How would you BEST describe theresults?There is a main effect of outcome: People who received the house were moresatisfied than those who did not receive the house.There is an interaction between outcome and ambivalence: Those with highambivalence were satisfied with the outcome, but only if they received thehouse. If they did not receive the house, those with high ambivalence actuallyfelt worse.There is a main effect of ambivalence: People with high ambivalence were lesssatisfied than those with low ambivalence.There is an interaction between outcome and ambivalence: Those with lowambivalence were satisfied with the outcome, but only if they received thehouse. If they did not receive the house, those with low ambivalence actuallyfelt worse.There is an interaction of outcome and satisfaction: Those who were rejectedwere more ambivalent about the house, but only if they were satisfied with theoutcome. If they were dissatisfied, those who were rejected were actually lessambivalent. Previous research suggests that ambivalence (having both positive and negativereactions to the same object) leads to discomfort. However, it's possible thatambivalence can sometimes be functional in that it can serve as a buffer when weare uncertain as to whether we will achieve a desired object or event---just in casewe don't get what we want.Participants were asked to visualize buying their first home. Some participantswere told only good things about the house whereas other participants received amixture of good and bad information (to increase ambivalence). They were thenasked to "bid" on the house. For half of the participants, their bid was accepted andfor the other half, their bid was rejected. Everyone's satisfaction with the outcomewas measured.Overall, those whose bids were "accepted" were more satisfied with the outcomethan those whose bids were "rejected." However, when the bid was rejected, thosewith high ambivalence felt better than those with low ambivalence. When the bidwas accepted, those with low ambivalence felt better than those with highambivalence.

How would you BEST describe the results? There is a main effect of outcome: People who received the house were more satisfied than those who did not receive the house. There is an interaction between outcome and ambivalence: Those with high ambivalence were satisfied with the outcome, but only if they received the house. If they did not receive the house, those with high ambivalence actually felt worse. There is a main effect of ambivalence: People with high ambivalence were less satisfied than those with low ambivalence. © There is an interaction between outcome and ambivalence: Those with low ambivalence were satisfied with the outcome, but only if they received the house. If they did not receive the house, those with low ambivalence actually felt worse. There is an interaction of outcome and satisfaction: Those who were rejected were more ambivalent about the house, but only if they were satisfied with the outcome. If they were dissatisfied, those who were rejected were actually less ambivalent.

How would you BEST describe the results? There is a main effect of outcome: People who received the house were more satisfied than those who did not receive the house. There is an interaction between outcome and ambivalence: Those with high ambivalence were satisfied with the outcome, but only if they received the house. If they did not receive the house, those with high ambivalence actually felt worse. There is a main effect of ambivalence: People with high ambivalence were less satisfied than those with low ambivalence. © There is an interaction between outcome and ambivalence: Those with low ambivalence were satisfied with the outcome, but only if they received the house. If they did not receive the house, those with low ambivalence actually felt worse. There is an interaction of outcome and satisfaction: Those who were rejected were more ambivalent about the house, but only if they were satisfied with the outcome. If they were dissatisfied, those who were rejected were actually less ambivalent.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

You want to compare males and females in their use of coping strategies when engaged in conflict in relationships. You send surveys to couples obtained from marriage license application at the county clerk's office. You identify several distinct coping strategies on the survey and have the respondents rate their use of each strategy on a 7-point scale. You then compare scores that come from the two members of each relationship. If testing hypotheses about the effects of gender on use of coping strategies, it would be most appropriate to calculate a ... 1) independent-samples t 2) one sample t 3) paired samples t 4) z test
5
Research study comparing alcohol use for college students in the United States and Canada reports that more Canadian students drink but American students drink more. Is this study an example of an experiment? Answer yes or no and why or why not. Write two answers for this question. If one answer is wrong, the entire answer is wrong?
A researcher designs a study to determine whether female preschoolers prefer sweetened or unsweetened cereal. The researcher uses a box of sweetened colorful cereal and a box of unsweetened tan colored cereal. The research finds that the group of preschoolers ate more of the sweetened colorful cereal and therefore prefers the sweetened cereal. Which two variables are confounded in this experiment? A. color of the cereal and children's gender O B. color of the cereal and sweetness of the cereal O C. sweetness of the cereal and amount of eating D. children's gender and amount of eating Reset Selection MAR 18 étv AA A O gO F3 AA F4 F7 F8 F9 F10 F11 F12 #3 2$ % & * 3 4 5 dele E R Y U %3D G H J K
Exercise is known to produce positive psychological effects. Interestingly, not all exercise is equally effective. It turns out that exercising in a natural environment (e.g., jogging in the woods) produces better psychological outcomes than exercising in urban environments or in homes (Mackay & Neill, 2010). Suppose that a sports psychologist is interested in testing whether there is a difference between exercise in nature and exercise in the lab with respect to post-exercise anxiety levels. The researcher recruits n 5 7 participants who exercise in the lab and exercise on a nature trail. The data below represent the anxiety scores that were measured after each exercise session. Treat the data as if the scores are from an independent-measures study using two separate samples, each with n 5 7 participants. Compute the pooled variance, the estimated standard error for the mean difference, and the independent-measures t statistic. Using a 5 .05, is there a significant difference…
Help!!
Depression A study published in the Archives of GeneralPsychiatry examined the impact of depression on apatient’s ability to survive cardiac disease. Researchersidentified 450 people with cardiac disease, evaluatedthem for depression, and followed the group for 4 years.Of the 361 patients with no depression, 67 died. Of the89 patients with minor or major depression, 26 died.Among people who suffer from cardiac disease, aredepressed patients more likely to die than non-depressedones?a) What kind of design was used to collect these data?b) Write appropriate hypotheses.c) Are the assumptions and conditions necessary forinference satisfied?d) Test the hypothesis and state your conclusion.e) Explain in this context what your P-value means.f) If your conclusion is actually incorrect, which type oferror did you commit?
A high school track coach wanted to test whether giving the students an energy drink could affect performance during the 100 meter race. The coach split the 26 boys into two equal sized groups, where Group 1 was given the energy drink and Group 2 was not. The 100 meter race times were recorded during practice and shown in the table below. What inference can be made about the results? Group 1 Group 2 12.2 13 12.5 12.3 13.3 12.8 12.9 13 13 13.8 12.1 13 13 13 13 13 12.1 13 13 13 12.1 13 12.8 13 13 12.6 Mean: 12.7 Mean: 13 Since the simulation shows ( many cases or free cases )? where a mean difference of ( solve for this answer ) or less occurred when the groups were re-randomized, it can be inferred that the mean difference observed in the study was ( very possibly or very unlikely ) ?due to the random assignment of participants into groups, so the results of the study are (…
A psychologist wanta to determine the effect of relaxing music on a person's reaction to a stressful event. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups. A participant was brought into a room with no windows and only one door. In the background, either soft classical music, or no music at all was playing. After a set amount of time, a fire alarm went off, and smoke started to come from under the door. A hidden video camera records the participants behavior that is later scored by the experimenter for level of panic from 0-100. Which statistical test would be best to determine if there is a significant difference between groups? One sample t test Dependent samples t test Independent t test ANOVA