Health researchers wish to compare the efficacy of the Moderna vs. Pfizer Vaccine. Here are 4 possible reasons that it would not make sense to run a matched pair experiment for such a study. Pick the TWO that are correct. 1: You would not be able to find twins willing to be part of such an experiment 2: You could not get two large independent samples for the purposes of comparison. 3: It would be hard to match two people for this test, since researchers do not yet understand what individual factors contribute to the variation of immunity to this disease. 4: It would make no sense to test both vaccines on one person and compare the outcomes. The two that are correct are: 1 and 4 The two that are correct are: 1 and 3 Ob. The two that are correct are: OC. 1 and 4 The two that are correct are: O d. 2 and 3 The two that are correct are: 3 and 4 Oe.

Health researchers wish to compare the efficacy of the Moderna vs. Pfizer Vaccine. Here are 4 possible reasons that it would not make sense to run a matched pair experiment for such a study. Pick the TWO that are correct. 1: You would not be able to find twins willing to be part of such an experiment 2: You could not get two large independent samples for the purposes of comparison. 3: It would be hard to match two people for this test, since researchers do not yet understand what individual factors contribute to the variation of immunity to this disease. 4: It would make no sense to test both vaccines on one person and compare the outcomes. The two that are correct are: 1 and 4 The two that are correct are: 1 and 3 Ob. The two that are correct are: OC. 1 and 4 The two that are correct are: O d. 2 and 3 The two that are correct are: 3 and 4 Oe.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

If the power of an experiment is low then The experiment will likely be inconclusive. Any significant findings obtained are suspect. The results are skewed.
Suppose you were presented with the results of a study comparing two different training methods for basketball athletes. You are told 32 athletes were randomly assigned to the two groups so that 16 were in the group A and 16 were in the group B. At the end of the session, the average scores (wins versus losses) of the two groups/teams were compared and a difference of 10% was observed ( the first team had 10% more wins than the second). The coach observer reports two- sample t-test shows this difference is statistically significant. How would you interpret these findings? What questions or concerns would you have? How might this type of study be improved? Hint: Consider the possibility that the test performed was not the appropriate one.
Answer true or false to the following statements and explain your answers.a. If the blocking factor in a randomized block design is a random effect factor, the F-test for the effect of the treatment factor is still valid when there is interaction between the treatment and blocking factors.b. The F-test for the effect of the blocking factor in a randomized block ANOVA is still valid when there is interaction between the treatment and blocking factors.c. The presence of interaction between the treatment factor and blocking factor in a randomized block design is easy to assess from interaction plots.
For several decades, it was a common practice in Southern California for houses to be built with pools in the backyard (as any airplane flight which ends at a Southern California airport will reveal). Now, however, that practice may be changing, possibly because of the recent demand for landscaped homes, which experts believe help reduce pollution. A recent study examined a random sample of 167 houses built in Southern California between 1950 and 1985 and an independent, random sample of 80 houses built in Southern California from 1992 to the present. The sample of houses built in 1950-1985 contained 71 houses with pools, and the sample of houses built from 1992-present contained 31 houses with pools. Based on this survey, can we conclude, at the 0.05 level of significance, that the proportion p1 of all Southern California houses built in 1950-1985 that were built with pools is greater than the proportion p2 of all Southern California houses built from…
23-
A depression study reports the following findings. There were no significant differences on depression symptoms across ethnic groups (Asian, latino, caucasian, African american ) or across treatment location.(home vs. clinic). Which of the following statements about the design is TRUE. 1. This would be considered a 2×2 ANOVA 2. There are 4 independent variables included here. 3. The ethnicity variable has 4 level and the treatment location variable has 2 levels. 4.There's a total of 4 separate group in this study.
You are a medical researcher that wants to determine if your new drug can lower people's blood pressure. You recruit 60 participants with high blood pressure to be part of your study. You randomly assign participants to one of three groups to receive either 10 mg of your drug, 5 mg, or 0 mg (given as a placebo control). After 2 weeks, participants' blood pressure is measured and you compare among the 3 groups. Which statistical test would be best to determine if there is a significant difference in blood pressure among the three groups?
Acne is a common skin disease that affects most adolescents and can continue into adulthood. A study compared the effectiveness of three acne treatments and a placebo, all in gel form, applied twice daily for 12 weeks. The study's 517 teenage volunteers were randomly assigned to one of the four treatments. Success was assessed as clear or almost clear skin at the end of the 12 week period. The results of the study can be seen in the table below. Using the appropriate statistical test, determine if there is significant evidence that the four treatments perform differently. If so, how do they compare.
What kind of test is used for this problem? How is it solved step by step?
You recently completed an experiment concerning the effects of carbs on happiness. One group of 11 people are assigned a high carb diet, another group of 11 people are assigned a moderate-high carb diet, another group of 11 people are assigned a moderate-low carb diet, and a final group of 11 people are assigned a low carb diet. If I find that I fail to reject the null hypothesis, what might my next step be? Group of answer choices Change my analysis and alpha to make the finding significant and then run post-hoc tests. 1. Run multiple dependent measures t-tests to see if there are any significant differences between particular groups 2. Run multiple independent samples t-tests to see if there are any significant differences between particular groups 3. Change my hypothesis to see if I can find something significant with a different hypothesis for this study 4. Run home and binge-watch Bridgerton because there is nothing else that should be done statistically
5. Use the data set 1. This is the result of a randomized trial in Uganda where 10 students in the same village were selected and given a solar-powered reading lamp. The second group was not given any lamp. The number of students out of 10 who improved their school grades for both groups were recorded. The experiment was repeated in 50 villages. Test the hypothesis that solar-powered reading lamps are effective in improving school grades in Uganda.
A study is testing the effectiveness of a new allergy medication. Sixty people who reported they have allergies volunteered to be part of the study and were randomly assigned to one of two groups, as shown in the design web. 30 Receive Medication Randomly Assigned Compare Level of Allerg Symptoms after Severa Weeks 60 Subjects 30 Receive Placebo Which of the following accurately describes the benefit of comparison in the experiment shown in the design web? The level of allergic symptoms in both groups can be compared to see if the new medication had a significant effect. The overall level of allergic symptoms can be used to determine if the new allergy medication had a significant effect. The level of allergic symptoms in the group who received the medication can be used to determine if the medication had a significant effect. The level of allergic symptoms in both groups cannot be compared to determine if the medication had a significant effect because one group only received a…