healthy food? The authors of a consumer research paper carried out a study to answer this question. They randomly assigned volunteers into one of three groups. The people in the first group were asked to taste a snack that was described as a new health bar containing high levels of protein, vitamins, and fiber. The people in the second group were asked to taste the same snack but were told it was a tasty chocolate bar with a raspberry center. After tasting the snack, participants were asked to rate their hunger level on a scale from 1 (not at all hungry) to 7 (very hungry). The people in the third group were asked to rate their hunger but were not given a snack. The data in the table are consistent with summary quantities given in the paper (although the sample sizes in the actual study were larger). Treatment Group Hunger Rating Sample Mean Sample Standard Deviation Healthy 5 8 7 4 7 3 4 7 6 5.6667 1.7321 Tasty 4 1 5 2 6 2 5 3 4 3.5556 1.6667 No Snack 3 4 5 6 5 6 2 4 4 4.3333 1.3229 Overall mean = 4.5185 (a) Do these data provide evidence that the mean hunger rating differs for at least two of the treatments ("healthy" snack, "tasty" snack, no snack)? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of 0.05. Find the test statistic. (Round your test statistic to two decimal places.) F = Use technology to find the P-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) P-value = State the conclusion in the problem context. Reject H0. The data provide convincing evidence that the mean hunger rating is not the same for all three treatments.Fail to reject H0. The data do not provide convincing evidence that the mean hunger rating is not the same for all three treatments. Reject H0. The data do not provide convincing evidence that the mean hunger rating is not the same for all three treatments.Fail to reject H0. The data provide convincing evidence that the mean hunger rating is not the same for all three treatments. (b) Is it reasonable to conclude that the mean hunger rating is greater for people who do not get a snack? Explain. It is not reasonable to conclude that the mean hunger rating is greater for people who do not get a snack because the sample mean hunger rating is highest for the healthy snack group.It is reasonable to conclude that the mean hunger rating is greater for people who do not get a snack because the sample mean hunger rating is highest for the no snack group. It is not reasonable to conclude that the mean hunger rating is greater for people who do not get a snack because the sample mean hunger rating is highest for the tasty snack group.It is reasonable to conclude that the mean hunger rating is greater for people who do not get a snack because the sample mean hunger rating is highest for the tasty snack group.It is reasonable to conclude that the mean hunger rating is greater for people who do not get a snack because the sample mean hunger rating is highest for the healthy snack group.
healthy food? The authors of a consumer research paper carried out a study to answer this question. They randomly assigned volunteers into one of three groups. The people in the first group were asked to taste a snack that was described as a new health bar containing high levels of protein, vitamins, and fiber. The people in the second group were asked to taste the same snack but were told it was a tasty chocolate bar with a raspberry center. After tasting the snack, participants were asked to rate their hunger level on a scale from 1 (not at all hungry) to 7 (very hungry). The people in the third group were asked to rate their hunger but were not given a snack. The data in the table are consistent with summary quantities given in the paper (although the sample sizes in the actual study were larger). Treatment Group Hunger Rating Sample Mean Sample Standard Deviation Healthy 5 8 7 4 7 3 4 7 6 5.6667 1.7321 Tasty 4 1 5 2 6 2 5 3 4 3.5556 1.6667 No Snack 3 4 5 6 5 6 2 4 4 4.3333 1.3229 Overall mean = 4.5185 (a) Do these data provide evidence that the mean hunger rating differs for at least two of the treatments ("healthy" snack, "tasty" snack, no snack)? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of 0.05. Find the test statistic. (Round your test statistic to two decimal places.) F = Use technology to find the P-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) P-value = State the conclusion in the problem context. Reject H0. The data provide convincing evidence that the mean hunger rating is not the same for all three treatments.Fail to reject H0. The data do not provide convincing evidence that the mean hunger rating is not the same for all three treatments. Reject H0. The data do not provide convincing evidence that the mean hunger rating is not the same for all three treatments.Fail to reject H0. The data provide convincing evidence that the mean hunger rating is not the same for all three treatments. (b) Is it reasonable to conclude that the mean hunger rating is greater for people who do not get a snack? Explain. It is not reasonable to conclude that the mean hunger rating is greater for people who do not get a snack because the sample mean hunger rating is highest for the healthy snack group.It is reasonable to conclude that the mean hunger rating is greater for people who do not get a snack because the sample mean hunger rating is highest for the no snack group. It is not reasonable to conclude that the mean hunger rating is greater for people who do not get a snack because the sample mean hunger rating is highest for the tasty snack group.It is reasonable to conclude that the mean hunger rating is greater for people who do not get a snack because the sample mean hunger rating is highest for the tasty snack group.It is reasonable to conclude that the mean hunger rating is greater for people who do not get a snack because the sample mean hunger rating is highest for the healthy snack group.
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
Do people feel hungrier after sampling a healthy food? The authors of a consumer research paper carried out a study to answer this question. They randomly assigned volunteers into one of three groups. The people in the first group were asked to taste a snack that was described as a new health bar containing high levels of protein, vitamins, and fiber. The people in the second group were asked to taste the same snack but were told it was a tasty chocolate bar with a raspberry center. After tasting the snack, participants were asked to rate their hunger level on a scale from 1 (not at all hungry) to 7 (very hungry). The people in the third group were asked to rate their hunger but were not given a snack.
The data in the table are consistent with summary quantities given in the paper (although the sample sizes in the actual study were larger).
Treatment Group |
Hunger Rating | Sample |
Sample Standard Deviation |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Healthy | 5 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 5.6667 | 1.7321 |
Tasty | 4 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3.5556 | 1.6667 |
No Snack | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4.3333 | 1.3229 |
Overall mean = 4.5185 |
(a)
Do these data provide evidence that the mean hunger rating differs for at least two of the treatments ("healthy" snack, "tasty" snack, no snack)? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of 0.05.
Find the test statistic. (Round your test statistic to two decimal places.)
F =
Use technology to find the P-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
P-value =
State the conclusion in the problem context.
Reject H0. The data provide convincing evidence that the mean hunger rating is not the same for all three treatments.Fail to reject H0. The data do not provide convincing evidence that the mean hunger rating is not the same for all three treatments. Reject H0. The data do not provide convincing evidence that the mean hunger rating is not the same for all three treatments.Fail to reject H0. The data provide convincing evidence that the mean hunger rating is not the same for all three treatments.
(b)
Is it reasonable to conclude that the mean hunger rating is greater for people who do not get a snack? Explain.
It is not reasonable to conclude that the mean hunger rating is greater for people who do not get a snack because the sample mean hunger rating is highest for the healthy snack group.It is reasonable to conclude that the mean hunger rating is greater for people who do not get a snack because the sample mean hunger rating is highest for the no snack group. It is not reasonable to conclude that the mean hunger rating is greater for people who do not get a snack because the sample mean hunger rating is highest for the tasty snack group.It is reasonable to conclude that the mean hunger rating is greater for people who do not get a snack because the sample mean hunger rating is highest for the tasty snack group.It is reasonable to conclude that the mean hunger rating is greater for people who do not get a snack because the sample mean hunger rating is highest for the healthy snack group.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 1 images
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman