Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Engineering
Civil Engineering
For a flocculent suspension, determine the removal efficiency for a basin 3.0 m deep with an overflow rate v. of 0.05m/min using the laboratory settling data presented in the following table. Time, min 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0.6m 61 70 81 95 Suspended solids removed at indicated depth, % 1.2m 1.8m 2.4m 63 71 78 90 58 65 72 77 86 62 67 74 78 86 3.0m 60 63 70 74 77

For a flocculent suspension, determine the removal efficiency for a basin 3.0 m deep with an overflow rate v. of 0.05m/min using the laboratory settling data presented in the following table. Time, min 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0.6m 61 70 81 95 Suspended solids removed at indicated depth, % 1.2m 1.8m 2.4m 63 71 78 90 58 65 72 77 86 62 67 74 78 86 3.0m 60 63 70 74 77

Structural Analysis
Structural Analysis
6th Edition
ISBN:9781337630931
Author:KASSIMALI, Aslam.
Publisher:KASSIMALI, Aslam.
Chapter2: Loads On Structures
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question

For a flocculent suspension, determine the removal efficiency for a basin 3.0 m deep with an overflow rate of 0.05 m/min using the laboratory settling data presented in the following table. 

**Determining Removal Efficiency of Suspended Solids in a Flocculent Suspension** For a flocculent suspension, we aim to determine the removal efficiency for a basin that is 3.0 meters deep with an overflow rate (\(v_c\)) of 0.05 m/min. The laboratory settling data is provided in the following table: | **Time (min)** | **Suspended solids removed at indicated depth (%)** | |----------------|----------------------------------------------------| | | **0.6m** | **1.2m** | **1.8m** | **2.4m** | **3.0m** | | **20** | 61 | | 63 | 58 | | | **30** | 70 | | 71 | 65 | 62 | 60 | | **40** | 81 | | 71 | 72 | 67 | 63 | | **50** | 95 | | 78 | 72 | 74 | 70 | | **60** | | 90 | | 77 | | 74 | | **70** | | | 86 | | 78 | 74 | | **80** | | | | 86 | | 77 | ### Explanation of the Table The table displays the percentage of suspended solids removed at various depths (0.6m, 1.2m, 1.8m, 2.4m, 3.0m) over different time intervals (20 min to 80 min). For each depth, the percentage of removal is recorded at specific time points to understand how effective the sedimentation is over time. - **At 20 minutes**, the removal percentage at different depths starts from 61% at 0.6m, reaching 58% at 1.8m. - **At 50 minutes**, there is a significant increase in removal efficiency at shallow depths, with 95% removal at 0.6m. - **At 80 minutes**, the removal percentage is 86% at 2.4m and 77% at 3.0m, indicating more extended times improve removal efficiency, especially at greater depths
Transcribed Image Text:**Determining Removal Efficiency of Suspended Solids in a Flocculent Suspension** For a flocculent suspension, we aim to determine the removal efficiency for a basin that is 3.0 meters deep with an overflow rate (\(v_c\)) of 0.05 m/min. The laboratory settling data is provided in the following table: | **Time (min)** | **Suspended solids removed at indicated depth (%)** | |----------------|----------------------------------------------------| | | **0.6m** | **1.2m** | **1.8m** | **2.4m** | **3.0m** | | **20** | 61 | | 63 | 58 | | | **30** | 70 | | 71 | 65 | 62 | 60 | | **40** | 81 | | 71 | 72 | 67 | 63 | | **50** | 95 | | 78 | 72 | 74 | 70 | | **60** | | 90 | | 77 | | 74 | | **70** | | | 86 | | 78 | 74 | | **80** | | | | 86 | | 77 | ### Explanation of the Table The table displays the percentage of suspended solids removed at various depths (0.6m, 1.2m, 1.8m, 2.4m, 3.0m) over different time intervals (20 min to 80 min). For each depth, the percentage of removal is recorded at specific time points to understand how effective the sedimentation is over time. - **At 20 minutes**, the removal percentage at different depths starts from 61% at 0.6m, reaching 58% at 1.8m. - **At 50 minutes**, there is a significant increase in removal efficiency at shallow depths, with 95% removal at 0.6m. - **At 80 minutes**, the removal percentage is 86% at 2.4m and 77% at 3.0m, indicating more extended times improve removal efficiency, especially at greater depths
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 1 images

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Consolidation parameters
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, civil-engineering and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
Structural Analysis
Structural Analysis
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9781337630931
Author:
KASSIMALI, Aslam.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Structural Analysis (10th Edition)
Structural Analysis (10th Edition)
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9780134610672
Author:
Russell C. Hibbeler
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Cou…
Principles of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Cou…
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9781337705028
Author:
Braja M. Das, Nagaratnam Sivakugan
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Fundamentals of Structural Analysis
Fundamentals of Structural Analysis
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9780073398006
Author:
Kenneth M. Leet Emeritus, Chia-Ming Uang, Joel Lanning
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Sustainable Energy
Sustainable Energy
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9781337551663
Author:
DUNLAP, Richard A.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Traffic and Highway Engineering
Traffic and Highway Engineering
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9781305156241
Author:
Garber, Nicholas J.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS