Groundwater wells are known to begin pumping sand once it becomes exploited (old), and this may damage the subsequent water treatment processes. To solve this problem, two alternatives are proposed: A new well can be drilled at a capital cost of $385,000 with minimal operating and maintenance expenses of $20,500 per year. A settling tank can be constructed ahead of the treatment processes which will cost $190,000 to build and $32,100 per year to operate and maintain.

Essentials Of Investments
11th Edition
ISBN:9781260013924
Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Chapter1: Investments: Background And Issues
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1PS
icon
Related questions
Question
Problem 2
Groundwater wells are known to begin pumping sand once it becomes exploited (old), and this
may damage the subsequent water treatment processes. To solve this problem, two alternatives are
proposed:
A new well can be drilled at a capital cost of $385,000 with minimal operating and
maintenance expenses of $20,500 per year.
A settling tank can be constructed ahead of the treatment processes which will cost
$190,000 to build and $32,100 per year to operate and maintain.
The salvage value of either option at EOY 20 is 10% of the capital investment. Using a MARR of
7%:
(a) Which alternative is better for the 20-year study period (using the present worth method)?
(b) Confirm the answer of (a) using the future worth method (state the future worth for each
of the alternatives and make a decision based on these values)?
Transcribed Image Text:Problem 2 Groundwater wells are known to begin pumping sand once it becomes exploited (old), and this may damage the subsequent water treatment processes. To solve this problem, two alternatives are proposed: A new well can be drilled at a capital cost of $385,000 with minimal operating and maintenance expenses of $20,500 per year. A settling tank can be constructed ahead of the treatment processes which will cost $190,000 to build and $32,100 per year to operate and maintain. The salvage value of either option at EOY 20 is 10% of the capital investment. Using a MARR of 7%: (a) Which alternative is better for the 20-year study period (using the present worth method)? (b) Confirm the answer of (a) using the future worth method (state the future worth for each of the alternatives and make a decision based on these values)?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Essentials Of Investments
Essentials Of Investments
Finance
ISBN:
9781260013924
Author:
Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:
Mcgraw-hill Education,
FUNDAMENTALS OF CORPORATE FINANCE
FUNDAMENTALS OF CORPORATE FINANCE
Finance
ISBN:
9781260013962
Author:
BREALEY
Publisher:
RENT MCG
Financial Management: Theory & Practice
Financial Management: Theory & Practice
Finance
ISBN:
9781337909730
Author:
Brigham
Publisher:
Cengage
Foundations Of Finance
Foundations Of Finance
Finance
ISBN:
9780134897264
Author:
KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. William
Publisher:
Pearson,
Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou…
Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou…
Finance
ISBN:
9781337395250
Author:
Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i…
Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i…
Finance
ISBN:
9780077861759
Author:
Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan Professor
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education