The table shows the distribution of personal income in the United States in 2016. Percentage of total income Households Poorest 20 percent Second 20 percent Third 20 percent Fourth 20 percent Richest 20 percent 3.1 8.2 14.3 23.2 51.2 For all U.S. households to receive an equal share of income, what percentage of total income would the poorest 20 percent of households have to receive from higher-income groups? What percentage would the second poorest have to receive? >>> Answer to 1 decimal place. The poorest 20 percent of households would have to receiveO percent. The second poorest 20 percent of households have to receive percent.

The table shows the distribution of personal income in the United States in 2016. Percentage of total income Households Poorest 20 percent Second 20 percent Third 20 percent Fourth 20 percent Richest 20 percent 3.1 8.2 14.3 23.2 51.2 For all U.S. households to receive an equal share of income, what percentage of total income would the poorest 20 percent of households have to receive from higher-income groups? What percentage would the second poorest have to receive? >>> Answer to 1 decimal place. The poorest 20 percent of households would have to receiveO percent. The second poorest 20 percent of households have to receive percent.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The FGT0 measure does not reflect the depth of poverty below the poverty line. [6] (i) Suggest a specific income transfer within this economy that demonstrates this limitation of FGT0. Take $1 from person 2 and give it to person 4. This makes person 2 poorer in absolute terms, but does not change FGT0. (ii) Compute FGT0 after the transfer. Still 3/6. (iii)Discuss why this feature limits how useful FGT0 is as a measure of poverty. FGT0 is not able to capture changes among the poor. For example, the desperately poor could become much better off and, as long as they weren’t so much better off that they cross the poverty line, we would see no improvement in poverty as measured by FGT0.
All of the following are sources of inequality in the distribution of personal income EXCEPT a. progressive income taxes b. discrimination in employment c. differences in personal motivation d. differences in educational level attained e. differences in abilities
The graph shows a Lorenz curve for an economy with a total income of 30000; Share of Income a 40% 60% 80% 100% A B C D E 20% suppose that A=100%, b=48%, c=23%, D=9% and E=2% What is the income share of each quintile in percentage? (enter the numbers with % sign, such as 5%) Quintile 1 (poorest quintile) = type your answer... type your answer... type your answer... Percentile Quintile 2 = Quintile 3 = Quintile 4=
1. Income inequality and the poverty rate The following table summarizes the income distribution for the town of Perkopia, which has a population of 10,000 people. Every individual within an income group earns the same income, and the total annual income in the economy is $500,000,000. Suppose that in 2007, the poverty line is set at an annual income of $42,350 for an individual. Year Lowest Quintile Second Quintile 2001 2007 2013 2019 3.0 3.4 3.8 5.0 Share of Total Income in Perkopia (Percent) 8.6 9.4 9.7 11.0 The data in the table suggest that there was Middle Quintile Fourth Quintile 14.0 14.6 15.2 15.5 21.9 22.4 22.9 25.0 Highest Quintile 52.5 50.2 48.4 43.5 income inequality from 2001 to 2019. MacBook Pro Complete the following table to help you determine the poverty rate in Perkopia in 2007. To do this, begin by determining the total income of all individuals in each quintile using the fact that total annual income in the economy is $500,000,000. Next, determine the income of an…
1. relative or absolute 2. relative or absolute 3. little or substantial 4.relative or absolute 5. Supplemental or Social 6.Supplemental or Social 7. earned income or dependent care 8. Disability or Nutrition Only typed answer
economic
5
Use the data from the table below to construct a Lorenz curve. Income Shares in the United States Lowest 20% Second Lowest 20% Third 20% Fourth 20% Highest 20% 5.2 10.3 15.3 22.4 46.9
Consider an economy with 4000 people and the following income distribution: each person in the bottom quartile of the income distribution earns $10 dollars per hour; each person in the 2nd quartiles earns $20 dollars per hour; each person in the 3rd quartiles earns $25 dollars per hour;and each person in the top quartile of the income distribution earns $45 dollars per hour. (2) Suppose the bottom quartile pays no taxes, the 2nd quartiles pay 10% its income in taxes, the 3rd pays 20% and the top quartile pays 40% of its income in taxes. 80% of all tax money is redistributed equally to all citizens in the form of military defense, government pensions (social security), roads/highways, etc. The remaining tax money is distributed entirely to the poorest quartile. What is the Gini coefficient associated with this redistribution plan?
Q2] Given is the data for Country A and B: Population Fraction Country A's Income Country B's Income bottom 25% 5 million 10 million 2nd 25% 10 million 15 million 3rd 25% 30 million 20 million top 25% 55 million 55 million a) Compute the cumulative income share and neatly plot (using Excel) the Lorenz curve for these two countries with labels. Feel free to use excel template that I have uploaded and copy paste the plot. b) Compute the Gini coefficient assuming the region beneath the two respective Lorenz curve is For country A = 0.2875 For country B = 0.3250
2. Constructing a Lorenz curve from income shares data The following table shows the approximate income distribution for Peru, Bulgaria, and Lithuania in 2016. In particular, it shows the income shares of each fifth of the income distribution. Percentage Share, 2016 Percentage of Families Peru Bulgaria Lithuania Lowest fifth 4 9 7 Second-lowest fifth 8 14 12 Middle fifth 12 17 16 Second-highest fifth Highest fifth 20 22 22 56 38 43 has the most total income. On the following graph, plot the Lorenz curves for the three countries. Plot Peru's Lorenz curve using the green points (triangle symbol), Bulgaria's Lorenz curve using the blue points (circle symbol), and Lithuania's Lorenz curve using the purple points (diamond symbol). Be sure to plot the first point of each Lorenz curve at (0,0). Note: Plot your points in the order in which you would like them connected. Line segments will connect the points automatically. CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE OF MONEY INCOME graph.) 100 20 40 60 80 100…