714
0.155897116
213.4358
212.1578
212.6821
0.128149716
11
12
13
14
15
Chart Title
16
2
17
18
y= 0.0014x + 0.3275
R =0,8415
18
19
1.6
20
1.4
21
12
22
1
23
24
0.8
25
0.6
26
0.4
0.4
27
02
28
29
30
0.0
200.0
400.0
600.0
800.0
1000.0
1200.0
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
![2. In analytical measurements based on emission spectroscopy (such as fluorescence
measurements and atomic emission spectroscopies), the signal being measured (e.g.,
intensity of light emitted) is strongly dependent on the design of the instrument used. As a
result, conversion of measured intensities to concentrations relies on the use of calibration
curves that have to be made and run each time, along with measurement of the actual
samples of interest. Calibration curves are usually run on a daily basis, and sometimes even
more frequently.
In lab, you will be participating in a study we have performed in previous semesters, analyzing
beer. Samples of beer were measured for residual iron contamination. A calibration curve was
made up using solutions of Fe(NO3)2 that were carefully made to accurate yield-Fe
concentrations given in the attached excel spreadsheet. Note that concentrations are given in
units of micrograms/Liter (* parts-per-billion by mass). Using the given catibration curve data,
determine the concentration of Fe in each of indicated beers. Since there are three replicates of
each calibration point and of each sample, you should use the average value of the three
measurements for each sample. You do not need to be concerned about error analysis or
experimental uncertainty in this particular probtem.](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2Fe7ec106d-cdb6-462d-82f1-cffdbc407fec%2F9cd9354b-0ad8-4cbd-bcc2-f134f7577ee6%2F4lzupcu_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:2. In analytical measurements based on emission spectroscopy (such as fluorescence
measurements and atomic emission spectroscopies), the signal being measured (e.g.,
intensity of light emitted) is strongly dependent on the design of the instrument used. As a
result, conversion of measured intensities to concentrations relies on the use of calibration
curves that have to be made and run each time, along with measurement of the actual
samples of interest. Calibration curves are usually run on a daily basis, and sometimes even
more frequently.
In lab, you will be participating in a study we have performed in previous semesters, analyzing
beer. Samples of beer were measured for residual iron contamination. A calibration curve was
made up using solutions of Fe(NO3)2 that were carefully made to accurate yield-Fe
concentrations given in the attached excel spreadsheet. Note that concentrations are given in
units of micrograms/Liter (* parts-per-billion by mass). Using the given catibration curve data,
determine the concentration of Fe in each of indicated beers. Since there are three replicates of
each calibration point and of each sample, you should use the average value of the three
measurements for each sample. You do not need to be concerned about error analysis or
experimental uncertainty in this particular probtem.
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
Step 1
Absorbance and concentration are related as follows:
Because of the linear relationship, the graph between absorbance and concentration is a best fit straight line.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, chemistry and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
![Chemistry](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305957404/9781305957404_smallCoverImage.gif)
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781305957404
Author:
Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Chemistry](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259911156/9781259911156_smallCoverImage.gif)
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781259911156
Author:
Raymond Chang Dr., Jason Overby Professor
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
![Principles of Instrumental Analysis](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305577213/9781305577213_smallCoverImage.gif)
Principles of Instrumental Analysis
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781305577213
Author:
Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. Crouch
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Chemistry](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305957404/9781305957404_smallCoverImage.gif)
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781305957404
Author:
Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Chemistry](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259911156/9781259911156_smallCoverImage.gif)
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781259911156
Author:
Raymond Chang Dr., Jason Overby Professor
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
![Principles of Instrumental Analysis](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305577213/9781305577213_smallCoverImage.gif)
Principles of Instrumental Analysis
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781305577213
Author:
Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. Crouch
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Organic Chemistry](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780078021558/9780078021558_smallCoverImage.gif)
Organic Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:
9780078021558
Author:
Janice Gorzynski Smith Dr.
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
![Chemistry: Principles and Reactions](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305079373/9781305079373_smallCoverImage.gif)
Chemistry: Principles and Reactions
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781305079373
Author:
William L. Masterton, Cecile N. Hurley
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes, Bind…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781118431221/9781118431221_smallCoverImage.gif)
Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes, Bind…
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781118431221
Author:
Richard M. Felder, Ronald W. Rousseau, Lisa G. Bullard
Publisher:
WILEY