Firms within the country of Anviliania are currently emitting pollutants. These pollutantscause damages within Anviliania. However, the pollutants also cause damages to theproperties and health of residents of countries that share borders with Anviliania.The Marginal Abatement Costs of the firms in Anviliania can be represented by theequationMAC(Anvil.) = 750 -2.3 eThe Marginal Damage Costs to the residents of Anviliania are given byMDC (Anvil.)=-- 40 + 10 eThe Marginal Damage Costs to all residents (including the residents of Anviliania) areMDC (Globe) = -20+ 12 ea. Draw a diagram representing this situation.b. Determine the magnitude of the local market failure and the global market failure.c. Suppose that the Anvilianian government has given production subsidies to the firms inAnviliania. As a result, the firms have increased production (and the number of firmshave increased.). Consequently, the aggregate MAC is nowMAC' (Anvil.) = 800 - 2.3 e.Determine the magnitude of the intervention failure.

To analyze the situation presented in the image, we should address the three tasks step by step:1.…

Answered: Firms within the country of Anviliania…

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Exton and Shill are 2 firms that can control emissions at the following marginal costs: MC1 = 400q1, MC2 = 200q2, where q1 and q2 are the amount of emissions reduced by Exton and Shill, respectively. Assume that with no control at all, each firm would be emitting 25 units of emissions. Estimate the cost-effective allocation of emissions control needed if a total reduction of 30 units of emissions is necessary.
Imagine a firm with a marginal abatement cost (MAC) function equal to: MAC = 120 10E. The government introduces a per-unit tax on emissions equal to $20. For a profit- maximizing firm, total compliance costs (total abatement costs plus tax payment) are $
Table 3 given in the following page describes the long run cost schedules for a typical firm in a given industry operating under perfect competition and without positive or negative external economies. Table 4 gives the demand schedule for the product of this industry. a) Fill out the missing entries in the table b) Plot the long run average total cost and marginal cost curves for the typical firm. Plot the supply curve for the typical firm on a second diagram. Plot the demand schedule for the whole industry on a third diagram. c) Currently the number of firms in the industry is 16. They all enjoy the same cost schedules given in Table 3. What is the equilibrium price? (Hint construct the market supply curve and plot it on the same diagram as the demand curve) d) What will happen to the number of firms in the long run? What are the basic economic forces and the characteristics of competitive markets that justify your answer? e) What is the long run equilibrium price and long run…
Exton and Shill are 2 firms that can control emissions at the following marginal costs: MC1 = 400q1, MC2 = 200q2, where q1 and q2 are the amount of emissions reduced by Exton and Shill, respectively. Assume that with no control at all, each firm would be emitting 25 units of emissions. Estimate the cost-effective allocation of emissions control needed if a total reduction of 30 units of emissions is necessary.
Suppose there are two industries with the estimated MAC functions as follows: MACA = 900-3Ea and MACB=600-2EB And suppose their estimated damages could be MD = 2E (the same for both industries). What would be the optimal emission standards for each industry and what would be the abatement costs for each polluter? Show your calculations.
Gerard.inc. is one of the leading producers of dairy exports. The company has 2 variants of superior milk, namely mocha and green tea. Based on historical data, the R&D team has found that the advantage per liter for each milk variant follows the following equation: πmocha = $45 - 0.9x and πgreen-tea = $65 - 1.7y Where x is the number of liters of mocha milk produced and y is the number of liters of green tea milk produced. It takes 2 hours to produce 1 liter of mocha milk and 5 hours to produce 1 liter of green tea milk. With the current number of workers, companies have a total of 40 hours of work in a day, and everything should be used to make both variants. The company wants to know the optimal amount of milk to be produced. a. How many liters of mocha milk and green tea should the company produce? b. What is the optimal objective function value based on your calculations? c. What is the lagrange multiplier value and what does it mean?
Please help me with this question ASAP
Imagine a firm with a marginal abatement cost (MAC) function equal to: MAC = 27-3E. The government introduces a per-unit tax on emissions equal to $6. For a profit-maximizing firm, total compliance costs (total abatement costs plus tax payment) are $ Answer:
Suppose a power generating plant emits particulates that damage crops and affect human health. The relationship between emissions and environmental damage is represented by the marginal damage function, MD=9e where e represents tons of emissions per month. The cost to the firm (and society) of eliminating emissions is represented the marginal abatement cost function, MAC=108.5 - 6.5e Both MD and MAC are dollar costs per month. If the power generating firm were allowed to ignore the social cost of its emissions, what would be the firm’s monthly emission level? Calculate the socially efficient level of pollution. If the emissions calculated in part B is a level found to shorten some people’s lives, could it still be considered socially efficient? Suppose the EPA set an emission standard at the socially efficient level calculated in part B. Calculate the cost to the firm of achieving this standard. Suppose that instead of a standard, the EPA charged an emissions tax. The tax is set at…
Need help on this to pass my class.
Consider a lake found in the town of Center Barnstead, and then answer the questions that follow. The town has a campground whose visitors use the lake for recreation. The town also has a fish cannery that dumps industrial waste into the lake. This pollutes the lake and makes it a less desirable vacation destination. That is, the fish cannery's waste decreases the campground's economic profit. Suppose that the fish cannery could use a different production method that involves recycling water. This would reduce the pollution in the lake to levels safe for recreation, and the campground would no longer be affected. If the fish cannery uses the recycling method, then the fish cannery's economic profit is $1,500 per week, and the campground's economic profit is $1,800 per week. If the fish cannery does not use the recycling method, then the fish cannery's economic profit is $2,000 per week, and the campground's economic profit is $1,000 per week. These figures are summarized…
Consider a market with two polluting firms with linear marginal abatement cost curves. Firm B has increasing marginal abatement costs that are everywhere half as high as Firm A’s marginal abatement costs. The maximum amount of pollution that can be tolerated is less than the total these two firms would emit if their pollution was unrestricted. Thus some aggregate amount of abatement is necessary. The pollutant in question is uniformly mixing, so it doesn’t matter which firm cuts back how much, only that between them, they cut back by the required total amount. The environmental agency decides to solve the abatement allocation problem by giving out pollution permits in amounts such that each firm would be obliged to cut back their emissions by an equal amount. Would this be “fair”? Would it be “efficient”?

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Economics

ISBN:

9780190931919

Author:

NEWNAN

Publisher:

Oxford University Press

Principles of Economics (12th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134078779

Author:

Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster

Publisher:

PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134870069

Author:

William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling

Publisher:

PEARSON

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Economics

ISBN:

9780190931919

Author:

NEWNAN

Publisher:

Oxford University Press

Principles of Economics (12th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134078779

Author:

Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster

Publisher:

PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134870069

Author:

William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling

Publisher:

PEARSON

Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)

Economics

ISBN:

9781305585126

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

Economics

ISBN:

9781337106665

Author:

Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…

Economics

ISBN:

9781259290619

Author:

Michael Baye, Jeff Prince

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS