(For this question you have 9 attempts - You may think of this as having 3 attempts for each subpart) Suppose aggregate demand is given by Q(p) = 37 5P and that consumers in this market are served by a monopoly producer with a cost function of a. Solve for the monopoly quantity. b. Solve for the monopoly price. c. Solve for the monopoly profit. C(q) = 126+2q + 1q2 дм =

(For this question you have 9 attempts - You may think of this as having 3 attempts for each subpart) Suppose aggregate demand is given by Q(p) = 37 5P and that consumers in this market are served by a monopoly producer with a cost function of a. Solve for the monopoly quantity. b. Solve for the monopoly price. c. Solve for the monopoly profit. C(q) = 126+2q + 1q2 дм =

Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)

14th Edition

ISBN:9781305506381

Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Publisher:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Chapter3: Demand Analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2.4CE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

What is the usual shape of a total revenue curve for a monopolist? Why?
Wonopoly and natural resource prices Suppose that a firm is the sole owner of a stock of a natural resource. a. How should the analysis of the maximization of the discounted profits from selling this resource (Equation 17.63 be modified to take this fact into account? b. Suppose that the demand for the resource in question had a constant elasticity form q(t)=a[p(t)]b . How would this change the price dynamics shown in Equation 17.67? c. How would the answer to Problem 17.7 be changed if the entire crude oil supply were owned by a single firm?
The Potomac Range Corporation manufactures a line of microwave ovens costing $500 each. Its sales have averaged about 6,000 units per month during the past year. In August, Potomacs closest competitor, Spring City Stove Works, cut its price for a closely competitive model from $600 to $450. Potomac noticed that its sales volume declined to 4,500 units per month after Spring City announced its price cut. What is the arc cross elasticity of demand between Potomacs oven and the competitive Spring City model? Would you say that these two firms are very dose competitors? What other factors could have influenced the observed relationship? If Potomac knows that the arc price elasticity of demand for its ovens is 3.0, what price would Potomac have to charge to sell the same number of units it did before the Spring City price cut?
The price elasticity of demand for air travel differs radically from first-class (1.3) to unrestricted coach (1.4) to restricted discount coach (1.9). What do these elasticities mean for optimal prices (fares) on a cross-country trip with incremental variable costs (marginal costs) equal to $120?
Inverse elasticity rule Use the first-order condition (Equation 15.2 ) for a Cournot firm to show that the usual inverse elasticity rule from Chapter 11 holds under Cournot competition (where the elasticity is associated with an individual firm's residual demand, the demand left after all rivals sell their output on the market). Manipulate Equation 15.2 in a different way to obtain an equivalent version of the inverse elasticity rule: pMCp=sieQ,p , where si=qi/Q is firm i's market share and eQp is the elasticity of market demand. Compare this version of the inverse elasticity rule with that for a monopolist from the previous chapter.
You are considering entry into a market in which there is currently only one producer (incumbent). If you enter, the incumbent can take one of two strategies, price low or price high. If he prices high, then you expect a $60K profit per year. If he prices low, then you expect $20K loss per year. You should enter if you believe demand is inelastic. you believe the probability that the incumbent will price low is greater than 0.75. you believe the probability that the incumbent will price low is less than 0.75. you believe the market size is growing.