In a particular very small region, the consumer price index, C, depends on the current value of gross regional domestic expenditure E, number of people living in poverty P, and the average number of houschold members in a family F, by the following formula: e Ep C = 100 + %3D If it is known that the gross regional domestic expenditure is decreasing at a rate of PHP 50 per year, and the number of people living in poverty and the average number of houschold members in a family are incrcasing at 3 and 1 per year, resp., how fast does the consumer price index change per year at the moment when E = 1,000, P = 200, and F = 5?

In a particular very small region, the consumer price index, C, depends on the current value of gross regional domestic expenditure E, number of people living in poverty P, and the average number of houschold members in a family F, by the following formula: e Ep C = 100 + %3D If it is known that the gross regional domestic expenditure is decreasing at a rate of PHP 50 per year, and the number of people living in poverty and the average number of houschold members in a family are incrcasing at 3 and 1 per year, resp., how fast does the consumer price index change per year at the moment when E = 1,000, P = 200, and F = 5?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In the table below compute the level of equilibrium national income (Y) for each of the values of P. For example, when P2, AE = 6000+ 0.6Y. Thus the equilibrium level of Y is such that Y = 6000+ 0.6Y0.6Y, which implies Y = 15000. (Round your responses to the nearest whole number.)
Cristina is excited with these averages and tells her public relations team to prepare a glossy brochure to showcase this $250 increase in household income. which of the following must be true to confidently conclude that this $250 difference in average income was caused by access to a UThere The herders who bought UThere phones would have had higher income than the herders who did not even if they had not purchased the UThere phone. The herders who bought UThere phones would have had the same income as the herders who did not even if they had not purchased the UThere phone. We don’t need to worry about Selection Bias since Nepal and Tibet are small countries with more or less similar people. The equation for Selection Bias does not provide enough information since we do not know the counterfactuals.
No written by hand solution
Wealth, earnings, and disposable income are just three of several ways of looking at inequality. Imagine a household that earns $80,000 per year from labor. In that year, it also receives an income of $3,000 from investments, pays $12,000 in tax, and receives $7,000 in transfers from the state. Which of the following is its market income and its disposable income? O $83,000; $71,000. O $83,000 $78,000. O $80,000; $68,000. O $80,000; $75,000. J
Why has the distribution of income become more unequal in the last 30 years
TRUE or FALSE 64. Public policy is essential in solving poverty at the local and national levels. 65. Solving poverty has to be done from macroeconomic and microeconomic levels. 66. The Kuznets Curve is a graphical presentation of the relationship between the Gini coefficient and GNI per capita
The type of inequality before (pre) taxes and transfers are applied is called NET income inequality, and the inequality after (post) taxes and transfers is the MARKET income inequality. Group of answer choices True False
Consider an economy with 4000 people and the following income distribution: each person in the bottom quartile of the income distribution earns $10 dollars per hour; each person in the 2nd quartiles earns $20 dollars per hour; each person in the 3rd quartiles earns $25 dollars per hour;and each person in the top quartile of the income distribution earns $45 dollars per hour. (2) Suppose the bottom quartile pays no taxes, the 2nd quartiles pay 10% its income in taxes, the 3rd pays 20% and the top quartile pays 40% of its income in taxes. 80% of all tax money is redistributed equally to all citizens in the form of military defense, government pensions (social security), roads/highways, etc. The remaining tax money is distributed entirely to the poorest quartile. What is the Gini coefficient associated with this redistribution plan?
Please no written by hand and no image in 2017 the mortgage interest deduction became even more regressive than in thepast. Regressive, in this context, means that it benefits the wealthy significantlymore than those lower on the income scale. The reason is simple: Mortgage interestis a function of the size of the mortgage. Since the wealthy tend to buy moreexpensive homes, their mortgages are larger and their tax benefits larger. Does thatmatter to your opinion of the subsidy?