Globular clusters contain no stars more massive than the Sun. Which of the following seems like the least reasonable implication of this observation? Group of answer choices Globular clusters are very old. Globular clusters are very young. Only the low-mass stars are still "alive" in the clusters. Many red giants can probably be found in globular clusters. The very massive stars in the globular clusters have already burnt out.
Stellar evolution
We may see thousands of stars in the dark sky. Our universe consists of billions of stars. Stars may appear tiny to us but they are huge balls of gasses. Sun is a star of average size. Some stars are even a thousand times larger than the sun. The stars do not exist forever they have a certain lifetime. The life span of the sun is about 10 billion years. The star undergoes various changes during its lifetime, this process is called stellar evolution. The structure of the sun-like star is shown below.
Red Shift
It is an astronomical phenomenon. In this phenomenon, increase in wavelength with corresponding decrease in photon energy and frequency of radiation of light. It is the displacement of spectrum of any kind of astronomical object to the longer wavelengths (red) side.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 7 steps