Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Science
Physics
Four students are arguing over why the kids keep falling in the video. lan says "When the child kicks the ball, the ball is more massive than the child's foot, so the force of the ball on the foot is greater than the force of the child's foot on the ball. According to Newton's 2nd Law, this unbalanced force propels the child's foot backwards and the child falls." Tammy says, "According to Newton's 3rd law, the force on the ball and the force on the foot are equal and opposite, so the reason the child falls is that the child is lighter than the ball." Jordan says "According to Newton's 1st law, since the child is in motion they will want to stay in motion. When the force of the ball acts on the foot, the foot stops unexpectedly, and the child falls forward because inertia keeps the rest of the child's body in motion." David says "According to Newton's 1st law, the ball is at rest and wants to stay at rest. When the child kicks the ball, Newton's 2nd law says the force of gravity keeps it still, and Newton's 3rd law means the reaction force of gravity flips the child's foot up in the air and flips them." hat change in reasoning would make Jordan's explanation more appropriate/correct? O The foot doesn't stop completely, it feels a force opposite its motion that slows it relative to the rest of the body. O The force of the ball does not act on the foot, the force of the foot acts on the ball. O Newton's 1st law states objects in motion want to come to rest. Inertia doesn't keep the child's body in motion, the force of the ball propels the foot backward.

Four students are arguing over why the kids keep falling in the video. lan says "When the child kicks the ball, the ball is more massive than the child's foot, so the force of the ball on the foot is greater than the force of the child's foot on the ball. According to Newton's 2nd Law, this unbalanced force propels the child's foot backwards and the child falls." Tammy says, "According to Newton's 3rd law, the force on the ball and the force on the foot are equal and opposite, so the reason the child falls is that the child is lighter than the ball." Jordan says "According to Newton's 1st law, since the child is in motion they will want to stay in motion. When the force of the ball acts on the foot, the foot stops unexpectedly, and the child falls forward because inertia keeps the rest of the child's body in motion." David says "According to Newton's 1st law, the ball is at rest and wants to stay at rest. When the child kicks the ball, Newton's 2nd law says the force of gravity keeps it still, and Newton's 3rd law means the reaction force of gravity flips the child's foot up in the air and flips them." hat change in reasoning would make Jordan's explanation more appropriate/correct? O The foot doesn't stop completely, it feels a force opposite its motion that slows it relative to the rest of the body. O The force of the ball does not act on the foot, the force of the foot acts on the ball. O Newton's 1st law states objects in motion want to come to rest. Inertia doesn't keep the child's body in motion, the force of the ball propels the foot backward.

College Physics
College Physics
11th Edition
ISBN:9781305952300
Author:Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Publisher:Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Chapter1: Units, Trigonometry. And Vectors
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1CQ: Estimate the order of magnitude of the length, in meters, of each of the following; (a) a mouse, (b)...
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question

