how have previously marginalized voices/people in history been presented, and what do their accounts tell or inform us about the general historical narratives that have been previously taught? What do these histories tell us about the study of history? Lastly, are there any shortcomings or criticisms worth noting about these sources?
The study of history is an ever-evolving process that has often been dominated by those in power, leading to the suppression and exclusion of previously marginalized voices. However, in recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the importance of recovering and interpreting sources that provide insight into the experiences and perspectives of these marginalized groups. This has led to a re-evaluation and broadening of historical narratives, revealing alternative viewpoints and experiences that have been overlooked or suppressed. In this context, this answer explores how previously marginalized voices in history have been presented, and what their accounts tell us about the general historical narratives that have been previously taught. Additionally, the answer also considers what these histories tell us about the study of history, and highlights some of the criticisms and shortcomings that need to be considered when interpreting these sources.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
