Hello,  I have the nex escenary: Case box example 3.3 (page 57) of your 'Leading and Managing in Nursing' eBook: In Estate of Travaglini v. Ingalls Health (2009), an 84-year-old patient was admitted to the hospital with general complaints of “not feeling well.” At the time of his admission, the physician told the admitting nurse that the patient had dysphagia and must be observed whenever he was eating or trying to swallow liquids. At 10:00 that evening, an aide came to the patient’s room and left a sandwich for him to eat. Shortly afterward, the patient’s roommate heard the patient choking and summoned help. At autopsy, it was confirmed that he had aspirated the turkey sandwich, and that this was the cause of the cardiopulmonary arrest that killed the patient. Though liability was found against the aide and her supervisor, the court also upheld a verdict of $500,000 against the hospital.   Can you please help me to explain (short answer) How were both of these ethical principles not upheld in the given scenario? Thank you in advance!

Comprehensive Medical Terminology
4th Edition
ISBN:9781133478850
Author:Jones
Publisher:Jones
Chapter19: Child Health
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem K1CRE
icon
Related questions
Question
100%

Hello, 

I have the nex escenary:

Case box example 3.3 (page 57) of your 'Leading and Managing in Nursing' eBook:

In Estate of Travaglini v. Ingalls Health (2009), an 84-year-old patient was admitted to the hospital with general complaints of “not feeling well.” At the time of his admission, the physician told the admitting nurse that the patient had dysphagia and must be observed whenever he was eating or trying to swallow liquids. At 10:00 that evening, an aide came to the patient’s room and left a sandwich for him to eat. Shortly afterward, the patient’s roommate heard the patient choking and summoned help.

At autopsy, it was confirmed that he had aspirated the turkey sandwich, and that this was the cause of the cardiopulmonary arrest that killed the patient. Though liability was found against the aide and her supervisor, the court also upheld a verdict of $500,000 against the hospital.

 

Can you please help me to explain (short answer) How were both of these ethical principles not upheld in the given scenario?

Thank you in advance!

Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Comprehensive Medical Terminology
Comprehensive Medical Terminology
Nursing
ISBN:
9781133478850
Author:
Jones
Publisher:
Cengage
Case Studies In Health Information Management
Case Studies In Health Information Management
Biology
ISBN:
9781337676908
Author:
SCHNERING
Publisher:
Cengage
Biomedical Instrumentation Systems
Biomedical Instrumentation Systems
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781133478294
Author:
Chatterjee
Publisher:
Cengage
3-2-1 Code It
3-2-1 Code It
Biology
ISBN:
9781337660549
Author:
GREEN
Publisher:
Cengage
Comprehensive Medical Assisting: Administrative a…
Comprehensive Medical Assisting: Administrative a…
Nursing
ISBN:
9781305964792
Author:
Wilburta Q. Lindh, Carol D. Tamparo, Barbara M. Dahl, Julie Morris, Cindy Correa
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles Of Pharmacology Med Assist
Principles Of Pharmacology Med Assist
Biology
ISBN:
9781337512442
Author:
RICE
Publisher:
Cengage