How do I explain why this is a good outcome? ### Logistic Regression Model Summary**Deviance Residuals:**- Min: -2.9114- 1Q: -0.1921- Median: -0.1226- 3Q: -0.0792- Max: 3.7793**Coefficients:**| Variable | Estimate | Std. Error | z value | Pr(>|z|) ||-------------------------|----------|------------|---------|----------|| (Intercept) | -7.025e+00 | 1.763e-01 | -39.848 | < 2e-16 || Child6-12 | 1.656e-02 | 1.213e-03 | 13.648 | < 2e-16 || Child13-18 | -1.451e-02 | 1.243e-03 | -11.672 | < 2e-16 || Income | 3.733e-05 | 9.518e-07 | 39.229 | < 2e-16 || PaidDirectMailOrders | 8.908e-02 | 2.690e-02 | 3.311 | 0.000929 || DollarsPerIssue | 1.923e+00 | 8.073e-02 | 23.814 | < 2e-16 || MonthsSinceIncOrder | 7.391e-03 | 4.291e-04 | 17.228 | < 2e-16 || MonthsSinceLastOrder | -1.891e-02 | 1.308e-03 | -14.459 | < 2e-16 |**Significance Codes:**- '***' 0- '**' 0.001- '*' 0.01- '.' 0.05- ' ' 0.1**Dispersion parameter for binomial family taken to be 1**- Null deviance: 6261.9 on 31495 degrees of freedom- Residual deviance: 5042.8 on 31492 degrees of freedom- AIC: 5058.8

Name: How do I explain why this is a good outcome? ### Logistic Regression M
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T07:07:37.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: How do I explain why this is a good outcome? ### Logistic Regression Model Summary**Deviance Residuals:**- Min: -2.9114- 1Q: -0.1921- Median: -0.1226- 3Q: -0.0792- Max: 3.7793**Coefficients:**| Variable | Estimate | Std. Error | z valu

Answered: How do I explain why this is a good…

Math

Probability

How do I explain why this is a good outcome?

A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)

10th Edition

ISBN:9780134753119

Author:Sheldon Ross

Publisher:Sheldon Ross

Chapter1: Combinatorial Analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1.1P: a. How many different 7-place license plates are possible if the first 2 places are for letters and...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

How do you do this problem?
ruggling is normal and part of the process of learning. Describe an instance, so far in this course, where you struggled with a problem or concept, and initially had the wrong idea, but then later realized your error. In this instance, in what ways was a struggle or mistake valuable to your eventual understanding? You might also discuss whether struggling built aspects of character in you (e.g., endurance, self-confidence, competence to solve new problems) and how these virtues might benefit you in later ventures. Explain in a few sentences.
how do I do this problem? Please answer all part of the question and show all work and steps so I am able to easily understand it.
how do i solve this question?
Ice cream has been erroneously reported to cause shark attacks. However, better research studies highlight that both increases in ice cream consumption and shark attacks are actually caused by high temperatures in the summer months. Which of the following describes high temperatures as it related to ice cream consumption and shark attacks? It is a mediator. It is a confounder. It is the outcome variable. It is the dependent variable.
Scenario: A researcher wants to study the effects of childhood stress, genetics, and their interaction for predicting aggression in adults. The researcher recruited 40 subjects, 20 reported they had no childhood stress and 20 reported they experienced severe childhood stress. The researcher is specifically interested in looking at the MAOA gene, because different versions of this gene are linked to aggression. The researcher conducts a genetic test and finds that half of subjects in each group have a gene for low MAOA activity and the other half have the gene for high MAOA activity. The researchers have the subjects self-rate their aggressive behavior over the last 6 months. 1. Given the scenario above, what are the null and alternative hypotheses? 2. Experimental design:a. What are the independent and dependent variables in this study? b. How many levels of each independent variable are there? c. What type of factorial ANOVA is this?
Depression A study published in the Archives of GeneralPsychiatry examined the impact of depression on apatient’s ability to survive cardiac disease. Researchersidentified 450 people with cardiac disease, evaluatedthem for depression, and followed the group for 4 years.Of the 361 patients with no depression, 67 died. Of the89 patients with minor or major depression, 26 died.Among people who suffer from cardiac disease, aredepressed patients more likely to die than non-depressedones?a) What kind of design was used to collect these data?b) Write appropriate hypotheses.c) Are the assumptions and conditions necessary forinference satisfied?d) Test the hypothesis and state your conclusion.e) Explain in this context what your P-value means.f) If your conclusion is actually incorrect, which type oferror did you commit?
Plzz explain a) and b)
not A 1995 study by the School of Public Health reported that 87% of male students who live in a fraterity house are binge drinkers. The figure for fraternity members who are residents of a fraternity house is 71 %, while the figure for men who do not belong to a fraternity is 44 % Suppose that 11% of U.S. male students live in a fraternity house, 15% belong to a fraterity but do not live in a fraterity house, and 74% do not belong to a fraterity a. What is the probability that a randomly selected malp student is a binge drinker? b. If a randomly selected male student is a binge drinker, what is the probability that he lives in a fraterity house? The probability that a randomly selected male student is a binge drinker is 0.5509 (Type an integer or a decimal rounded to two decimal places as needed) CETTE
A psychologist would like to examine the effects of different testing methods on the final performance of college students. One group has regular quizzes (n=4), one group has three large exams (n=4), and the third group only has a final exam (n=4). At the end of the course, the psychologist interviews each student to get a measure of the student’s overall knowledge of the material. Quizzes Exams Final Only 4 1 0 N = 12 6 4 2 G = 36 3 5 0 ΣX2 = 164 7 2 2 T = 20 T = 12 T = 4 SS = 10 SS = 10…
Psychologists Erik Erikson suggested that individuals go through eight developmental stages of life. Erikson believed that at stage 8 (age 65 to death), an adult's fear of death can be predicted by the satisfaction they feel when reflecting back on their lives. To investigate, a psychiatrist interviewed a random sample of adults age 65 and older, and scored them on their satisfaction with their lives and their fear of death. The psychiatrist wants to confirm Erikson's theory. What can be concluded with a = 0.01? fear of death satisfied 4 3 4 2 2 10 3 2 4 7 3 4 8. 4 a) Select and compute the appropriate statistic. ---Select--- b) Input the appropriate value(s) to make a decision about Ho. p-value X ; Decision: Fail to reject H0 v c) Using the SPSS results, compute the corresponding effect size(s) and indicate magnitude(s). If not appropriate, input and/or select "na" below.. Effect Size = 0.266 ; Magnitude: na d) Make an interpretation based on the results. More life satisfaction…