Imagine that you are at dinner with an acquaintance and that you are each independently choosing what to order for dinner: a burger (which costs $8), or a chicken ($12). In terms of enjoyment, you each have the same preferences: you value the burger at $14, chicken at $17. In other words, if you were dining alone and ordered a burger, your payoff would equal $14- $8 = $6. In this case, however, you will split the bill equally with your companion and thus your payoff depends both on your own order and the order of your acquaintance. Specifically, each diner's payoff is equal to the value of their own meal minus half the cost of the total bill. They also get a payoff of $2 when both of them choose the same meal. (a) Write down the normal form representation of the game in which both players are independently choosing between the actions Burger, Chicken. (b) What are pure and mixed Nash equilibria? Draw best response graphs according to beliefs.

Imagine that you are at dinner with an acquaintance and that you are each independently choosing what to order for dinner: a burger (which costs $8), or a chicken ($12). In terms of enjoyment, you each have the same preferences: you value the burger at $14, chicken at $17. In other words, if you were dining alone and ordered a burger, your payoff would equal $14- $8 = $6. In this case, however, you will split the bill equally with your companion and thus your payoff depends both on your own order and the order of your acquaintance. Specifically, each diner's payoff is equal to the value of their own meal minus half the cost of the total bill. They also get a payoff of $2 when both of them choose the same meal. (a) Write down the normal form representation of the game in which both players are independently choosing between the actions Burger, Chicken. (b) What are pure and mixed Nash equilibria? Draw best response graphs according to beliefs.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

PLEASE CHECK THIS HOW TO SOLVE
Suppose Edison and Hilary are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that Edison chooses Right and Hilary chooses Right, Edison will receive a payoff of 3 and Hilary will receive a payoff of 7. Hilary Left Right Left 4, 6 6, 8 Edison Right 7, 5 3, 7 The only dominant strategy in this game is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Edison chooses and Hilary chooses
Consider a game in which, simultaneously, player 1 selects a number x € [2, 8] and player 2 selects a number y E [2, 8]. The payoffs are given by: и, (х, у) — 2ху — х? из(х, у) — 4ху — у?. Calculate the rationalizable strategy profiles for this game.
i need the answer quickly
Arif and Aisha agree to meet for a date at a local dance club next week. In their enthusiasm, they forget to agree which venue will be the site of their meeting. Luckily the town has only two dancing venues, Palms and Oasis. Having discussed their tastes in dancing venues last week, both know that Arif prefers Palms to the Oasis and Aisha prefers the Oasis to Palms. In fact, their payoffs reflect that if both go to Oasis, Aisha’s utility is 3 and Arif’s 2, while if both go to Palms Arif’s utility is 3 and Aisha’s is 2. If they do not go to the same venue, then they both have a utility of 0. (a) Write the payoff matrix and explain whether there are any pure Nash equilibria. Carefully explain what these are and why. Comment on the existence of any dominant strategy equilibria. (b) Please calculate mixed strategy equilibria, if any, and then derive the probability that Arif and Aisha will find themselves at the same venue. Carefully explain the steps to your solution; a numerical…
Find the SPNE for the centipede game. Centipede game: Two players, 1 and 2, take turns choosing one of two actions each time, continue or stop. They both start with $1 in their respective piles, and each time i says continue, $1 is taken away from his pile, and $2 are added to the other player's pile. The game automatically stops when both players have $100 in their respective piles.
Please see the attache question
Suppose Antonio and Trinity are playing a game that requires both to simultaneously choose an action: Up or Down. The payoff matrix that follows shows the earnings of each person as a function of both of their choices. For example, the upper-right cell shows that if Antonio chooses Up and Trinity chooses Down, Antonio will receive a payoff of 7 and Trinity will receive a payoff of 5. Trinity Up Down Up 4,8 7,5 Antonio Down 3,2 5,6 In this game, the only dominant strategy is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Antonio chooses, and Trinity chooses Grade It Now Save & Continue Continue without saving @ 2 F2 #3 80 Q F3 MacBook Air 44 F7 Dll F8 44 F10 74 $ 4 05 Λ & % 5 6 7 8 * 0 Q W E R T Y U 1 A N S X 9 0 -O O D F G H J K L on را H command C > B N M Λ - - P [ H Λ command opti
In 'the dictator' game, one player (the dictator) chooses how to divide a pot of $10 between herself and another player (the recipient). The recipient does not have an opportunity to reject the proposed distribution. As such, if the dictator only cares about how much money she makes, she should keep all $10 for herself and give the recipient nothing. However, when economists conduct experiments with the dictator game, they find that dictators often offer strictly positive amounts to the recipients. Are dictators behaving irrationally in these experiments? Whether you think they are or not, your response should try to provide an explanation for the behavior.
Maipo and Pisco need to decide how to divide a cake between the two of them. Both like cake and want to get as much cake as they can. They decide to let Maipo cut the cake first and then Pisco gets to pick which piece he wants. For simplicity, assume that Maipo can only cut the cake in two ways: He can either divide it into two pieces that are equal size (i.e., both will get half the cake) or he can divide the cake into two pieces where one piece is twice the size of the other (i.e., one will get a piece that is two-thirds of the cake and the other will get a piece that is one-third of the cake). a. Set up this game as a sequential game and draw the game tree that represents it Note: You can either draw the game tree by hand and then photograph/scan the tree and paste it into the assignment or use the drawing tool in Word to draw the tree. b. Find the sub-game perfect Nash Equilibria to this game. Underline the strategies or highlight the game tree path to show what the Nash Equilibria…
The US and Canada have overfished North Atlantic cod stocks nearly to the point of extinction. Both countries wish to preserve the cod industry (and hence the cod stocks), so the two countries sign an agreement to limit fish hauls. Each country has two possible strategies: comply with the agreement (limit fishing) or renege on the agreement (overfish). Each country’s payoffs for different strategy combinations are given in the matrix below. The numbers in the cells represent utilities, and the payoff ordering is (US, Canada). QUESTIONS: 1.If this is a one-shot game (i.e., it is played once), do the players have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? Briefly explain your answer. 2.What is the equilibrium of this game? Is it Pareto-optimal? How do you know?
Suppose that Jason and Chad each are thinking of opening up a diet coke stand on the fourth floor of this building. Suppose that potential customers are evenly spaced on a distance that is normalized to 1. Customers will buy a diet coke from whichever stand requires the least walking. If they are the same distance the customer will flip a coin. This is depicted below. 1/4 1/2 3/4 Suppose that Jason and Chad are simultaneously choosing the location of their stands, what is the Nash Equilibrium location? a. One of them puts a stand at 3/4 and the other puts a stand at 1/4 b. Chad and Jason put their stands right next to each other at 1/2 c. One of them puts a stand at 0 and the other puts a stand at 1 d. There is no Nash Equilibrium