Given that me = 0.5 MeV. show that Delta E is a small correction compared to the observed value of the electron mass.

icon
Related questions
Question

Given that me
= 0.5 MeV. show that Delta E is a small
correction compared to the observed value of the electron mass.

### 1. Vacuum Polarization

On length scales smaller than \( L \sim (2m_e)^{-1} \), the production of virtual \( e^+e^- \) pairs ends up polarizing the vacuum around a charge. This ends up screening a charge and reducing the effective potential at short distances. The effective (observed) mass of the electron is then:

\[
m_e^{\text{(observed)}} = m_e^{\text{(bare)}} + \Delta E,
\]

where \(\Delta E \approx \alpha(2m_e) \) and \(\alpha = e^2/4\pi \approx 1/137\). [Flip: Corrected 5/24: previously this said \(\Delta E \approx \alpha(2m_e)^{-1}\). Thanks Robert V.] The bare electron mass is simply some number in the Lagrangian, but it is never directly observed. Given that \(m_e = 0.5 \text{ MeV}\), show that \(\Delta E\) is a small correction compared to the observed value of the electron mass.

#### Graphical Explanation:
The diagram on the left represents a conceptual electron as a sphere, while the diagram on the right provides a more detailed view. The right diagram shows the electron surrounded by virtual \( e^+e^- \) pairs. The polarization effect occurs within a distance \( r \sim \frac{1}{2m_e} \).

The virtual pairs are shown as small circles labeled \( e^+ \) and \( e^- \) around the central electron charge. This visualization helps illustrate the concept of vacuum polarization and the resultant screening effect, leading to the adjusted effective mass of the electron.

### Key Equations:
\[
\begin{aligned}
m_e^{\text{(observed)}} &= m_e^{\text{(bare)}} + \Delta E, \\
\Delta E &\approx \alpha(2m_e), \\
\alpha &= \frac{e^2}{4\pi} \approx \frac{1}{137}.
\end{aligned}
\]

Given the context, students are encouraged to compute the small correction \(\Delta E\) relative to the electron mass \( m_e = 0.5 \text{ MeV} \).

This topic is central to quantum field theory and sheds light on how virtual particles affect observable
Transcribed Image Text:### 1. Vacuum Polarization On length scales smaller than \( L \sim (2m_e)^{-1} \), the production of virtual \( e^+e^- \) pairs ends up polarizing the vacuum around a charge. This ends up screening a charge and reducing the effective potential at short distances. The effective (observed) mass of the electron is then: \[ m_e^{\text{(observed)}} = m_e^{\text{(bare)}} + \Delta E, \] where \(\Delta E \approx \alpha(2m_e) \) and \(\alpha = e^2/4\pi \approx 1/137\). [Flip: Corrected 5/24: previously this said \(\Delta E \approx \alpha(2m_e)^{-1}\). Thanks Robert V.] The bare electron mass is simply some number in the Lagrangian, but it is never directly observed. Given that \(m_e = 0.5 \text{ MeV}\), show that \(\Delta E\) is a small correction compared to the observed value of the electron mass. #### Graphical Explanation: The diagram on the left represents a conceptual electron as a sphere, while the diagram on the right provides a more detailed view. The right diagram shows the electron surrounded by virtual \( e^+e^- \) pairs. The polarization effect occurs within a distance \( r \sim \frac{1}{2m_e} \). The virtual pairs are shown as small circles labeled \( e^+ \) and \( e^- \) around the central electron charge. This visualization helps illustrate the concept of vacuum polarization and the resultant screening effect, leading to the adjusted effective mass of the electron. ### Key Equations: \[ \begin{aligned} m_e^{\text{(observed)}} &= m_e^{\text{(bare)}} + \Delta E, \\ \Delta E &\approx \alpha(2m_e), \\ \alpha &= \frac{e^2}{4\pi} \approx \frac{1}{137}. \end{aligned} \] Given the context, students are encouraged to compute the small correction \(\Delta E\) relative to the electron mass \( m_e = 0.5 \text{ MeV} \). This topic is central to quantum field theory and sheds light on how virtual particles affect observable
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer