Two neighboring homeowners, i = 1,2, simultaneously choose how many hours to spend maintaining a lawn. The AVERAGE benefit per hour for i is (e.g., it is for homeowner 1)And the (opportunity) cost per hour for each homeowner is 4.(a) Give each homeowner’s (net) payoff as a function of and .(b) Compute the Nash equilibrium. Two neighboring homeowners, $ j = 1, 2 $, simultaneously choose how many hours $ I_j $ to spend maintaining a lawn. The AVERAGE benefit per hour for $ j $ is \[ 10 - I_j + \frac{I_{\bar{j}}}{2} \](e.g., it is $ 10 - I_1 + \frac{I_2}{2} $ for homeowner 1)And the (opportunity) cost per hour for each homeowner is 4.(a) Give each homeowner's (net) payoff as a function of $ I_1 $ and $ I_2 $.(b) Compute the Nash equilibrium.

Answered: Give each homeowner’s (net) payoff as a…

Business

Economics

Give each homeowner’s (net) payoff as a function of and . (b) Compute the Nash equilibrium.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Question 2. Two students are working together to submit their Microeconomics mid-semester group coursework. Each student i can put in the effort x; that costs c(x;), in which x; E [0, 1]. This gives each student the utility of u(x1, x2). Formu- late this situation as a strategic game.
Consider the two period Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma Game where each player is interested in the SUM of the payoffs she gets in each period. Players see the outcome after the play in each period. (The period payoffs are 10,5,1,0.) (i) Write out this game in its strategic form. (ii) Find all Nash equilibria and all Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibria.
Jane is interested in buying a car from a used car dealer. Her maximum willingness to pay for thecar is 12 ($12,000). Bo, the dealer, is willing to sell the car as long as he receives at least 9($9,000). What is the Nash bargaining solution to this game?
Problem 2. Consider the partnership-game we discussed in Lecture 3 (pages 81-87 of the textbook). Now change the setup of the game so that player 1 chooses x = [0, 4], and after observing the choice of x, player 2 chooses y ≤ [0, 4]. The payoffs are the same as before. (a) Find all SPNE (subgame perfect Nash equilibria) in pure strategies. (b) Can you find a Nash equilibrium, with player 1 choosing x = 1, that is not subgame perfect? Explain.
Suppose the following game is played infinite times in the future. Time discount is 0.90. What should be the value of x so that the equilibrium strategy is (Cooperate, Cooperate)? Player 2 Player 1 Cooperate Defect Cooperate (x, x) (2, 14) Defect (14, 2) (5, 5)
which is the nash equilibrium? small pig does press large pig does press (20, 130), small pig doesn't press large pig does press (140, 10), small pig does press large pig doesn't press (-5, 150), small pig does not press large pig doesn't press (0,0).
Note: The answer should be typed.
The US and Canada have overfished North Atlantic cod stocks nearly to the point of extinction. Both countries wish to preserve the cod industry (and hence the cod stocks), so the two countries sign an agreement to limit fish hauls. Each country has two possible strategies: comply with the agreement (limit fishing) or renege on the agreement (overfish). Each country’s payoffs for different strategy combinations are given in the matrix below. The numbers in the cells represent utilities, and the payoff ordering is (US, Canada). QUESTIONS: 1.If this is a one-shot game (i.e., it is played once), do the players have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? Briefly explain your answer. 2.What is the equilibrium of this game? Is it Pareto-optimal? How do you know?
= a) Suppose x 4 and y = 3. After all strategies that are dominated by a pure strategy are iteratively deleted for both players, how many strategies remain for Player 1? b) Suppose x = 4 and y = 3. After all strategies that are dominated by a pure strategy are iteratively deleted for both players, how many strategies remain for Player 2? c) Suppose x = 4 and y = 3. What is the sum of both players' payoffs in all pure strategy Nash equilibria of the game? d) Suppose x = 4 and y = 11. After all strategies that are dominated by a pure strategy are iteratively deleted for both players, how many strategies remain for Player 1? e) Suppose x = 4 and y = 11. After all strategies that are dominated by a pure strategy are iteratively deleted for both players, how many strategies remain for Player 2? f) Suppose x = 4 and y = 11. What is the sum of both players' payoffs in all pure strategy Nash equilibria of the game?