Game theory: Consider a collective action game with thirty individuals (N = 30). When the number of participants in the joint project is n, each individual, including shirkers, receives a benefit of B(n) = 18n and each participant incurs a cost of C(n) = 32 – 2n. Please answer the questions I am asking! 1. Find all of the Nash equilibria, both stable and unstable ones. 2. Find the socially optimal outcome. 3. Check if any of the Nash equilibria is socially optimal. Explain your answer.

Game theory: Consider a collective action game with thirty individuals (N = 30). When the number of participants in the joint project is n, each individual, including shirkers, receives a benefit of B(n) = 18n and each participant incurs a cost of C(n) = 32 – 2n. Please answer the questions I am asking! 1. Find all of the Nash equilibria, both stable and unstable ones. 2. Find the socially optimal outcome. 3. Check if any of the Nash equilibria is socially optimal. Explain your answer.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

MULTIPLE CHOICE (identify the one best answer below and explain your reasoning for each option): If James is the leader in the game then: (hint: you can draw the game tree to see it better)a. There are two equilibrium outcomes that coincide with the Nash equilibria.b. The unique equilibrium outcome is James playing Rooster and Buzz playing Chicken.c. The equilibrium outcome is the same as if Buzz were the leader.d. All of the above.e. None of the above
The game, "the battle of the sexes" (discussed in class) has pure strategy Nash Equilibria and mixed strategy Nash Equilibrium (again in numbers). Of these 3 strategy, are pareto efficient. true or false?
Game theory. Explain Nash equilibrium in pure strategies elaborately with a case study/problem (first define it) covering everything under a single problem (handwritten).
Player 2 1 2 3 1 (0,2) (1,0) (0,2) (0,2) Player 1 2 (1,0) (1,0) 3 (0,2) (1,0) (0,2) 1. Find all pure. strategy Nash equilibria 2. Does the game have a mixed strategy equilibrium? If so, find one. Otherwise, provide an explanation
Show that there does not exist a pure-strategy perfect Bayesian equilibrium in the following extensive-form game. What is the mixed- strategy perfect Bayesian equilibrium? R Player 1 M L Player 2 3
rock paper scissors rock 0. -3 0. раper scissors -1 -1 3. 0. (a) Show that xT= (,) and yT= (,) together are not a Nash equilibrium 3' 3 3131 for this modified game.
Player 2 Middle Left P1: $45 P1: $70 Up P2: $45 P2: $50 Player 1 P1: $50 P1: $60 Middle P2: $50 P2: $60 P1: $60 P1: $50 Down P2: $60 P2: $70 In the game shown above, list all of the Nash Equilibrium (please check ALL that apply) (up, left) (up, middle) (up, right) (middle, left) (middle, middle) (middle, right) (down, left) (down, middle) (down, right) No equilibrium Right P1: $45 P2: $60 P1: $50 P2: $70 P1: $60 P2: $60
help please answer in text form with proper workings and explanation for each and every part and steps with concept and introduction no AI no copy paste remember answer must be in proper format with all working
Cooperative Games - Game Theory
For the friend-foe game, recall that there were 3 Nash equilibria possible, but the equilibria set didn't include the cooperative outcome, for which both players would win. Friend Foe Friend 500,500 0,1000 Foe 1000,0 0.0 a) If the game is played répeatedly. propose a play strategy that will enforce cooperation. For what valucs of o (discount factor) the equilibrium will be (Friend. Friend)?
5
Answer with proper explanation. Thanks