Practice

Four students are arguing over why the kids keep falling in the video. lan says "When the child kicks the ball, the ball is more massive than the child's foot, so the force of the ball on the foot is greater than the child's foot on the ball. According to Newton's 2nd Law, this unbalanced force propels the child's foot backwards and the child falls." force of Tammy says, "According to Newton's 3rd law, the force on the ball and the force on the foot are equal and opposite, so the reason the child falls is that the child is lighter than the ball." Jordan says "According to Newton's 1st law, since the child is in motion they will want to stay in motion. When the force of the ball acts on the foot, the foot stops unexpectedly, and the child falls forward because inertia keeps the rest of the child's body in motion." David says "According to Newton's 1st law, the ball is at rest and wants to stay at rest. When the child kicks the ball, Newton's 2nd law says the force of gravity keeps it still, and Newton's 3rd law means the reaction force of gravity flips the child's foot up in the air and flips them." What change in reasoning would make Jordan's explanation more appropriate/correct? O The foot doesn't stop completely, it feels a force opposite its motion that slows it relative to the rest of the body. O The force of the ball does not act on the foot, the force of the foot acts on the ball. O Newton's 1st law states objects in motion want to come to rest. O Inertia doesn't keep the child's body in motion, the force of the ball propels the foot backward.
Transcribed Image Text:Four students are arguing over why the kids keep falling in the video. lan says "When the child kicks the ball, the ball is more massive than the child's foot, so the force of the ball on the foot is greater than the child's foot on the ball. According to Newton's 2nd Law, this unbalanced force propels the child's foot backwards and the child falls." force of Tammy says, "According to Newton's 3rd law, the force on the ball and the force on the foot are equal and opposite, so the reason the child falls is that the child is lighter than the ball." Jordan says "According to Newton's 1st law, since the child is in motion they will want to stay in motion. When the force of the ball acts on the foot, the foot stops unexpectedly, and the child falls forward because inertia keeps the rest of the child's body in motion." David says "According to Newton's 1st law, the ball is at rest and wants to stay at rest. When the child kicks the ball, Newton's 2nd law says the force of gravity keeps it still, and Newton's 3rd law means the reaction force of gravity flips the child's foot up in the air and flips them." What change in reasoning would make Jordan's explanation more appropriate/correct? O The foot doesn't stop completely, it feels a force opposite its motion that slows it relative to the rest of the body. O The force of the ball does not act on the foot, the force of the foot acts on the ball. O Newton's 1st law states objects in motion want to come to rest. O Inertia doesn't keep the child's body in motion, the force of the ball propels the foot backward.
Four students are arguing over why the kids keep falling in the video. lan says "When the child kicks the ball, the ball is more massive than the child's foot, so the force of the ball on the foot is greater than the force of the child's foot on the ball. According to Newton's 2nd Law, this unbalanced force propels the child's foot backwards and the child falls." Tammy says, "According to Newton's 3rd law, the force on the ball and the force on the foot are equal and opposite, so the reason the child falls is that the child is lighter than the ball." Jordan says "According to Newton's 1st law, since the child is in motion they will want to stay in motion. When the force of the ball acts on the foot, the foot stops unexpectedly, and the child falls forward because inertia keeps the rest of the child's body in motion." David says "According to Newton's 1st law, the ball is at rest and wants to stay at rest. When the child kicks the ball, Newton's 2nd law says the force of gravity keeps it still, and Newton's 3rd law means the reaction force of gravity flips the child's foot up in the air and flips them." What change in reasoning would make David's explanation more appropriate/correct? O If the unbalanced force on the child's foot was a reaction to the kicking force, not gravity O If Newton's 1st Law said objects at rest want to start in motion. O If Newton's 2nd Law said objects at rest stay at rest. O All of the above
Transcribed Image Text:Four students are arguing over why the kids keep falling in the video. lan says "When the child kicks the ball, the ball is more massive than the child's foot, so the force of the ball on the foot is greater than the force of the child's foot on the ball. According to Newton's 2nd Law, this unbalanced force propels the child's foot backwards and the child falls." Tammy says, "According to Newton's 3rd law, the force on the ball and the force on the foot are equal and opposite, so the reason the child falls is that the child is lighter than the ball." Jordan says "According to Newton's 1st law, since the child is in motion they will want to stay in motion. When the force of the ball acts on the foot, the foot stops unexpectedly, and the child falls forward because inertia keeps the rest of the child's body in motion." David says "According to Newton's 1st law, the ball is at rest and wants to stay at rest. When the child kicks the ball, Newton's 2nd law says the force of gravity keeps it still, and Newton's 3rd law means the reaction force of gravity flips the child's foot up in the air and flips them." What change in reasoning would make David's explanation more appropriate/correct? O If the unbalanced force on the child's foot was a reaction to the kicking force, not gravity O If Newton's 1st Law said objects at rest want to start in motion. O If Newton's 2nd Law said objects at rest stay at rest. O All of the above
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Third law of motion
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, physics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
College Physics
College Physics
Physics
ISBN:
9781305952300
Author:
Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
University Physics (14th Edition)
University Physics (14th Edition)
Physics
ISBN:
9780133969290
Author:
Hugh D. Young, Roger A. Freedman
Publisher:
PEARSON
Introduction To Quantum Mechanics
Introduction To Quantum Mechanics
Physics
ISBN:
9781107189638
Author:
Griffiths, David J., Schroeter, Darrell F.
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Physics for Scientists and Engineers
Physics for Scientists and Engineers
Physics
ISBN:
9781337553278
Author:
Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Lecture- Tutorials for Introductory Astronomy
Lecture- Tutorials for Introductory Astronomy
Physics
ISBN:
9780321820464
Author:
Edward E. Prather, Tim P. Slater, Jeff P. Adams, Gina Brissenden
Publisher:
Addison-Wesley
College Physics: A Strategic Approach (4th Editio…
College Physics: A Strategic Approach (4th Editio…
Physics
ISBN:
9780134609034
Author:
Randall D. Knight (Professor Emeritus), Brian Jones, Stuart Field
Publisher:
PEARSON
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS