In a Completely Randomized Experimental Design, 3 brands of paper towels were tested for their ability to absorb water. Equal-sized towels were used, with three sections of towels tested per brand. Excel was used to perform the ANOVA analysis of the data using alpha = 0.05. The Excel-generated output is given below: SUMMARY Groups Count Sum Average Variance Brand X 3 280 93.33333333 34.33333333 Brand Y 3 289 96.33333333 6.333333333 Brand Z 3 248 82.66666667 42.33333333 ANOVA Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit Between Groups 309.5555556 2 154.7777778 5.59437751 0.042532458 5.14325285 Within Groups 166 6 27.66666667 Total 475.5555556 8 The null hypothesis states that there is no significant difference between the population mean absorbency ratings for these three different brands of paper towel. After looking at the Excel-generated ANOVA output above, do you believe the null? EXPLAIN YOUR ANSWER, and identify the specific part of the Excel-generated ANOVA output that supports your decision. BE SPECIFIC!!
In a Completely Randomized Experimental Design, 3 brands of paper towels were tested for their ability to absorb water. Equal-sized towels were used, with three sections of towels tested per brand. Excel was used to perform the ANOVA analysis of the data using alpha = 0.05. The Excel-generated output is given below:
SUMMARY | ||||||
Groups | Count | Sum | Average | Variance | ||
Brand X | 3 | 280 | 93.33333333 | 34.33333333 | ||
Brand Y | 3 | 289 | 96.33333333 | 6.333333333 | ||
Brand Z | 3 | 248 | 82.66666667 | 42.33333333 | ||
ANOVA | ||||||
Source of Variation | SS | df | MS | F | P-value | F crit |
Between Groups | 309.5555556 | 2 | 154.7777778 | 5.59437751 | 0.042532458 | 5.14325285 |
Within Groups | 166 | 6 | 27.66666667 | |||
Total | 475.5555556 | 8 |
The null hypothesis states that there is no significant difference between the population
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps