The following results are from an independent-measures, two-factor study 5 participants in each treatment condition. Use a two-factor ANOVA with .05 to evaluate the main effects and the interaction. = Source Between Treatments SS 400 df LO 5 MS F

The following results are from an independent-measures, two-factor study 5 participants in each treatment condition. Use a two-factor ANOVA with .05 to evaluate the main effects and the interaction. = Source Between Treatments SS 400 df LO 5 MS F

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A study is designed to investigate whether there is a difference in response to various treatments in patients with Rheumatoid arthritis. The outcome is the patient’s self-reported effect of treatment. The data are shown below. Is there a significant difference in effect of treatment? Run the test at a 5% level of significance. Symptoms Worsened No Effect Symptoms Improved Total Treatment 1 22 14 14 50 Treatment 2 14 15 21 50 Treatment 3 9 12 29 50 Using the data above, suppose we focus on the proportions of patients who show improvement. Is there a statistically significant difference in the proportions of patients who show improvement between treatments 1 and 2? Run the test at a 5% level of significance.
The old variety of a plant has 70% pink flowers. A new variety is developed. In a random sample of 93 plants from the new variety, 59 had pink flowers. Test the claim that the percent of plants with pink flowers for the new variety is different than 70%. Use a 0.10 level of significance. Question 6 options: DO NOT Reject H0 Using a 0.10 level of significance there is not evidence to say the proportion of pink flowers is different than 0.70 Reject H0 Using a 0.10 level of significance there is evidence to say the proportion of pink flowers is not different than 0.70
In a certain study, the effect on oat yield was compared for the Pallinup, Overberg and Magnifico varieties of oats and four different concentrations of manure (0, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 tonnes per acre). Identify the experimental units, response variable, factor(s), levels of each factor and treatments.
The value of PRESS for five different regression models are A = 42.3, B = 47.4, C = 51.5, D =40.6, and E = 54.6. Based only on this statistic, which model is preferred?
The Cadet is a popular model of sport utility vehicle, known for its relatively high resale value. The bivariate data given below were taken from a sample of sixteen Cadets, each bought new two years ago, and each sold used within the past month. For each Cadet in the sample, we have listed both the mileage x (in thousands of miles) that the Cadet had on its odometer at the time it was sold used and the price y (in thousands of dollars) at which the Cadet was sold used. The least-squares regression line for these data has equation Ŷ=42.80-0.53x. This line is shown in the scatter plot below. (The 2nd picture contains the rest of the data as it would not fit in the first pic and it includes the question as well.)
See the attached two images for the description and than answer the following questions: Is there an overall positive association or an overall negative association between mean BRFSS score and rank based on the compensating-differentials method? Does the overall association indicate agreement or disagreement between the mean subjective BRFSS score and the ranking based on objective data used in the compensating-differentials method? Are there any outliers? If so, what are the BRFSS scores corresponding to these outliers?
Here are the scatter plots for two sets of bivariate data with the same response variable. The first compares the variables x & y. The second compares the variables w & y 098 Which explanatory variable has a stronger relationship with the response variable y? O The first variable (x) has a stronger relationship with the response variable y. O The second variable (w) has a stronger relationship with the response variable y.
A correlation study provides the following data: r = -.74 and the study involved 62 participants What is the effect size? NOTE: Please only report the number (and as always, do not Hl markvour ans wer as invalid)
2. Recovering from surgery: A new postsurgical treatment was compared with a stan- dard treatment. Seven subjects received the new treatment, while seven others (the controls) received the standard treatment. The recovery times, in days, are given below. Can you conclude that the mean recovery time for those receiving the new treatment is less than the mean for those receiving the standard treatment? Use the a = 0.05 level. Treatment: Control: H₁: 12 18 (a) List the null and alternate hypetheses. Ho : (c) List the P-value. 13 23 (d) Make the comparison. 15 24 19 30 20 32 (b) List the distribution, the test statistic, the calculator program, and all input and output variables. 21 35 We reject Ho / We do not reject Ho (circle one) (e) State the final conclusion in the wording of the problem. 24 39
A study was conducted of 90 adult male patients following a new treatment for congestive heart failure. One of the variables measured on the patients was the increase in exercise capacity (in minutes) over a 4-week treatment The previous treatment regime had produced an average increase of μ = 2 minutes. The researchers wanted to evaluate whether the new treatment had increased the value of μ in comparison to the previous treatment. The sample data yielded ?̅ = 2.17 and ? = 1.05: Using α = 05, what conclusions can you draw about the research hypothesis?