The template on how to answer these questions is on the images below. 1. Jim is an undercover police officer. He is working undercover on a case where Tom is planning to rob a bank. In the operation, Jim befriends Tony to gain his trust. Tom tells Jim about his plans to rob a bank. Jim offers to drive the get away car. Can Jim be found guilty of Accomplice Liability? Why or why not? 2. Jim, Kevin, and Tom are robbing a bank. Jim is the primary actor. Jim’s ex-wife walks into the bank during the robbery. Jim hates his ex-wife and decides to shoot her during the robbery. Can Kevin and Tom be held liable as Accomplices for Jim shooting his ex-wife? Why or why not? 5:44 PM Mon Oct 3learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet02-xythos.content.blackboardcdn.comDo thiThe following are examples on how to answer questions in which you are asked todetermine if a crime occurred. NO OTHER FORMAT WILL BE ACCEPTABLE. You mustapply all the elements of the crime. You must list/bullet point the elements and do NOT use aparagraph format. List the elements out individually as shown belowExample 1: Jim went out to dinner one night. While enjoying his chicken parmigiana, henoticed, Lisa, his ex-wife, walk into the restaurant with another man, named Tom. Tom began totaunt Jim by kissing Lisa. This upset Jim. Jim walked up to Tom and Lisa and punched Tom inthe face. Tom did not suffer any injuries. What crime did Jim commit, if any? Fully explainapplying all of the elements.Jim committed the crime of Battery.Actus Reus: Touching or applying force. Here, Jim met the Actus Reus by applying forcewhen he punched JimMens Rea: Intent to Injure OR Intent to Touch Offensively. Here, Jim met the first type ofintent for battery, the Intent to Injure, when he punched Tom in the face. This is shown becauseJim was upset at Tom when he punched him and wanted to cause him injury. Therefore, theMens Rea was met.Harm: Bodily Injury or Offensive Touching. Tom did not suffer any injury, however, punchingsomeone in the face is an Offensive Touching. Therefore, this element was metBecause all of the elements of Battery were met, Tom is guilty of BatteryExample 2: Kevin was in financial trouble. He decided to burn his house to collect theinsurance money. He poured gasoline on the shingles and lit them. The shingles lit on fire andmost of his house burned down. What crime, if any, did Kevin commit. Fully explain applyingall the46% 5:44 PM Mon Oct 31 of 2learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet02-xythos.content.blackboardcdn.comExample 2: Kevin was in financial trouble. He decided to burn his house to collect theinsurance money. He poured gasoline on the shingles and lit them. The shingles lit on fire andmost of his house burned down. What crime, if any, did Kevin commit. Fully explain applyingall the elements.Kevin did NOT commit Common Law ArsonActus Reus: A Burning. The element of burning requires a charring. In this case, there wasdefinitely a charring as most of the house burned downHouse/Dwelling: This element was met because it was a houseOf Another: This element fails because Kevin burned his own house, not one of anotherMens Rea: Malicious and Willful Intent to Burn. Kevin met this element because it was hisintent to burn the house when he poured the gas and lit the shingles on fireBecause the element "Of Another" was not met because Kevin burned his own house, he is notguilty of Common Law Arson.46%

Answered: he template on how to answer these…

Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)

5th Edition

ISBN:9780134477961

Author:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White

Publisher:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White

Chapter1: The Science Of Psychology

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1TY

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

The template on how to answer these questions is on the images below.

1. Jim is an undercover police officer. He is working undercover on a case where Tom is planning to rob a bank. In the operation, Jim befriends Tony to gain his trust. Tom tells Jim about his plans to rob a bank. Jim offers to drive the get away car. Can Jim be found guilty of Accomplice Liability? Why or why not?

2. Jim, Kevin, and Tom are robbing a bank. Jim is the primary actor. Jim’s ex-wife walks into the bank during the robbery. Jim hates his ex-wife and decides to shoot her during the robbery. Can Kevin and Tom be held liable as Accomplices for Jim shooting his ex-wife? Why or why not?