how should a new procedure or test be allowed as evidence in court? Who makes the decision to admit this evidence? What criteria should they use? How many reviews should be required? If a new technique doesn't meet the criteria, does that mean the technique is invalid?
how should a new procedure or test be allowed as evidence in court? Who makes the decision to admit this evidence? What criteria should they use? How many reviews should be required? If a new technique doesn't meet the criteria, does that mean the technique is invalid?
Related questions
Question
how should a new procedure or test be allowed as evidence in court? Who makes the decision to admit this evidence? What criteria should they use? How many reviews should be required? If a new technique doesn't meet the criteria, does that mean the technique is invalid?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
